In the fertilizer sector, CF, IPI, and NTR stand out as key players exposed to nitrogen, potash, and broader crop nutrient dynamics. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning amid volatile commodity prices driven by supply disruptions and agricultural demand. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term sector growth will find value in understanding their relative performance, valuations, and risk profiles in the current environment.
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is a leading producer of ammonia and nitrogen fertilizers, leveraging low-cost U.S. natural gas for competitive advantage. With a market capitalization of about $18.9 billion, it focuses on products like granular urea and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN). In recent market activity, the stock has surged YTD by roughly 59%, reflecting elevated nitrogen prices from geopolitical supply constraints. Sentiment shifted with pullbacks following trade route reopenings and cease-fires, causing 5-10% drops in late April, yet analysts maintain buy ratings with average price targets around $121. Strong return on equity (ROE) of 23% underscores operational efficiency.
IPI, or Intrepid Potash, Inc., specializes in potash, magnesium, and salt products for agriculture, feed, and industrial uses, operating through Potash, Trio, and Oilfield segments. Its smaller $534 million market cap reflects a niche focus. Recent performance shows YTD gains of 43%, buoyed by potash price rallies, though 1-year returns lag at 21%. A key development was the April 2026 sale of Intrepid South Ranch for $70 million, providing liquidity amid sector volatility. Elevated P/E of 47 signals growth expectations, but low ROE of 2% and no dividend highlight risks tied to potash market swings.
Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is the world's largest fertilizer producer by capacity, with leadership in potash and exposure to nitrogen, phosphate, and retail agronomics. Its $36 billion market cap enables diversification across crop inputs and services. YTD returns stand at 21%, with recent weeks showing minor pullbacks amid 1-month declines of under 1%. Analyst upgrades, including from BofA and Jefferies, cite bullish fertilizer outlooks, with targets averaging $80. A 2.9% dividend yield and improving earnings growth support stability, though ROE of 9% trails pure-play peers.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-powered trading bots from its library of 351 agents, curated for suitability in current market conditions like volatility in commodities and tech. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as AI/ML pattern recognition, swing trading, and fundamental analysis—across timeframes from minutes to months, targeting stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Standouts include bots with annualized returns ranging 50-160%, win rates of 50-88%, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 17, like those in semiconductors (+97% ann. return, 63% win rate) and industrials (+95% ann. return, 67% win rate). Traders can copy signals from Signal, Virtual, or Brokerage Agents without minimums. Explore these tools to align with dynamic sectors like fertilizers.
CF, IPI, and NTR operate in fertilizers but differ in focus: CF emphasizes nitrogen efficiency, IPI potash purity, and NTR diversified nutrients plus retail buffering. Growth drivers include global demand and supply tightness, with recent momentum favoring CF's 59% YTD surge versus NTR's 21%. Risks center on commodity cycles and geopolitics, amplified for smaller IPI (high P/E, low debt/equity). Valuation sensitivity shows CF's forward P/E of 10 cheapest, NTR PEG of 0.58 best for growth. Market sentiment leans positive on NTR scale and dividends, balancing CF agility.
Tickeron's AI models would likely favor CF in the current environment, given its superior trend consistency, attractive forward valuation, high ROE, and positioning as a low-cost nitrogen leader amid lingering supply catalysts. While NTR offers stability and IPI upside potential, CF's relative momentum suggests higher probability of outperformance short-term, subject to sector volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIPI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NTR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and NTR’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while IPI (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +16.38% , and NTR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price fluctuated -6.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.15%.
CF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
IPI is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
NTR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CF | IPI | NTR | |
| Capitalization | 20B | 627M | 34.6B |
| EBITDA | 3.7B | 55.4M | 6.32B |
| Gain YTD | 69.493 | 68.338 | 17.467 |
| P/E Ratio | 11.75 | 42.05 | 14.66 |
| Revenue | 7.41B | 302M | 27.8B |
| Total Cash | 2.04B | 99.3M | 777M |
| Total Debt | 3.62B | 3.68M | 13.9B |
CF | IPI | NTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 22 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 88 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 88 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 40 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 68 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 19 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTR's Valuation (34) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPI (75) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (89) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that NTR's stock grew somewhat faster than IPI’s and somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (73) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for IPI (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CF's stock grew somewhat faster than NTR’s and somewhat faster than IPI’s over the last 12 months.
CF's SMR Rating (27) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (71) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for IPI (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CF's stock grew somewhat faster than NTR’s and somewhat faster than IPI’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as IPI (40) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry, and is in the same range as NTR (49) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CF's stock grew similarly to IPI’s and similarly to NTR’s over the last 12 months.
CF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as IPI (68) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NTR (99) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CF's stock grew similarly to IPI’s and somewhat faster than NTR’s over the last 12 months.
| CF | IPI | NTR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 20 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AWP | 11.89 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | |||
| IBDW | 20.83 | -0.05 | -0.24% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF | |||
| JPMB | 39.92 | -0.13 | -0.32% |
| JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF | |||
| KNO | 59.80 | -0.39 | -0.65% |
| AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF | |||
| FFGX | 33.74 | -0.62 | -1.79% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTR has been closely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTR jumps, then CF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTR | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| CF - NTR | 66% Closely correlated | +4.75% | ||
| IPI - NTR | 54% Loosely correlated | +6.70% | ||
| MOS - NTR | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| CTVA - NTR | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| KPLUY - NTR | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.01% | ||
More | ||||