This comparison examines CL, MDLZ, and PG, leading consumer staples firms in oral care, snacks, and household essentials. These defensive stocks attract investors seeking stability amid market volatility, offering essential products with resilient demand. Traders may value their relative performance for sector rotation, while long-term holders appreciate dividend reliability and brand strength. Recent quarters reveal contrasts in earnings momentum, cost management, and growth drivers, aiding decisions on market positioning and stock comparison.
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) is a global leader in oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition, commanding ~41% toothpaste market share. In recent market activity, CL stock has shown strength, with YTD gains of 18-21% and a market cap around $75B. Q4 2025 results beat expectations, featuring 5.8% revenue growth to $5.23B and adjusted EPS of $0.95, fueled by 4.5% organic growth in emerging markets and AI-driven productivity. Gross margins hit 60.3%, supporting sentiment amid essential demand resilience. Trading near $93-95, recent weeks reflect outperformance versus broader indices, influenced by institutional buying and core holding appeal despite competition.
Mondelez International (MDLZ) specializes in snacks like Oreo, Cadbury, and Milka, holding top positions in biscuits and chocolate across 150+ countries. Recent performance has been mixed, with YTD returns around 8% and a ~$75B market cap. Shares trade near $58, down over the past year amid declining volumes and rising input costs. Q4 earnings met expectations but prompted a cautious 2026 outlook due to price hikes deterring shoppers and macroeconomic uncertainty. Dividend yield stands at ~3.4%, bolstering appeal, though stock dipped post-earnings on sales concerns. Sentiment reflects challenges in confectionery versus staples' stability.
Procter & Gamble (PG) dominates household and personal care with brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette, serving 5B consumers via a focused portfolio. YTD performance hovers at 7-8%, with shares around $153-154 and a massive ~$360B market cap. Recent quarters showed 1.5% revenue growth to $22.21B in line with estimates, amid Mr. Clean innovations and a 70-year dividend increase streak yielding ~2.7%. Margin pressures from commodities and tariffs persist, yet organic sales and e-commerce expansion sustain resilience. Trading reflects defensive positioning despite broader declines.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only those excelling in current volatility—such as trend-following in semiconductors or hedging in energy—earn a spot, with stats like annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors reaching 25+. For instance, bots in aerospace delivered +98% returns at 72% win rates, while multi-ticker strategies across 25 assets hit +135% with 62% wins. These vary from 5-minute signals to longer holds, including one featuring PG. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to today’s market for potential outperformance.
CL, MDLZ, and PG operate in consumer staples but diverge in focus: CL on oral/personal care, MDLZ on indulgent snacks, PG on broad household essentials. Growth drivers contrast—CL's emerging markets versus MDLZ's volume pressures and PG's innovation. Recent momentum favors CL (YTD +18-21%), over MDLZ (+8%) and PG (+7%). Risks include costs for all, but MDLZ faces discretionary sensitivity. PG's scale offers stability, CL agility. Valuations: PG cheapest at ~23x P/E, CL premium ~35x on growth. Sentiment tilts to essentials over snacks in uncertainty.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CL based on superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and catalysts like emerging growth and productivity gains. Its relative positioning in resilient oral care, versus MDLZ's cost/volumes issues and PG's scale-stability trade-off, suggests higher probability of near-term upside in defensive rotations.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.69% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +2.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CL | MDLZ | PG | |
| Capitalization | 69B | 75.8B | 341B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 4.97B | 24.5B |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 10.722 | 3.064 |
| P/E Ratio | 32.71 | 31.26 | 21.73 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 38.5B | 85.3B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | N/A | 10.8B |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 21.8B | 36.6B |
CL | MDLZ | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 19 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 71 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 71 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 53 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 18 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PG’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to PG’s and significantly faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CL (33) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (76) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | MDLZ | PG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 10 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 36% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDTS | 21.55 | 0.12 | +0.56% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF -Sep | |||
| DFAU | 47.12 | 0.26 | +0.55% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | |||
| FAB | 97.08 | 0.43 | +0.44% |
| First Trust Multi Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| LJAN | 24.50 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jan | |||
| VUSE | 65.38 | 0.05 | +0.08% |
| Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||