Advertisement
CL or KDP or PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CL has shown resilience in recent market activity with year-to-date gains around 8%, outperforming peers amid consumer staples stability, though down over the past year.
- KDP trades at a relatively lower valuation with forward P/E around 13-18x, but faces pressure from recent declines of about 5% YTD and 20% over 12 months.
- PEP benefits from diversified snacks and beverages, posting modest YTD gains near 6% and stronger 1-year returns, supported by steady international demand.
- All three stocks operate in defensive consumer staples, with recent pullbacks creating valuation opportunities; CL and PEP exhibit lower volatility (beta ~0.26-0.37).
- Recent sentiment reflects broader sector caution due to inflation and commodity costs, yet earnings beats in Q4 2025 bolster confidence in organic growth.
- Tickeron's AI bots trading consumer staples including CL and KDP show annualized returns up to 69%, highlighting algorithmic edge in this space.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper), and PEP (PepsiCo), three stalwarts in the consumer staples sector. These companies produce essential household goods—from oral care and pet nutrition to beverages and snacks—making them attractive for defensive portfolios amid economic uncertainty. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors eyeing dividend stability will find value here, as recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum, valuation, and growth drivers in a high-inflation environment.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global leader in oral, personal, home care, and pet nutrition products, maintains a strong market position through brands like Colgate toothpaste and Hill's pet food. In recent weeks, CL shares have traded around $85, reflecting a pullback from 52-week highs near $99 amid broader sector pressures from rising input costs. Year-to-date performance stands positive at approximately 8%, supported by Q4 2025 earnings that beat expectations with EPS of $0.95 versus $0.91 forecasted. Sentiment has been influenced by resilient demand for everyday essentials and strategic healthcare marketing pushes, though inflation and oil price volatility have tempered gains, leading to a 5% 1-year decline.
KDP Overview and Recent Performance
Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) specializes in beverages, including Dr Pepper sodas, Snapple, and Keurig coffee systems, operating across U.S. refreshment, coffee, and international segments. Shares hover near $26.50, down from 52-week highs of $36, with recent market activity showing a 5% YTD dip and sharper 20-21% 1-year losses. Performance reflects challenges like coffee headwinds and labor issues, yet Q3 2025 sales grew 10.7% to $4.31 billion, driven by acquisitions like GHOST energy drinks. Investor sentiment remains cautious due to elevated debt and volume pressures, though raised full-year guidance signals underlying strength in refreshment beverages.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo (PEP), a diversified giant in beverages (Pepsi, Gatorade) and snacks (Lay's, Doritos), leverages global scale across North America, Europe, and emerging markets. Trading around $150-151, shares have gained about 6% YTD but lagged with 3-7% 1-year returns amid snack segment softness. Recent weeks saw modest declines from highs near $171, influenced by North American cost-cutting announcements and international growth. Q3 2025 revenue beat estimates at $23.94 billion, fueled by healthier drinks and pricing power, bolstering sentiment despite execution risks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only the most suitable for current volatility—based on metrics like win rates (55-89%), profit factors (1.4-12+), and annualized returns (15-138%)—earn a spot among the featured 25. For instance, bots targeting consumer staples including CL, KDP, and peers like DEO have posted +69% annualized returns with 59-74% win rates on 60-minute frames. Multi-agent systems hedge volatility using 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss in sectors like semiconductors or ETFs. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CL, KDP, and PEP share consumer staples defensiveness but diverge in models: CL focuses on hygiene/pet (stable recurring demand), KDP on beverages/coffee (growth via acquisitions but debt-sensitive), and PEP on snacks/beverages (diversified revenue). Recent momentum favors CL (8% YTD) over PEP (6%) and KDP (-5%), reflecting CL's lower beta. KDP offers cheapest entry (forward P/E 13-18x) versus PEP (19-25x) and CL (32x), trading growth for value. Risks include commodity inflation for all, with KDP exposed to coffee cycles and PEP to snacking volumes. Sentiment tilts positive on earnings resilience, positioning CL/PEP for stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CL due to superior recent trend consistency, lower volatility, and YTD outperformance in a staples rotation. Its defensive hygiene exposure and earnings reliability provide probabilistic edge over KDP's valuation discount amid headwinds, or PEP's diversification tempered by snack pressures. Bots trading these names underscore CL's relative strength.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KDP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.77% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83822.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.29% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CL | KDP | PEP | |
| Capitalization | 67B | 36B | 215B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 4.19B | 15.5B |
| Gain YTD | 7.016 | -3.765 | 10.362 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.76 | 17.32 | 24.65 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 16.6B | 93.9B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 9.53B |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 17.6B | 49.9B |
CL | KDP | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 75 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 61 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 95 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (75) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (95) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | KDP | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 49% | 12 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 43% | 6 days ago 46% | 6 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | N/A | 4 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GGRW | 35.89 | 0.27 | +0.76% |
| Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF | |||
| FNDA | 35.65 | 0.23 | +0.65% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF | |||
| AUSM | 25.12 | N/A | +0.01% |
| Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | |||
| JHI | 13.48 | -0.03 | -0.22% |
| John Hancock Investors Trust Capital Stock | |||
| HQL | 17.97 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
| abrdn Life Sciences Investors | |||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| KO - PEP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||