Advertisement
CLSK or FRSH or HUBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Freshworks (FRSH) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CleanSpark (CLSK), a Bitcoin miner, shows operational growth with nearly 1,800 BTC mined in Q1 2026 and expanding hashrate, amid crypto sector volatility.
- Freshworks (FRSH) achieved full-year GAAP profitability in 2025 and guides 13.5-14.5% revenue growth for 2026, though shares have declined over 30% YTD.
- HubSpot (HUBS) reported improved profitability with Q4 2025 net income of $54.4 million, but faces software sector pressures from AI disruption concerns, down over 60% in the past year.
- CLSK exhibits higher volatility tied to Bitcoin prices, contrasting with steadier but slower growth in FRSH and HUBS SaaS models (Software as a Service).
- Recent weeks show mixed momentum: CLSK with operational gains, while FRSH and HUBS lag amid broader tech pullbacks.
Introduction
This stock comparison evaluates CleanSpark (CLSK), Freshworks (FRSH), and HubSpot (HUBS) amid divergent market dynamics. CLSK represents crypto mining exposure, while FRSH and HUBS offer SaaS platforms for customer engagement and CRM. Traders seeking high-volatility plays versus growth-oriented software may find insights here, particularly with upcoming Q1/Q2 2026 earnings for all three. Relative performance highlights sector contrasts in recent market activity.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark (CLSK) operates as a sustainable Bitcoin mining firm, focusing on low-cost energy data centers. In recent market activity, shares traded around $12.17, down from a 52-week high of $23.61 but above the low of $7.82. Operational updates show robust growth, including 658 BTC mined in March 2026 and a quarterly total nearing 1,800 BTC, with Q1 revenue over $180 million and gross margins above 47%. Sentiment reflects Bitcoin price rebounds and expansions like Texas sites, though volatility persists amid crypto swings. Q2 earnings are set for May 7.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks (FRSH) provides cloud-based customer engagement software, including CRM and support tools. Shares recently hovered near $8.75, reflecting a 52-week range of $6.79-$16.14 and over 30% YTD decline. Recent quarters marked first full-year GAAP profitability and record free cash flow, with 2026 revenue guidance at 13.5-14.5% growth. Q4 2025 EPS beat estimates, but earlier guidance misses pressured sentiment. Investor focus remains on AI integrations and EX segment strength amid SaaS competition. Q1 2026 earnings approach.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot (HUBS) delivers inbound marketing, sales, and CRM software. Trading around $230, shares span a 52-week range of $187.45-$682.57, down over 60% yearly. Q4 2025 revenue hit $846.3 million (up from prior quarter), with net income of $54.4 million signaling profitability gains. Recent activity shows pullbacks amid software sector fears over AI disruption, though peers' earnings lift some optimism. Beta of 1.23 underscores market sensitivity. Q1 2026 results due May 7.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only the most suitable for current volatility—like those yielding up to +162% annualized returns, 51-88% win rates, and profit factors to 11.70—earn spots among the 25 featured. Examples include semiconductor bots (e.g., +96% returns on LRCX, NVDA) and industrials (HUBB exposure). These bots offer diverse risk profiles, from 5-minute scalps to multi-day holds, aiding traders in dynamic markets. Explore Trending AI Robots for data-driven options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark (CLSK)’s mining model drives explosive growth via BTC holdings and hashrate but exposes to crypto risks, unlike FRSH and HUBS subscription SaaS with recurring revenue. Growth drivers diverge: CLSK leverages energy efficiency, while peers emphasize AI-enhanced CRM. Recent momentum favors CLSK’s operational beats over software slowdowns. Risks include CLSK’s volatility (Bitcoin-tied), versus FRSH/HUBS competition and AI threats. Valuations reflect: high multiples for SaaS stability, growth premiums for mining. Sentiment tilts crypto-positive recently.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CLSK, citing consistent operational catalysts like mining expansions and relative resilience in recent crypto rebounds, positioning it favorably against FRSH and HUBS amid SaaS headwinds. Probability favors momentum continuation, though volatility warrants caution.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and HUBS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and HUBS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FRSH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -7.61% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.47% , and HUBS (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +0.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.06% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-4.73% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | FRSH | HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 3.37B | 2.48B | 10.2B |
| EBITDA | 139M | 42.9M | 267M |
| Gain YTD | 29.644 | -26.857 | -50.566 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 14.59 | 104.41 |
| Revenue | 785M | 871M | 3.3B |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 779M | 1.69B |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 38.8M | 247M |
CLSK | FRSH | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 80 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 50 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 60 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 25 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (59) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CLSK (69) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to CLSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to CLSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (85) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (94) in the null industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s and somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FRSH (60) in the Restaurants industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK's stock grew similarly to FRSH’s and somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (84) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s and significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | FRSH | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +6.41% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 67% Closely correlated | +8.13% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 67% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 66% Closely correlated | +8.16% | ||
| NOW - FRSH | 66% Closely correlated | +5.05% | ||
| WDAY - FRSH | 66% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +8.13% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 75% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 74% Closely correlated | +8.16% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | +5.05% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| CLSK - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.15% | ||
More | ||||