This stock comparison examines CL (Colgate-Palmolive), PEP (PepsiCo), and UL (Unilever), all stalwarts in the consumer staples sector known for essential products like oral care, beverages, and household goods. These companies offer stability amid market turbulence, with low betas and reliable dividends. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors pursuing long-term income or defensive positioning will find value in analyzing their recent relative performance, growth drivers, and sector exposure. In the current environment of geopolitical risks and inflation pressures, understanding their contrasts aids informed portfolio decisions.
Colgate-Palmolive (CL), a global leader in oral, personal, home care, and pet nutrition products, operates with a market cap of $68.36B. Shares trade around $85.20, within a 52-week range of $74.55-$99.33. Recent market activity has been choppy, with 8.48% YTD gains but -10.24% over the past month amid broader consumer goods sell-offs. Sentiment has improved following a Deutsche Bank upgrade to Buy, citing a strong core franchise and growth potential despite legal challenges and volatility from rising oil prices. Emerging markets, comprising 45% of sales, drove Q4 organic growth, supporting a 2.47% dividend yield and low beta of 0.26.
PepsiCo (PEP), a multinational in beverages and snacks, boasts a $214.22B market cap. Trading near $156.77 in a 52-week range of $127.60-$171.48, it has delivered top YTD returns of 10.17% with 4.14% over five days, though -4.91% monthly. Influences include solid earnings beats, a 54th consecutive dividend increase to 3.63% yield, and sustainability efforts amid high oil prices. International segments offset North American softness, with a beta of 0.38 underscoring defensive appeal. Analyst optimism, like Deutsche Bank's Buy rating targeting $169, bolsters positive sentiment.
Unilever (UL), spanning beauty, personal care, home care, and foods with brands like Dove and Hellmann's, holds a $131.06B market cap. Shares at $59.98 sit in a 52-week range of $59.37-$74.98, reflecting YTD declines of 7.59% and -16.41% monthly. Recent weakness stems from U.S./European slowdowns, but advanced talks to merge its foods business with McCormick—potentially creating a $60B entity—have sparked optimism. A 3.70% dividend yield and beta of 0.26 provide stability, with emerging market resilience aiding underlying sales growth.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—factoring in volatility, trends, and sectors—earn a spot among the 25 trending bots out of 351 total. These bots employ diverse strategies like pattern recognition, momentum trading, and risk-managed swing approaches on timeframes from 5-minute to daily charts. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to 279% in select portfolios, with win rates reaching 90% in leveraged ETFs and low-drawdown models in sectors like tech and industrials. Users can filter by risk level (low to high), asset class, and analysis type for copy trading. Explore these tools to enhance your strategy in dynamic markets like consumer staples.
CL, PEP, and UL share consumer staples' defensive models, focusing on recession-resistant essentials, but diverge in portfolios: CL emphasizes oral/pet care (emerging markets heavy), PEP beverages/snacks (international balance), and UL diversified FMCG (foods spin-off potential). Growth drivers include CL's pricing power and PEP's volume recovery versus UL's merger catalyst. Recent momentum favors PEP (10.17% YTD) over CL (8.48%) and UL (-7.59%), amid oil/geopolitical risks. All boast low betas (0.23-0.38), but UL offers cheapest valuation (20.06 P/E) with highest yield (3.70%), trading risks from restructuring. Sentiment tilts positive for upgraded CL/PEP, while UL hinges on M&A (mergers and acquisitions).
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PEP due to superior trend consistency (leading YTD returns), stability (lowest relative drawdowns), and catalysts like dividend hikes amid volatility. Its balanced exposure and analyst upgrades position it probabilistically stronger than CL's growth narrative or UL's M&A uncertainty for near-term outperformance in consumer staples.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.31% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.
CL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CL | PEP | UL | |
| Capitalization | 69B | 215B | 126B |
| EBITDA | 3.96B | 15.5B | 11.3B |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 10.714 | -9.930 |
| P/E Ratio | 32.71 | 26.25 | 19.31 |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 93.9B | 59.8B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 9.53B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 8.55B | 49.9B | N/A |
CL | PEP | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 57 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 55 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 22 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 52 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 35 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (98) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to UL’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (5) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CL (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CL's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
| CL | PEP | UL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 31% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 45% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 43% | 9 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 52% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 36% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDTS | 21.55 | 0.12 | +0.56% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF -Sep | |||
| DFAU | 47.12 | 0.26 | +0.55% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | |||
| FAB | 97.08 | 0.43 | +0.44% |
| First Trust Multi Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| LJAN | 24.50 | 0.05 | +0.22% |
| Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jan | |||
| VUSE | 65.38 | 0.05 | +0.08% |
| Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | |||