This comparison examines CleanSpark (CLSK), Coinbase (COIN), and The Trade Desk (TTD) amid volatile markets in 2026. CLSK and COIN represent cryptocurrency-linked plays—mining and exchange services—while TTD offers adtech infrastructure. Traders seeking high-momentum crypto bets or balanced growth in digital advertising will find value here. Recent sector shifts, including Bitcoin rallies and ad spend fluctuations, highlight their divergent paths, aiding decisions on relative performance and positioning.
CleanSpark (CLSK) operates sustainable Bitcoin mining facilities powered by renewable energy sources. In recent weeks, the stock has surged over 30% monthly, outpacing broader markets, driven by operational expansions like a 300 MW Texas data center and record 658 Bitcoin mined in March 2026. YTD gains exceed 20%, with a market cap around $3.2 billion and high beta of 3.72 reflecting crypto volatility. Sentiment has strengthened on rising Bitcoin prices and efficiency gains, though profitability challenges persist, contributing to no current P/E ratio.
Coinbase (COIN) is a leading cryptocurrency exchange platform offering trading, custody, and staking services. Shares have climbed about 17% in recent monthly trading, fueled by crypto market recovery, stablecoin regulatory tailwinds, and elevated volumes ahead of Q1 earnings. YTD performance stands at roughly 9%, with a $50+ billion market cap and beta near 3.4 underscoring sensitivity to digital asset trends. Positive analyst views and trading above its 50-day simple moving average (SMA) have bolstered sentiment, trading at a P/E of about 46.
The Trade Desk (TTD) provides a demand-side platform (DSP) for programmatic digital advertising across connected TV, video, and display. Recent weeks show around 9% monthly gains amid analyst upgrades and partnerships, yet YTD declines surpass 36% due to ad market softness. Market cap hovers at $11.4 billion, with a lower beta of 1.1 indicating relative stability, and P/E around 27. Upcoming earnings and innovations support cautious optimism, though macroeconomic pressures weigh on sentiment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for excelling in current volatile conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ AI-driven strategies like multi-agent analysis, trend trading, and take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns of +23% to +162%, win rates 51%–88%, profit factors 1.5–11.7, and trades across 3–18 tickers in sectors like semiconductors and energy. Virtual and brokerage agents include risk management for copy trading. Traders can explore these adaptable tools tailored to diverse styles and market phases.
Business models diverge: CLSK focuses on Bitcoin mining with sustainable energy edges, COIN on exchange volumes and fintech services, and TTD on adtech scalability. Growth drivers include crypto price surges for CLSK/COIN versus TTD’s reliance on digital ad spend. Recent momentum favors CLSK (34% monthly) over COIN (17%) and TTD (9%). Risks are elevated for crypto stocks via high betas (>3) and Bitcoin dependence, while TTD faces cyclical ad pressures but lower volatility. Valuation sensitivity shows COIN and TTD with defined P/E ratios (46 and 27), versus CLSK’s losses. Market sentiment tilts bullish on crypto amid rallies, contrasting TTD’s recovery from YTD lows.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CLSK for its superior trend consistency, operational catalysts like mining expansions, and outperformance in recent volatile markets. COIN offers scale advantages, while TTD provides stability, but CLSK’s relative positioning suggests higher near-term probability of upside continuation based on momentum and sector tailwinds.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TTD’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTD’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +5.00% , and TTD (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price fluctuated -14.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.42%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
COIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
TTD is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.07% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-2.51% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| CLSK | COIN | TTD | |
| Capitalization | 3.46B | 54.7B | 9.94B |
| EBITDA | 139M | 1.29B | 716M |
| Gain YTD | 33.103 | -8.181 | -44.310 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 76.34 | 24.02 |
| Revenue | 785M | 6.56B | 2.97B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 10.7B | 1.41B |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 7.96B | 424M |
CLSK | TTD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as TTD (79) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTD’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TTD (100) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTD’s over the last 12 months.
TTD's SMR Rating (51) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (94) in the null industry. This means that TTD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TTD (65) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTD’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as TTD (99) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to TTD’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | COIN | TTD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 89% | 15 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RLY | 37.40 | 0.19 | +0.51% |
| State Street® Multi-Asset Real Ret ETF | |||
| ESK | 14.29 | N/A | N/A |
| REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | |||
| CIF | 1.62 | -0.01 | -0.77% |
| MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | |||
| IDEF | 32.97 | -0.35 | -1.05% |
| iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | |||
| TMAT | 28.22 | -0.32 | -1.13% |
| Main Thematic Innovation ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | -5.80% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 83% Closely correlated | -5.00% | ||
| RIOT - CLSK | 79% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| KEEL - CLSK | 76% Closely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| MSTR - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -5.88% | ||
| COIN - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COIN | 100% | -4.14% | ||
| AFRM - COIN | 81% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| MSTR - COIN | 81% Closely correlated | -5.88% | ||
| RIOT - COIN | 77% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| U - COIN | 74% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| HOOD - COIN | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTD has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTD jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTD | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| CLSK - TTD | 68% Closely correlated | -5.80% | ||
| COIN - TTD | 66% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| RIOT - TTD | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| SAIL - TTD | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| DDOG - TTD | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||