CL
Price
$84.34
Change
-$1.70 (-1.98%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
67.67B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DEO
Price
$77.45
Change
-$1.08 (-1.38%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
43.09B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$166.15
Change
+$3.08 (+1.89%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
28.81B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL or DEO or STZ

Header iconCL vs DEO vs STZ Comparison
Open Charts CL vs DEO vs STZBanner chart's image
CL vs DEO vs STZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Diageo (DEO) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CL exhibits resilient year-to-date gains of about 8%, with low volatility (beta 0.26), though recent pullbacks tied to oil price pressures have impacted margins.
  • DEO trades at attractive valuations (trailing P/E 17.07, forward P/E 8.19) and highest dividend yield (4.49%), but faces softening spirits demand and significant 52-week declines.
  • STZ shows moderate YTD performance around 9%, supported by strong beer brands like Modelo, amid CEO transition and upcoming earnings.
  • Consumer staples exposure provides defensive qualities across all three, with CL leading in stability, while DEO and STZ contend with beverage sector headwinds.
  • Relative performance highlights CL's trend consistency versus broader pullbacks in alcoholic beverages stocks.

Introduction

This comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), DEO (Diageo), and STZ (Constellation Brands), three consumer defensive stocks spanning personal care and alcoholic beverages. These companies offer stability amid market volatility, appealing to dividend-focused investors and traders seeking relative performance insights. In recent market activity, staples have shown resilience, but sector-specific pressures like input costs and demand shifts influence their trajectories. This analysis highlights stock comparison metrics, recent momentum, and positioning for informed decision-making in the current environment.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global leader in oral, personal, home care, and pet nutrition products, maintains a strong international footprint with about 70% of sales overseas. Trading around $85 with a market cap of $68B, the stock has delivered solid YTD gains of 8.38%, outperforming in recent weeks despite a monthly pullback of over 10%. This dip reflects broader consumer equity concerns from rising oil prices squeezing margins. Key metrics include a trailing P/E of 32.37, forward P/E of 21.83, beta of 0.26, and dividend yield of 2.49%. Sentiment remains supported by sales momentum and innovation in premium segments, positioning CL as a defensive play with consistent compounded growth.

DEO Overview and Recent Performance

Diageo (DEO), a premier alcoholic beverages producer with brands like Johnnie Walker, Guinness, and Smirnoff, operates across spirits, beer, and ready-to-drink categories worldwide. Shares hover near $74, with a $41B market cap, reflecting sharp 52-week declines from $117 highs amid softening demand. YTD returns stand at 14.70%, but recent news highlights cyclical and structural headwinds, including consumer trade-downs and inventory normalization. Valuation appears compelling at trailing P/E 17.07, forward P/E 8.19, beta 0.17, and leading dividend yield of 4.49%. Strategic launches like Johnnie Walker Red Soul and partnerships aim to counter challenges, though spirits sector pressures weigh on sentiment.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands (STZ) focuses on high-end beer (Corona, Modelo), wine, and spirits, with U.S. operations bolstered by Mexican production. At about $150 and $26B market cap, the stock has YTD gains near 9%, down from 52-week peaks above $196. Recent market activity shows a five-year share price slide, tied to softer beer volumes and demand shifts. Notable developments include a CEO succession to Nicholas Fink and Q4/fiscal 2026 earnings due April 8. Metrics feature trailing P/E 23.49, forward P/E 11.81, beta 0.42, and 2.73% yield. Core brands drive 84% of revenue, with analysts eyeing volume recovery despite margin resets.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like technical patterns, fundamentals, and risk management. AI dynamically selects 25 trending bots suited to current volatility, showcasing annualized returns from 15% to 188%, win rates of 55-89%, and profit factors up to 12. Examples include a minerals-to-aerospace bot at +127% annualized (61% win rate) and semiconductor-focused agents exceeding 90% returns with 67-70% wins. These bots excel in growth sectors but adapt across assets, offering copy trading via signal, virtual, or brokerage agents with no minimums. Traders can explore real-time signals to enhance strategies—visit Trending AI Robots for the latest edge in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CL, DEO, and STZ share consumer defensive traits but diverge in business models: CL emphasizes essential hygiene products with global scale, while DEO and STZ navigate discretionary alcoholic beverages facing demand softness and premiumization trade-offs. Growth drivers contrast CL's steady volume via innovation against beverage peers' reliance on brand strength amid economic sensitivity. Recent momentum favors CL's stability (lowest beta 0.26), versus DEO's sharp declines and STZ's transition. Risk factors include commodity costs for CL, regulatory/tariff exposure for beverages. Valuations show DEO cheapest (forward P/E 8.19), STZ balanced (11.81), CL premium (21.83). Market sentiment tilts toward CL's defensiveness in uncertain conditions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor CL in the current environment, given its superior trend consistency, lowest volatility, and resilient YTD performance amid broader consumer pressures. While DEO offers value and yield, demand headwinds elevate risks; STZ holds catalysts via earnings but trails in stability. Observable factors like beta and relative positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance for CL near-term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $84.34DEO: $77.45STZ: $166.15)
Brand notoriety: CL and STZ are notable and DEO is not notable
CL represents the Household/Personal Care industry, DEO is part of the Beverages: Alcoholic industry, and STZ is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 67%, DEO: 91%, STZ: 203%
Market capitalization -- CL: $67.67B, DEO: $43.09B, STZ: $28.81B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $67.67B. DEO’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $43.09B. STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $28.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $337.35B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $146.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $19.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $5.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $25.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDEO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DEO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CL is a better buy in the long-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than DEO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DEO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DEO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CL is a better buy in the short-term than DEO and STZ.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while DEO (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +5.63% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated +9.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

DEO is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Beverages: Alcoholic (-0.78% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.29% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CL($67.7B) has a higher market cap than DEO($43.1B) and STZ($28.8B). CL has higher P/E ratio than DEO and STZ: CL (32.07) vs DEO (17.90) and STZ (17.29). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 21.217 vs. CL (7.386) and DEO (-10.224). DEO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.39B vs. CL (3.96B) and STZ (2.47B). DEO has more cash in the bank: 2.69B vs. CL (1.29B) and STZ (152M). CL has less debt than STZ and DEO: CL (8.55B) vs STZ (10.7B) and DEO (23.5B). CL and DEO has higher revenues than STZ: CL (20.4B) and DEO (19.8B) vs STZ (9.38B).
CLDEOSTZ
Capitalization67.7B43.1B28.8B
EBITDA3.96B6.39B2.47B
Gain YTD7.386-10.22421.217
P/E Ratio32.0717.9017.29
Revenue20.4B19.8B9.38B
Total Cash1.29B2.69B152M
Total Debt8.55B23.5B10.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs DEO vs STZ: Fundamental Ratings
CL
DEO
STZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100100
SMR RATING
1..100
59755
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
567748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
395477
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DEO's Valuation (13) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (49) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that DEO's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DEO (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than DEO’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for DEO (97) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than DEO’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as DEO (77) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to DEO’s over the last 12 months.

CL's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as DEO (54) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (77) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to DEO’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLDEOSTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DEO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWN73.921.86
+2.58%
Taiwan Fund
SPTE37.170.37
+1.01%
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
MSFD14.750.10
+0.66%
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
MSDD62.510.23
+0.37%
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
BKLN20.49-0.07
-0.34%
Invesco Senior Loan ETF

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
-1.98%
PG - CL
72%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
CHD - CL
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
UL - CL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
CLX - CL
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
KMB - CL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

DEO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEO has been closely correlated with PRNDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DEO jumps, then PRNDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DEO
1D Price
Change %
DEO100%
-1.38%
PRNDY - DEO
69%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
MGPI - DEO
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
BUD - DEO
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
STZ - DEO
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
REMYY - DEO
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
+1.89%
SAM - STZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
TAP - STZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
BUD - STZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More