Advertisement
CL or KDP or MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CL demonstrated resilience with Q4 earnings beats driven by emerging market growth and AI productivity gains, supporting year-to-date gains around 18% amid stable consumer staples demand.
- KDP reported strong Q4 revenue growth exceeding 10% year-over-year, bolstered by U.S. refreshment beverages and acquisitions, though shares faced recent pressure with YTD returns near 1%.
- MNST achieved Q4 sales growth of 17.6% on energy drink demand but saw shares decline over 9% post-earnings due to cost pressures, with recent monthly drops around 8%.
- Across recent market activity, CL leads in relative stability and YTD performance, while MNST offers higher growth potential tempered by volatility risks.
- Analyst targets suggest upside for KDP around 26%, positioning it as a value play in beverages amid sector rotations.
- Consumer defensive positioning favors CL in uncertain environments, contrasting MNST's cyclical exposure.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CL, KDP, and MNST, three leaders in consumer staples and beverages, highlighting their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. Investors seeking defensive plays may favor CL's essential products, while growth-oriented traders eye MNST's energy segment momentum. KDP bridges value and expansion via diversified beverages. Amid recent earnings cycles and shifting sentiment, this analysis aids decisions on stock comparison, relative performance, and portfolio allocation in the current market environment.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global leader in oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition, maintains dominance with over 40% toothpaste market share worldwide. In recent quarters, the company reported Q4 results exceeding earnings and revenue expectations, fueled by 4.5% organic growth in emerging markets and AI-driven productivity initiatives. Gross margins reached 60.3%, underscoring operational efficiency despite cost pressures. Shares have advanced approximately 18% year-to-date, outperforming broader indices, though recent weeks saw modest pullbacks amid mixed insider activity. Sentiment remains positive on resilient demand for essentials, positioning CL as a core holding in consumer staples portfolios.
KDP Overview and Recent Performance
Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) operates as a leading North American beverage firm with a portfolio exceeding 125 brands across soft drinks, coffee, teas, and more, generating over $15 billion in annual revenue. Recent Q4 performance featured 10.5% year-over-year revenue growth, surpassing estimates, supported by U.S. refreshment beverages and the JDE Peet's acquisition. Guidance for 2026 sales of $25.9-26.4 billion signals confidence. Shares have traded flat to slightly positive year-to-date around 1%, with recent dips reflecting broader market rotations, yet analysts project 26% upside to $35.36. Steady dividend growth and undervaluation metrics bolster appeal amid economic uncertainty.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage (MNST), a key player in energy drinks holding nearly 40% global market share behind its flagship Monster Energy line, also offers strategic brands, alcohol beverages, and others. Q4 net sales rose 17.6% to $2.13 billion, beating estimates on strong international demand and sugar-free variants, with gross margins expanding slightly to 55.5%. However, shares fell over 9% post-earnings due to elevated costs like aluminum and operating expenses up 21.4%, contributing to recent monthly declines near 8% and YTD softness. Leadership changes aim to enhance regional growth, sustaining long-term momentum despite near-term volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ AI/ML for trend following, dip buying, hedging, and signals, with standout performers delivering annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors reaching 25+. Examples include bots targeting consumer staples like PG and WMT with 60-80% win rates, alongside high-volatility plays in semiconductors and aerospace. Optimized for current volatility, low drawdowns, and sector rotations, they offer virtual, paper, or live copy trading. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to your risk profile and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CL, KDP, and MNST operate in consumer defensive spaces but diverge in business models: CL's essentials like toothpaste ensure recession resistance, contrasting MNST's discretionary energy drinks sensitive to premiumization trends. KDP balances via diversified beverages including staples and coffee. Growth drivers favor MNST's 17%+ sales momentum over CL's steady 5% organic rises, while KDP leverages acquisitions. Recent momentum shows CL ahead YTD at 18%, KDP stable, and MNST volatile with post-earnings dips. Risks include MNST's commodity costs versus CL's debt concerns; all share sector exposure to inflation. Valuation sensitivity tilts KDP as undervalued with 26% upside, while sentiment favors CL's stability over MNST's growth trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CL for its trend consistency, earnings beats, emerging market catalysts, and superior relative YTD positioning amid defensive sector rotations. Probabilistic edges stem from 60%+ margins and lower volatility versus MNST's cost headwinds, though KDP trails closely on value metrics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MNST’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MNST’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KDP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +4.98% , and MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +4.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164975.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.66% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CL | KDP | MNST | |
| Capitalization | 67.7B | 36.1B | 74B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 4.19B | 2.53B |
| Gain YTD | 7.386 | -3.511 | -1.239 |
| P/E Ratio | 32.07 | 17.37 | 39.03 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 16.6B | 8.29B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | N/A | 2.77B |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 17.6B | 199M |
CL | KDP | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 65 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 74 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 61 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 94 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KDP's stock grew significantly faster than MNST’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MNST (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MNST (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | KDP | MNST | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 10 days ago 45% | 13 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JUNZ | 32.42 | N/A | N/A |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF | |||
| AUSM | 25.11 | -0.03 | -0.11% |
| Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | |||
| VFL | 10.17 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| abrdn National Municipal Income Fund | |||
| TLH | 100.58 | -0.28 | -0.28% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| HNDL | 22.30 | -0.07 | -0.32% |
| Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl™ ETF | |||
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||