This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company), KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation), and MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.), all key players in consumer staples. These companies produce essential goods—oral care, personal hygiene, and snacks—offering resilience in volatile markets. Investors seeking defensive positions with dividends and growth potential, or traders eyeing relative performance in recent market activity, will find value in understanding their business models, momentum, and sector dynamics. Amid inflation concerns and shifting consumer spending, this analysis highlights contrasts in recent trends and positioning.
Colgate-Palmolive Company is a global leader in oral, personal, and home care products, with brands like Colgate toothpaste dominant in over 200 countries. In recent market activity, CL shares have displayed resilience, posting YTD gains near 13% and trading around $90. Q4 2025 earnings beat estimates with $0.95 EPS and $5.23 billion revenue, up 5.8% year-over-year, driven by steady demand for essentials in Latin America and Europe. A quarterly dividend hike to $0.53 per share bolstered sentiment, despite broader concerns over inflation and oil prices impacting consumer spending. Trading above key moving averages, CL reflects positive momentum from earnings strength and strategic investments, though monthly fluctuations highlight sector volatility.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation manufactures personal care items like Huggies diapers, Kleenex tissues, and Depend incontinence products, serving over 175 countries. KMB shares, around $99, have faced pressure with YTD declines near -1% and a 26% drop over the past year, trading at a P/E of about 20x. Recent weeks saw mixed results amid slowing revenue growth and margin challenges from competition and demand shifts. A 5.15% dividend yield attracts income seekers, supported by leadership changes and innovation focus. Analysts view it as undervalued by up to 44%, with fair value estimates around $119, though broader economic headwinds like inflation weigh on performance.
Mondelez International, Inc. is a snack giant with brands like Oreo and Cadbury, operating in 160 countries. MDLZ shares near $55 have declined in recent months, with 1-month drops around 9-12% and YTD mixed at about 2-6%, reflecting cocoa price volatility and weak demand. A 3.64% dividend yield persists, but Q4 forecasts indicate flat-to-2% organic growth due to price hikes deterring shoppers. Investments like CHF 65 million in Toblerone production aim at premium segments, yet P/E near 30x signals caution amid consumer shifts. Undervaluation estimates of 18% offer appeal, balanced by input cost pressures.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers. These bots are selected by AI for superior adaptation to current market conditions, featuring diverse strategies across sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, and consumer staples. Standouts include a multi-sector bot with +130% annualized return, 62% win rate, and 2.68 profit factor over 25 tickers; a leveraged ETF bot at +110% annualized, 70% win rate; and a consumer staples bot yielding +23% annualized on COST, NFLX, HD, PG with 72% win rate and 7.35 profit factor. Performance ranges span +17% to +208% annualized returns, 53-95% win rates, and profit factors up to 25.83, with equity growth from $3,800 to $25,800. Explore these for tailored trading styles and real-time insights.
CL, KMB, and MDLZ operate in consumer staples but diverge in focus: CL emphasizes oral care for recession-resistant demand, KMB personal hygiene with high volume essentials, and MDLZ snacks vulnerable to discretionary spending and commodity swings like cocoa. Growth drivers favor CL's 5.7% revenue CAGR over KMB's 2.2%, while MDLZ contends with muted forecasts. Recent momentum lifts CL YTD, versus peers' lags; risk factors include inflation for all, amplified for MDLZ by costs. KMB's lower P/E and yield contrast CL's premium stability and MDLZ's valuation sensitivity. Sentiment tilts toward essentials over treats in uncertain times.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CL for its consistent trend, earnings beats, dividend growth, and relative YTD strength in a volatile environment. While KMB offers value and yield, and MDLZ potential from undervaluation, CL's superior revenue momentum and stability position it probabilistically ahead amid consumer staples rotation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MDLZ’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MDLZ’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.01% , and MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price fluctuated -0.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.27%.
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.97% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CL | KMB | MDLZ | |
| Capitalization | 67B | 32.7B | 73.6B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 3.11B | 4.97B |
| Gain YTD | 7.016 | -1.123 | 7.387 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.76 | 20.28 | 30.32 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 16.4B | 38.5B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 774M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 7.3B | 21.8B |
CL | KMB | MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 60 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 11 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 62 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 53 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (80) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KMB (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and significantly faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
CL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KMB (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CL (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KMB (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | KMB | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 43% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 43% | 9 days ago 48% | 9 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 52% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 39% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||