CL
Price
$85.81
Change
+$2.19 (+2.62%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
68.85B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MO
Price
$64.17
Change
-$0.77 (-1.19%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
107.25B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$146.93
Change
+$3.82 (+2.67%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
341.47B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL or MO or PG

Header iconCL vs MO vs PG Comparison
Open Charts CL vs MO vs PGBanner chart's image
CL vs MO vs PG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Altria Group (MO) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MO leads YTD performance at 17.74%, outpacing CL's 13.12% and PG's 5.87%, driven by high dividend yield and analyst upgrades.
  • MO offers the highest dividend yield at 6.25%, compared to PG's 2.81% and CL's 2.39%, appealing to income-focused investors.
  • PG boasts the largest market cap at $352B, with a lower trailing P/E of 22.32 versus CL's 33.78, indicating relative value in consumer staples.
  • Recent dividend hikes for CL (to $0.53/share) and steady payouts across all three underscore defensive stability amid market volatility.
  • MO and PG show resilient earnings beats, while CL benefits from strong Q4 results and Latin America growth.

Introduction

Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Altria Group (MO), and Procter & Gamble (PG) represent stalwart names in consumer staples, offering essential products from oral care and household goods to tobacco. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, dividend reliability, and valuation amid economic uncertainty and sector rotation toward defensives. Traders seeking momentum and income investors prioritizing yields will find value in evaluating relative strength, as these stocks navigate inflation pressures and shifting consumer sentiment in recent market activity.

CL Overview and Recent Performance

Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global leader in oral, personal, and home care products, has demonstrated resilience with shares trading around $88.84 and a market cap of $71.21B. In recent weeks, the stock has shown YTD gains of 13.12%, supported by a Q4 earnings beat (EPS $0.95 vs. $0.91 expected) and robust Latin America sales growth of 12.8%. A quarterly dividend increase to $0.53 per share, marking 63 years of raises, has bolstered sentiment. Analysts maintain a "Moderate Buy" rating with a $97.21 target, reflecting optimism in strategic investments despite input cost pressures. Low beta (0.26) highlights its defensive positioning.

MO Overview and Recent Performance

Altria Group (MO), primarily known for its Marlboro cigarettes via Philip Morris USA, trades near $67.89 with a $113.97B market cap. Recent market activity has propelled YTD returns to 17.74%, outperforming peers amid volatility. High dividend yield of 6.25% ($4.24 annual) and UBS price target hike to $74 underpin strength, with reaffirmed "Buy" ratings citing stable cigarette volumes. Q4 EPS met expectations closely ($1.30 vs. $1.32), and a $1.06 quarterly payout signals commitment to shareholders. Beta of 0.43 offers moderate stability in tobacco's defensive sector.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

Procter & Gamble (PG), the world's largest consumer products maker with brands like Tide and Pampers, commands a $352.59B market cap and shares at $150.65. YTD performance stands at 5.87%, lagging slightly due to softer volumes, but Q2 FY26 EPS beat ($1.88 vs. $1.86) and 2% organic sales growth provide support. Dividend yield of 2.81% ($4.23 annual) reflects 70 years of increases. Analysts' "Moderate Buy" consensus targets $168, emphasizing brand strength despite tariff and inflation headwinds. Beta of 0.34 reinforces its staple appeal.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—like those in semiconductors, energy, and consumer staples—earn a spot among the 25 featured out of 351 total. Stats highlight prowess: annualized returns from 16.76% to 209.56%, win rates 52.61%-94.92%, profit factors 1.57-25.83, and drawdowns as low as $1,566. Bots employ AI/ML for trend-following, hedging, and swing trades on 5min-60min frames, including consumer staples like COST/NFLX/HD/PG (71.75% win rate, +23.06% annualized). Explore these for data-driven edges in today's market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CL, MO, and PG anchor consumer staples but diverge in models: CL and PG thrive on broad household essentials with global reach, while MO relies on U.S. tobacco amid volume declines offset by pricing. Growth drivers favor CL's emerging markets vs. PG's mature portfolios and MO's smokeless shift. Recent momentum crowns MO (17.74% YTD), with CL close behind; PG trails on volume softness. Risks include regulatory pressures for MO, costs for all. PG's scale yields superior EBITDA ($24.5B); valuations show MO cheapest (P/E 16.48), PG balanced (22.32), CL premium (33.78). Sentiment tilts positive across, with upgrades.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MO for its superior trend consistency, highest yield (6.25%), leading YTD momentum (17.74%), and attractive forward P/E (12.11), positioning it well in defensive rotations. CL follows closely on earnings strength, while PG offers scale but lags relatively. Probabilistic edge to MO amid volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2026
Stock price -- (CL: $85.81MO: $64.17PG: $146.93)
Brand notoriety: CL, MO and PG are all notable
CL and PG are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and MO is in the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 118%, MO: 112%, PG: 132%
Market capitalization -- CL: $68.85B, MO: $107.25B, PG: $341.47B
$CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $68.85B. $PG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $341.47B. $MO [@Tobacco] has a market capitalization of $ $107.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $341.47B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $ $245.92B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $ $32.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMO’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MO’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MO is a better buy in the long-term than CL and PG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CL and MO are a better buy in the short-term than PG.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while MO (@Tobacco) price change was -4.76% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

MO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Tobacco (-1.34% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($341B) has a higher market cap than MO($107B) and CL($68.8B). CL has higher P/E ratio than PG and MO: CL (32.63) vs PG (21.77) and MO (15.58). MO YTD gains are higher at: 13.155 vs. CL (9.258) and PG (3.254). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. MO (10.8B) and CL (3.96B). CL has less debt than MO and PG: CL (8.55B) vs MO (25.7B) and PG (36.6B). PG has higher revenues than CL and MO: PG (85.3B) vs CL (20.4B) and MO (20.1B).
CLMOPG
Capitalization68.8B107B341B
EBITDA3.96B10.8B24.5B
Gain YTD9.25813.1553.254
P/E Ratio32.6315.5821.77
Revenue20.4B20.1B85.3B
Total Cash1.29BN/A10.8B
Total Debt8.55B25.7B36.6B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs MO vs PG: Fundamental Ratings
CL
MO
PG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
715651
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
651454
SMR RATING
1..100
5930
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
573459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
431581
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MO's Valuation (8) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to PG’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MO's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MO (9) in the Tobacco industry, and is in the same range as PG (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to MO’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as CL (57) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

MO's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as CL (43) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PG (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to CL’s and significantly faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLMOPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCTE27.440.56
+2.10%
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF
SPHQ80.501.37
+1.73%
Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF
HCOW24.000.27
+1.15%
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
SMOG149.381.24
+0.84%
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
YYY11.580.09
+0.78%
Amplify CEF High Income ETF

CL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CL
1D Price
Change %
CL100%
+2.62%
PG - CL
70%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
CHD - CL
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
CLX - CL
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
UL - CL
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
KMB - CL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More