Advertisement
CL or MNST or PM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Philip Morris International (PM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CL exhibits stability with a recent dividend increase and YTD gains of nearly 12%, supported by strong Q4 earnings and emerging market strength, though facing mixed analyst sentiment amid volatility.
- MNST delivered robust Q4 sales growth of 17.6% but experienced a post-earnings pullback, trading at a higher P/E of around 40 amid competitive pressures in energy drinks.
- PM leads in market cap and dividend yield at over 3.5%, with solid YTD performance of 7.23% and focus on smoke-free products, despite a recent earnings-related dip.
- Valuation contrasts show PM's attractive P/E near 23 versus higher multiples for CL (33) and MNST (40), highlighting trade-offs in growth and stability.
- Recent market activity reveals CL and PM outperforming MNST YTD, with consumer staples resilience amid geopolitical tensions.
- Sector exposures differ: household essentials for CL, beverages for MNST, and tobacco transition for PM.
Introduction
This stock comparison evaluates Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a leader in oral and personal care; Monster Beverage (MNST), a dynamic energy drink provider; and Philip Morris International (PM), advancing in smoke-free products. These consumer staples firms offer insights into relative performance, valuation, and market positioning amid recent volatility from geopolitical tensions and economic shifts. Traders seeking momentum and investors prioritizing dividends or stability will find value in analyzing their recent earnings beats, growth trajectories, and risk profiles for informed portfolio decisions.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global consumer goods giant focused on oral care, personal care, and pet nutrition, has demonstrated resilience in recent market activity. Trading around $88 with a market cap of $70.5 billion, CL posted YTD gains of nearly 12% and a P/E of 33.44. In recent weeks, the company announced a quarterly dividend increase to $0.53 per share, extending its long streak, alongside updates to its 2030 growth plan emphasizing emerging markets and AI-driven productivity. Q4 2025 earnings exceeded expectations with $5.23 billion in revenue (up 5.8% YoY) and EPS of $0.95, though broader volatility from oil prices and geopolitics has led to mixed analyst views. Low beta of 0.26 underscores its defensive appeal, with sentiment buoyed by gross margin expansion guidance for 2026.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage (MNST) specializes in energy drinks and strategic brands, operating in a competitive beverage sector. At about $77 per share and a $75.3 billion market cap, MNST shows flat YTD performance at 0.42% with a P/E of 39.69. Recent quarters highlighted strength, with Q4 2025 net sales surging 17.6% to $2.13 billion and adjusted EPS at $0.51, beating estimates amid resilient demand for Monster Energy products. International sales contributed significantly, up 26.9% outside the U.S. However, post-earnings pullbacks reflect concerns over costs like aluminum and competition, prompting views of the dip as a buying opportunity by analysts like Jefferies. Early 2026 sales trends remain positive, supporting long-term growth narratives despite higher valuation multiples.
PM Overview and Recent Performance
Philip Morris International (PM) leads in combustibles and is pivoting to smoke-free products like IQOS and Zyn. With shares near $172 and a dominant $260 billion-plus market cap, PM has YTD returns of 7.23% and the lowest P/E at 23 among peers. Recent performance includes a regular $1.47 quarterly dividend and Q4 2025 results with $10.36 billion revenue and EPS of $1.70 meeting estimates, alongside reaffirmed 2026 EPS growth of 11-13%. A post-earnings dip of 5.7% tied to minor misses and debt issues was offset by nicotine pouch momentum. Beta of 0.40 and 3.5% yield enhance its income appeal, with sentiment positive on ESG initiatives like veteran donations amid market turbulence.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each applying machine-learning across thousands of tickers in diverse styles, strategies, timeframes like 5-60 minutes, and sectors from semiconductors to consumer staples. Only those excelling in current conditions—such as volatility or momentum—earn a spot, with stats showcasing annualized returns up to +216%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors reaching 25+. Examples include bots on oil/semiconductors with +91% returns and 60% wins, or multi-ticker agents at +132% annualized. These tools generate real-time signals for copy trading, adapting to market shifts. Traders can explore this curated selection to align bots with strategies like those for CL, MNST, or PM.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models diverge: CL's essentials ensure steady demand versus MNST's growth-oriented beverages and PM's regulatory-sensitive tobacco transition. Growth drivers include CL's emerging markets, MNST's international energy sales, and PM's smoke-free shift. Recent momentum favors CL (12% YTD) over flat MNST, with PM at 7%. Risk factors: low-beta defensives CL (0.26) and PM (0.40) versus MNST's competition; PM faces regulatory hurdles. Valuation sensitivity shows PM's compelling P/E (23) and 3.5% yield against pricier MNST (40, no dividend) and CL (33, 2.4% yield). Market sentiment tilts toward stability in staples amid uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PM based on trend consistency in smoke-free catalysts, superior relative positioning with the lowest P/E, highest market cap, and strong dividend support amid staples resilience. Its 7%+ YTD gains and reaffirmed growth outlook suggest probabilistic outperformance over CL's stability and MNST's volatility, though all warrant monitoring for sector rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.32% , and PM (@Tobacco) price fluctuated -1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2073.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
PM is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.77% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Tobacco (-1.34% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
| CL | MNST | PM | |
| Capitalization | 68.8B | 75B | 246B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 2.53B | 17.5B |
| Gain YTD | 9.258 | 0.065 | -0.749 |
| P/E Ratio | 32.63 | 39.55 | 21.72 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 8.29B | 40.6B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 2.77B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 199M | 48.8B |
CL | MNST | PM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 64 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 24 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 35 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 53 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 62 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PM's Valuation (23) in the Tobacco industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PM's stock grew significantly faster than MNST’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
PM's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MNST (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
PM's SMR Rating (3) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as CL (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as PM (61) in the Tobacco industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to PM’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MNST (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PM (81) in the Tobacco industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than PM’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | MNST | PM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 51% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVNM | 82.67 | 1.11 | +1.36% |
| Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| SNTH | 28.56 | 0.34 | +1.19% |
| MRP Synthequity ETF | |||
| SPTL | 26.44 | 0.24 | +0.92% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio L/T Trs ETF | |||
| BDVG | 13.52 | 0.12 | +0.90% |
| iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| PSTP | 35.88 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
| Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Stgy ETF | |||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||