This comparison examines three leading nitrogen fertilizer producers: CF Industries Holdings, Inc., The Mosaic Company, and CVR Partners, LP. These stocks offer exposure to the agriculture sector, where global food demand and supply chain disruptions drive volatility. Recent geopolitical events in the Middle East have spiked nitrogen prices, benefiting producers but highlighting differences in business focus and performance. Traders seeking commodity-linked plays and long-term investors eyeing agribusiness growth will find insights into relative momentum, risks, and positioning in the current environment. Understanding these dynamics aids informed relative performance assessments.
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is the world's largest producer of ammonia and a major supplier of nitrogen fertilizers like urea, primarily serving North American and global markets. In recent market activity, the stock has rallied sharply, posting about 59% YTD gains and trading near $123 with a market cap of $18.8 billion. This momentum stems from elevated fertilizer prices amid supply concerns from Middle East tensions, positioning CF as a top S&P 500 performer earlier this year. Recent weeks saw some pullback after strong quarterly results, with analysts raising price targets to $135 amid sustained demand. Sentiment remains positive on its pure nitrogen focus and operational efficiency.
The MOSaic Company produces phosphate, potash, and nitrogen fertilizers, with a global footprint including key operations in Brazil. Recently, shares trade around $23 with a $7.4 billion market cap, reflecting modest 3% YTD returns amid sector tailwinds. Performance has softened in recent weeks, down over 12% in the past month due to rising input costs and anticipated Q1 earnings decline of 63%. Geopolitical price spikes provide uplift, but broader exposure to phosphates tempers gains compared to pure nitrogen peers. Analysts maintain neutral ratings with targets around $27.
CVR Partners, LP (UAN) is a master limited partnership (MLP, a structure offering high yields via distributions) focused on urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) solution production in the U.S. Corn Belt. Shares hover near $128 with a $1.35 billion market cap, up 25% YTD. Recent Q1 results highlighted robust demand, with UAN prices up 34% and ammonia utilization over 100%, driving EPS of $4.72. Fertilizer rallies from supply jitters have boosted sentiment, though its smaller scale adds volatility. Performance tracks spring planting strength closely.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, each trading thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like short-term scalping or momentum plays. Featured bots display impressive stats, including annualized returns from 50% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and drawdowns managed effectively. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents with 83-97% returns over days to weeks. These bots adapt to current volatility, providing real-time signals for stocks and ETFs. Investors can explore this section to identify bots suited to fertilizer sector swings or broader markets, enhancing trading efficiency.
CF, MOS, and UAN share nitrogen exposure fueling agriculture but differ in scope: CF's pure-play model excels in price spikes, while MOS's phosphate/potash diversification offers balance but dilutes nitrogen upside. UAN's UAN focus and MLP yields appeal for income, though smaller size heightens risks. Growth drivers include global planting demand and supply constraints; recent momentum favors CF over MOS's cost headwinds. Risks encompass commodity cycles and weather; valuations are comparable at 11-14 P/E, with UAN most yield-sensitive. Sentiment tilts toward nitrogen leaders amid tight markets.
Tickeron’s AI analysis leans toward CF in the current environment, given its superior trend consistency, 59% YTD gains, and leadership in the nitrogen rally driven by supply catalysts. MOS and UAN trail in relative positioning, with UAN offering yield potential but higher volatility. This probabilistic edge reflects observable momentum rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMOS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UAN’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UAN’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -3.74% , and UAN (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price fluctuated +1.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.
CF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MOS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
UAN is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CF | MOS | UAN | |
| Capitalization | 20B | 7.12B | 1.4B |
| EBITDA | 3.7B | 2.5B | 236M |
| Gain YTD | 69.493 | -6.273 | 34.259 |
| P/E Ratio | 11.75 | 159.93 | 11.55 |
| Revenue | 7.41B | 12.1B | 643M |
| Total Cash | 2.04B | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 3.62B | 4.8B | 575M |
CF | MOS | UAN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 51 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 94 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 65 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 2 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UAN's Valuation (2) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOS (43) and is significantly better than the same rating for CF (89). This means that UAN's stock grew somewhat faster than MOS’s and significantly faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (31) and is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (100). This means that UAN's stock grew similarly to CF’s and significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
UAN's SMR Rating (23) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (27) and is significantly better than the same rating for MOS (94). This means that UAN's stock grew similarly to CF’s and significantly faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as UAN (42) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MOS (65). This means that CF's stock grew similarly to UAN’s and somewhat faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.
MOS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (43) and is somewhat better than the same rating for UAN (48). This means that MOS's stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s and somewhat faster than UAN’s over the last 12 months.
| CF | MOS | UAN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 7 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AWP | 11.89 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | |||
| IBDW | 20.83 | -0.05 | -0.24% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corp ETF | |||
| JPMB | 39.92 | -0.13 | -0.32% |
| JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF | |||
| KNO | 59.80 | -0.39 | -0.65% |
| AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF | |||
| FFGX | 33.74 | -0.62 | -1.79% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAN has been loosely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UAN jumps, then CF could also see price increases.