CL
Price
$86.04
Change
+$0.49 (+0.57%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
69.03B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KO
Price
$78.18
Change
+$0.89 (+1.15%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
336.5B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$59.09
Change
+$0.26 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
75.84B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL or KO or MDLZ

Header iconCL vs KO vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts CL vs KO vs MDLZBanner chart's image
CL vs KO vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Coca-Cola (KO) vs. Mondelez International (MDLZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CL has shown robust year-to-date gains of around 19%, driven by strong Q4 earnings beats and emerging markets growth, outperforming peers in recent momentum.
  • KO offers steady performance with 10% YTD returns, bolstered by a 63rd consecutive dividend increase and reliable organic revenue growth.
  • MDLZ lags with 8% YTD gains, facing headwinds from rising input costs and cautious 2026 growth forecasts despite solid Q4 results.
  • All three maintain attractive dividend yields above 2%, with CL at 2.22%, KO near 2.9%, and MDLZ at 3.4%, appealing for income-focused investors.
  • Consumer staples sector exposure provides defensive positioning, but CL and KO exhibit stronger relative stability amid market volatility.
  • Valuation metrics show KO at a relatively lower P/E compared to MDLZ, balancing growth and affordability.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), KO (Coca-Cola), and MDLZ (Mondelez International), all prominent consumer staples companies with global brands in oral care, beverages, and snacks. These stocks appeal to traders seeking relative performance insights and investors prioritizing dividend stability and defensive qualities in volatile markets. By analyzing recent earnings, momentum, and sector dynamics, this article highlights contrasts in growth drivers and risk profiles, aiding decisions on market positioning amid economic uncertainties.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a leader in oral, personal, and home care products, benefits from essential demand and a dominant 41% global toothpaste market share. In recent market activity, the stock has delivered strong year-to-date returns near 19%, with shares trading around $93.56 within a 52-week range of $74.55-$100.18. Q4 2025 results exceeded expectations, posting revenue of $5.23 billion (up 5.8% year-over-year) and adjusted EPS of $0.95, fueled by 4.5% organic growth in emerging markets and AI-driven productivity gains. Sentiment remains positive on resilient demand for staples, though CEO share sales and oil price pressures introduce caution. Analysts maintain a Buy consensus with a $97 target.

KO Overview and Recent Performance

Coca-Cola (KO), the world's largest non-alcoholic beverage maker, leverages its iconic brands and global distribution. Recent performance shows steady YTD gains of about 10%, with shares near $77 amid a 52-week range of $65.35-$82.00. The company reported 2025 net revenue of $47.9 billion (up 2%) and full-year EPS of $3.04, supported by 5% organic growth and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar volume surges. A 4% dividend hike to $0.53 quarterly marks the 64th consecutive increase, enhancing appeal. Leadership transitions and digital focus bolster sentiment, though tariff risks linger. Analysts project 7-8% EPS growth for 2026.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International (MDLZ), known for snacks like Oreo and Cadbury, operates in growing indulgence categories. Shares have risen about 8% YTD, trading at $58.40 in a 52-week range of $51.20-$71.15. Q4 2025 revenue hit $10.50 billion (up 9.3%), with normalized EPS of $0.72 beating estimates, but rising cocoa and input costs temper outlook. Organic sales growth is projected flat to 2% for 2026, with M&A challenges noted. Dividend yield stands at 3.4%, yet stock underperforms peers post-earnings. Mixed analyst views reflect competitive pressures, with a Moderate Buy rating and $66.88 target.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, hedging, and volatility plays, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 62 days. Standouts include annualized returns ranging from +14% to over +215%, win rates of 53% to 95%, and profit factors up to 25.83. Only those excelling in current conditions—such as aerospace/defense bots with 70-80% wins or semiconductor plays near 100% returns—earn trending status. Explore these for real-time signals and customizable risk options to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CL, KO, and MDLZ share consumer staples resilience but diverge in business models: CL focuses on hygiene essentials with emerging market leverage, KO on beverages via franchised bottling for capital efficiency, and MDLZ on snacks exposed to commodity volatility like cocoa. Growth drivers favor CL's 4-5% organic sales and AI efficiencies over MDLZ's muted projections. Recent momentum tilts to CL (19% YTD) and KO (10%) versus MDLZ (8%). Risks include input inflation for all, but MDLZ faces higher sensitivity. Valuation shows KO's P/E edge; sentiment strongest for dividend aristocrats CL and KO.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor CL for its superior trend consistency, earnings momentum, and emerging markets catalysts positioning it ahead in relative performance. KO ranks closely with stability and dividend reliability, while MDLZ trails on cost pressures. This probabilistic edge reflects observable factors like YTD outperformance and analyst targets, though market shifts could alter dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $86.04KO: $78.18MDLZ: $59.09)
Brand notoriety: CL, KO and MDLZ are all notable
CL represents the Household/Personal Care industry, KO is part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, and MDLZ is in the Food: Specialty/Candy industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 82%, KO: 86%, MDLZ: 70%
Market capitalization -- CL: $69.03B, KO: $336.5B, MDLZ: $75.84B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $69.03B. KO’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $336.5B. MDLZ [@Food: Specialty/Candy] has a market capitalization of $75.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $340.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $336.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $75.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $15.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MDLZ’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KO is a better buy in the long-term than CL, which in turn is a better option than MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MDLZ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than CL, which in turn is a better option than KO.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.90% , and MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price fluctuated +2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

KO is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KO($336B) has a higher market cap than MDLZ($75.8B) and CL($69B). CL and MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than KO: CL (32.71) and MDLZ (31.26) vs KO (25.72). KO YTD gains are higher at: 12.598 vs. MDLZ (10.722) and CL (9.551). KO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.7B vs. MDLZ (4.97B) and CL (3.96B). CL has less debt than MDLZ and KO: CL (8.55B) vs MDLZ (21.8B) and KO (45.5B). KO has higher revenues than MDLZ and CL: KO (47.9B) vs MDLZ (38.5B) and CL (20.4B).
CLKOMDLZ
Capitalization69B336B75.8B
EBITDA3.96B18.7B4.97B
Gain YTD9.55112.59810.722
P/E Ratio32.7125.7231.26
Revenue20.4B47.9B38.5B
Total Cash1.29BN/AN/A
Total Debt8.55B45.5B21.8B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs KO vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
CL
KO
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
621319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63971
SMR RATING
1..100
52071
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
563453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
337018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as KO (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to KO’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KO's stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KO (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KO’s and significantly faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

KO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CL (33) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (70) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKOMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UJB78.491.07
+1.38%
ProShares Ultra High Yield
SVAL37.930.34
+0.91%
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
GLD437.913.38
+0.78%
SPDR® Gold Shares
FTXR39.750.25
+0.62%
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
TRSY30.12N/A
N/A
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.44%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More