Advertisement
CL or EL or STZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. The Estée Lauder Companies (EL) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CL exhibits relative stability in the consumer staples sector, with recent launches like Optic White Pro Series supporting premium positioning amid a monthly price decline of around 6%.
- EL faces headwinds from tariff risks and declining organic sales, posting a year-to-date drop of approximately 15% despite fragrance growth.
- STZ shows year-to-date gains near 10%, bolstered by premium beer brands, though softer demand pressures recent performance.
- All three operate in consumer defensive spaces, but CL trades at a premium valuation with stronger YTD momentum compared to peers.
- Market sentiment favors essential goods resilience in CL over discretionary luxury in EL and cyclical beverages in STZ.
- Recent volatility highlights trade-offs in growth potential versus defensive qualities across these stocks.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), EL (The Estée Lauder Companies), and STZ (Constellation Brands), all rooted in consumer defensive sectors. These companies span oral care essentials, prestige beauty, and premium beverages, offering insights into relative performance amid shifting consumer spending and macroeconomic pressures. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on long-term stability in household staples will find value in analyzing their recent price behavior, sector exposure, and valuation sensitivities. This analysis draws on current market data to highlight contrasts in growth drivers and risk profiles.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global leader in oral, personal, and home care products, maintains a robust portfolio including toothpaste, soaps, and pet nutrition. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $90, reflecting a monthly decline of about 6% but year-to-date gains exceeding 13%. Sentiment has been influenced by product innovations like the Optic White Pro Series toothpaste, emphasizing premium oral care, alongside a quarterly dividend increase to $0.53 per share. Trading below some analyst targets, CL benefits from steady demand for essentials, though faces pressures from rising costs and geopolitical tensions impacting consumer spending. Its market cap stands near $72 billion, underscoring defensive appeal in volatile conditions.
EL Overview and Recent Performance
The Estée Lauder Companies (EL) specializes in prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance, and hair care, with iconic brands like Estée Lauder, Clinique, and Tom Ford. Recent weeks have seen the stock hover near $89, down roughly 15% year-to-date and 20% over the past month, amid challenges like a projected $100 million tariff hit and 1.5% organic sales decline. Positive notes include 6% fragrance growth and the acquisition of Forest Essentials to bolster India presence. Profit margin pressures and travel retail risks have tempered sentiment, with a market cap around $32 billion reflecting luxury sector vulnerabilities to economic slowdowns and shifting consumer priorities.
STZ Overview and Recent Performance
Constellation Brands (STZ) focuses on beer, wine, and spirits, anchored by high-end imports like Corona and Modelo. The stock trades near $152, with year-to-date returns around 10% but a modest monthly dip of 3%. Leadership transition to new CEO Nicholas Fink and softer demand in beverages have influenced recent activity, offset by premiumization strategies and cost-saving initiatives. A market cap of approximately $26 billion positions STZ as a growth-oriented player in consumer staples, though cyclical elements expose it to changing preferences and macroeconomic headwinds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, handpicked by AI analysis for their suitability to prevailing market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from technical and fundamental analysis to signal generation with risk management—across timeframes like 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute intervals, tailored for low, medium, or high volatility environments. Notable performers have delivered annualized returns up to 279% with win rates exceeding 90% in recent periods, highlighting their edge in sector rotations and trend capture. Traders can explore copy trading options via signal agents, virtual agents, or brokerage-integrated bots. Visit Trending AI Robots to identify tools aligned with current opportunities.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CL, EL, and STZ share consumer defensive traits but diverge in business models: CL's daily essentials drive recession resistance, EL's luxury beauty ties to discretionary spending, and STZ's premium alcohol blends stability with volume sensitivity. Growth drivers contrast sharply—STZ leverages beer premiumization (YTD +10%), while EL grapples with sales declines (-15% YTD). Recent momentum favors CL and STZ over EL. Risk factors include tariffs for EL, demand shifts for STZ, and input costs for CL. Valuation sensitivity shows CL at a higher P/E amid stability, with STZ appearing undervalued relative to peers. Market sentiment leans toward essentials over luxury in uncertain times.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis currently leans toward CL for its trend consistency in essential goods, lower volatility, and positive YTD positioning amid broader consumer staples resilience. Factors like innovation-driven sentiment and dividend growth enhance its relative stability compared to EL's tariff-exposed declines and STZ's demand uncertainties. This probabilistic edge favors CL in the near term, though shifting catalysts could alter dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- EL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- STZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while EL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +6.03% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated +7.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
EL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.37% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| CL | EL | STZ | |
| Capitalization | 69B | 26.5B | 28.3B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 1.39B | 2.47B |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | -29.794 | 18.970 |
| P/E Ratio | 32.71 | 147.80 | 16.97 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 14.7B | 9.38B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 3.08B | 152M |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 9.39B | 10.7B |
CL | EL | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 59 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 90 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 64 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 34 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STZ's Valuation (48) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EL (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to EL’s and somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EL (90) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as EL (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to EL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as EL (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (98) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to EL’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | EL | STZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 63% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 8 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 38% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CRPT | 12.52 | 0.08 | +0.64% |
| First Trust SkyBdg Cry Idt & Dgt Eco ETF | |||
| SUSA | 137.61 | 0.21 | +0.15% |
| iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF | |||
| MDEV | 19.03 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Indxx Global Mdcl Dvcs ETF | |||
| ENFR | 37.65 | -0.22 | -0.58% |
| Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| HOOX | 19.68 | -1.19 | -5.70% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
EL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EL has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EL jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.
STZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.