CL
Price
$83.53
Change
-$2.28 (-2.66%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
67.02B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMB
Price
$98.54
Change
-$0.30 (-0.30%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
32.71B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$57.31
Change
+$0.06 (+0.10%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
73.55B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL or KMB or MDLZ

Header iconCL vs KMB vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts CL vs KMB vs MDLZBanner chart's image
CL vs KMB vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs. Mondelez International (MDLZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CL has shown year-to-date gains of around 13%, outperforming peers amid strong Q4 earnings and a dividend increase to $0.53 per share.
  • KMB offers a compelling 5.15% dividend yield but trails with negative YTD returns of about -1%, reflecting slower growth and a 26% one-year decline.
  • MDLZ faces headwinds from cocoa costs and muted sales forecasts, with shares down over recent months despite a 3.64% yield and perceived 18% undervaluation.
  • Consumer staples sector provides defensive positioning, but CL leads in momentum and revenue growth at 5.7% annually versus KMB's 2.2%.
  • Valuations show KMB at a lower P/E of around 20x, potentially undervalued by 14-44%, while CL trades at 34x with stronger fundamentals.
  • Recent market volatility highlights relative stability in essentials like oral care over snacks amid inflation and consumer shifts.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company), KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation), and MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.), all key players in consumer staples. These companies produce essential goods—oral care, personal hygiene, and snacks—offering resilience in volatile markets. Investors seeking defensive positions with dividends and growth potential, or traders eyeing relative performance in recent market activity, will find value in understanding their business models, momentum, and sector dynamics. Amid inflation concerns and shifting consumer spending, this analysis highlights contrasts in recent trends and positioning.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive Company is a global leader in oral, personal, and home care products, with brands like Colgate toothpaste dominant in over 200 countries. In recent market activity, CL shares have displayed resilience, posting YTD gains near 13% and trading around $90. Q4 2025 earnings beat estimates with $0.95 EPS and $5.23 billion revenue, up 5.8% year-over-year, driven by steady demand for essentials in Latin America and Europe. A quarterly dividend hike to $0.53 per share bolstered sentiment, despite broader concerns over inflation and oil prices impacting consumer spending. Trading above key moving averages, CL reflects positive momentum from earnings strength and strategic investments, though monthly fluctuations highlight sector volatility.

KMB Overview and Recent Performance

Kimberly-Clark Corporation manufactures personal care items like Huggies diapers, Kleenex tissues, and Depend incontinence products, serving over 175 countries. KMB shares, around $99, have faced pressure with YTD declines near -1% and a 26% drop over the past year, trading at a P/E of about 20x. Recent weeks saw mixed results amid slowing revenue growth and margin challenges from competition and demand shifts. A 5.15% dividend yield attracts income seekers, supported by leadership changes and innovation focus. Analysts view it as undervalued by up to 44%, with fair value estimates around $119, though broader economic headwinds like inflation weigh on performance.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International, Inc. is a snack giant with brands like Oreo and Cadbury, operating in 160 countries. MDLZ shares near $55 have declined in recent months, with 1-month drops around 9-12% and YTD mixed at about 2-6%, reflecting cocoa price volatility and weak demand. A 3.64% dividend yield persists, but Q4 forecasts indicate flat-to-2% organic growth due to price hikes deterring shoppers. Investments like CHF 65 million in Toblerone production aim at premium segments, yet P/E near 30x signals caution amid consumer shifts. Undervaluation estimates of 18% offer appeal, balanced by input cost pressures.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers. These bots are selected by AI for superior adaptation to current market conditions, featuring diverse strategies across sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, and consumer staples. Standouts include a multi-sector bot with +130% annualized return, 62% win rate, and 2.68 profit factor over 25 tickers; a leveraged ETF bot at +110% annualized, 70% win rate; and a consumer staples bot yielding +23% annualized on COST, NFLX, HD, PG with 72% win rate and 7.35 profit factor. Performance ranges span +17% to +208% annualized returns, 53-95% win rates, and profit factors up to 25.83, with equity growth from $3,800 to $25,800. Explore these for tailored trading styles and real-time insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CL, KMB, and MDLZ operate in consumer staples but diverge in focus: CL emphasizes oral care for recession-resistant demand, KMB personal hygiene with high volume essentials, and MDLZ snacks vulnerable to discretionary spending and commodity swings like cocoa. Growth drivers favor CL's 5.7% revenue CAGR over KMB's 2.2%, while MDLZ contends with muted forecasts. Recent momentum lifts CL YTD, versus peers' lags; risk factors include inflation for all, amplified for MDLZ by costs. KMB's lower P/E and yield contrast CL's premium stability and MDLZ's valuation sensitivity. Sentiment tilts toward essentials over treats in uncertain times.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CL for its consistent trend, earnings beats, dividend growth, and relative YTD strength in a volatile environment. While KMB offers value and yield, and MDLZ potential from undervaluation, CL's superior revenue momentum and stability position it probabilistically ahead amid consumer staples rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $83.53KMB: $98.54MDLZ: $57.31)
Brand notoriety: CL and MDLZ are notable and KMB is not notable
CL and KMB are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and MDLZ is in the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 84%, KMB: 79%, MDLZ: 59%
Market capitalization -- CL: $67.02B, KMB: $32.71B, MDLZ: $73.55B
$CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $67.02B. $KMB’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $32.71B. $MDLZ [@Food: Specialty/Candy] has a market capitalization of $ $73.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $335.79B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $ $73.55B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $ $14.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MDLZ’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than CL and MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MDLZ’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the short-term than CL, which in turn is a better option than MDLZ.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.01% , and MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price fluctuated -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.97% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($73.6B) has a higher market cap than CL($67B) and KMB($32.7B). CL and MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than KMB: CL (31.76) and MDLZ (30.32) vs KMB (20.28). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 7.387 vs. CL (7.016) and KMB (-1.123). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.97B vs. CL (3.96B) and KMB (3.11B). KMB has less debt than CL and MDLZ: KMB (7.3B) vs CL (8.55B) and MDLZ (21.8B). MDLZ has higher revenues than CL and KMB: MDLZ (38.5B) vs CL (20.4B) and KMB (16.4B).
CLKMBMDLZ
Capitalization67B32.7B73.6B
EBITDA3.96B3.11B4.97B
Gain YTD7.016-1.1237.387
P/E Ratio31.7620.2830.32
Revenue20.4B16.4B38.5B
Total CashN/A774MN/A
Total Debt8.55B7.3B21.8B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs KMB vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
CL
KMB
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
106017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7010080
SMR RATING
1..100
51172
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
576259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
465324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (80) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KMB (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and significantly faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KMB (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CL (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KMB (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKMBMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAIL49.863.06
+6.54%
Direxion Daily Hmbldrs&Supls Bull 3X ETF
SOUX23.131.25
+5.72%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SOUN ETF
MBOX38.060.06
+0.15%
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
JHDV41.93N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
ACWX74.19-0.28
-0.38%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
-0.30%
CL - KMB
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
PG - KMB
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
CLX - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
CHD - KMB
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
KVUE - KMB
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.10%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
More