CL
Price
$85.81
Change
+$2.19 (+2.62%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
68.85B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KDP
Price
$26.53
Change
+$0.49 (+1.88%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
36.05B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$162.28
Change
-$1.97 (-1.20%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
28.14B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL or KDP or STZ

Header iconCL vs KDP vs STZ Comparison
Open Charts CL vs KDP vs STZBanner chart's image
CL vs KDP vs STZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CL has shown year-to-date gains around 7-8%, with recent weeks featuring pullbacks amid broader market volatility, reflecting its defensive consumer staples positioning.
  • KDP trades at a forward P/E below sector averages, offering relative value, though recent performance has lagged with declines over the past month.
  • STZ exhibits higher volatility tied to beer and spirits demand, with YTD gains near 10% but longer-term underperformance due to sector headwinds.
  • Across recent market activity, CL demonstrates superior stability compared to KDP and STZ, which face pricing and volume pressures.
  • Valuation metrics highlight KDP's discount, while STZ benefits from premium brand exposure in beverages.
  • AI-driven strategies on platforms like Tickeron favor consumer staples bots trading these tickers for trend consistency.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper), and STZ (Constellation Brands), all operating in consumer defensive sectors with exposure to essential goods like oral care, non-alcoholic beverages, and premium beer/wine. These companies appeal to investors seeking stability amid market fluctuations, as well as traders eyeing relative performance in consumer staples and beverages. Recent price behavior, influenced by volume trends, pricing dynamics, and sector sentiment, provides insights into their market positioning for portfolio diversification or tactical trades.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) is a global leader in oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition, marketing brands like Colgate toothpaste, Palmolive soaps, and Hill's pet food across over 200 countries. In recent market activity, CL shares have experienced downward pressure, declining around 10% over the past month from highs near $99 to approximately $85, amid broader consumer staples rotation. Year-to-date, the stock has gained about 7.6%, outperforming in defensive contexts, supported by steady demand for essentials despite modest volume growth and pricing trade-offs in emerging markets. Sentiment remains buoyed by operational efficiency and a forward P/E near 25x, though recent pullbacks reflect sensitivity to economic uncertainty.

KDP Overview and Recent Performance

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) manufactures and distributes non-alcoholic beverages, including Dr Pepper, Snapple, and Keurig single-serve coffee systems, with a portfolio exceeding 125 brands. Recent weeks have seen KDP shares slide roughly 10% from $30 to around $26, underperforming peers amid cost pressures and soft U.S. volumes. YTD returns hover near 5%, with international growth in markets like Mexico providing offset via 15% constant-currency sales increases in recent quarters. Trading at a forward P/E of about 12x—below industry norms—the stock reflects value amid Q4 sales beats, though labor and commodity headwinds temper sentiment.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands (STZ) produces and markets beer, wine, and spirits, featuring Corona, Modelo, and Robert Mondavi brands, with strong U.S. import focus. In recent trading, STZ has fluctuated around $150-155, down about 5% monthly but up YTD by approximately 10%, driven by premium beer resilience despite wine softness. Broader pressures from demand shifts among key demographics and upcoming earnings have influenced volatility, with a P/E near 24x signaling growth expectations tied to high-end positioning. Market sentiment balances beer strength against spirits and wine challenges.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots designed for thousands of tickers, spotlighting those excelling in volatile conditions across sectors like consumer staples, energy, and semiconductors. These bots showcase annualized returns from +15% to +138%, win rates of 56-89%, and diverse strategies including swing trading, trend following, and hedging on timeframes like 5-60 minutes. A consumer staples bot, for instance, trades eight tickers including CL and KDP with +69% annualized return and 59% win rate. Explore these curated tools to align AI-driven insights with current market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CL, KDP, and STZ span consumer defensive realms, with CL anchored in recession-resistant oral/home care, KDP in non-alcoholic refreshment, and STZ in premium alcohol. Growth drivers differ: CL leverages emerging market pricing, KDP international volume, and STZ beer imports. Recent momentum favors CL's stability over KDP's declines and STZ's volatility. Risks include commodity costs for all, with STZ exposed to consumption trends. KDP offers cheapest valuation at 12x forward P/E versus 25x for CL and 24x for STZ; sentiment tilts defensive amid uncertainty.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI analysis leans toward CL in the current environment, citing its trend consistency, lower beta around 0.3, and inclusion in high-performing staples bots amid volatility. KDP trails on momentum despite value, while STZ shows catalyst potential from beer but higher risk. Probability favors CL for relative outperformance based on stability and sector rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $85.81KDP: $26.53STZ: $162.28)
Brand notoriety: CL and STZ are notable and KDP is not notable
CL represents the Household/Personal Care industry, KDP is part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, and STZ is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 118%, KDP: 106%, STZ: 126%
Market capitalization -- CL: $68.85B, KDP: $36.05B, STZ: $28.14B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $68.85B. KDP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $36.05B. STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $28.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $341.47B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $326B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $147.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $19.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $25.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CL is a better buy in the long-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than KDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KDP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CL and STZ are a better buy in the short-term than KDP.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -0.15% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated -2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2073.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.77% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.04% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CL($68.8B) has a higher market cap than KDP($36B) and STZ($28.1B). CL has higher P/E ratio than KDP and STZ: CL (32.63) vs KDP (17.34) and STZ (16.89). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 18.394 vs. CL (9.258) and KDP (-3.656). KDP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. CL (3.96B) and STZ (2.47B). CL has less debt than STZ and KDP: CL (8.55B) vs STZ (10.7B) and KDP (17.6B). CL has higher revenues than KDP and STZ: CL (20.4B) vs KDP (16.6B) and STZ (9.38B).
CLKDPSTZ
Capitalization68.8B36B28.1B
EBITDA3.96B4.19B2.47B
Gain YTD9.258-3.65618.394
P/E Ratio32.6317.3416.89
Revenue20.4B16.6B9.38B
Total Cash1.29BN/A152M
Total Debt8.55B17.6B10.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs KDP vs STZ: Fundamental Ratings
CL
KDP
STZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
711170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100100
SMR RATING
1..100
57555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
576151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
439579
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (47) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (75) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.

CL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (79) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (95) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CL's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKDPSTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSSS32.620.58
+1.82%
Monarch Select Subsector ETF
CGUS42.100.43
+1.03%
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
RPAR23.010.19
+0.83%
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
EMES25.89N/A
N/A
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
XHYE39.24N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
+2.62%
PG - CL
70%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
CHD - CL
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
CLX - CL
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
UL - CL
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
KMB - CL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More