Advertisement
CMS or FTS or LNT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs. Fortis Inc. (FTS) vs. Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Alliant Energy (LNT) leads with the strongest year-to-date performance at approximately 16%, outperforming peers in recent market activity.
- CMS Energy reported a Q1 earnings beat with adjusted EPS of $1.13, reaffirming full-year guidance amid rising power demand.
- Fortis (FTS) offers the highest market capitalization at over $29 billion and a dividend yield around 3.2%, providing stability.
- All three stocks maintain attractive dividend yields near 3%, appealing to income-focused investors in the utilities sector.
- Recent sentiment reflects utility sector strength from data center growth, though interest rate sensitivity remains a common risk factor.
- P/E ratios (price-to-earnings ratios) cluster around 21-23, indicating similar valuations relative to earnings.
Introduction
CMS Energy Corporation (CMS), Fortis Inc. (FTS), and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) are prominent regulated electric utilities serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers primarily in the U.S. and Canada. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid rising electricity demand from data centers and electrification trends. Investors seeking stable dividends, defensive exposure, or growth in the utilities sector—especially during volatile market conditions—will find value in understanding their relative strengths, momentum, and risks. All three benefit from regulated operations but differ in geographic focus and growth catalysts.
CMS Overview and Recent Performance
CMS Energy Corporation, headquartered in Michigan, operates electric and gas utilities serving nearly 2 million electric and 1.8 million gas customers. Its segments include regulated electric generation and distribution, gas operations, and clean energy initiatives. In recent weeks, CMS stock has experienced a pullback to around $76, within a 52-week range of $68-$80. Year-to-date gains stand at about 10%, lagging peers slightly. Strong Q1 results with adjusted EPS of $1.13 beat estimates, driven by industrial demand and weather normalization, have supported sentiment. The company reaffirmed full-year guidance and boosted capital plans amid power demand growth, though slower data center development tempers some optimism. Dividend yield hovers at 3%, with market cap near $23.5 billion.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc., a leading North American utility holding company based in Canada, provides electric and gas services across Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean to over 3 million customers. It emphasizes regulated assets with a focus on transmission and distribution. FTS shares trade around $57, near the upper end of a 52-week range of $46-$59, reflecting year-to-date gains of roughly 11%. Recent analyst upgrades, including price target hikes to C$81 equivalent, bolster sentiment ahead of Q1 earnings. Steady performance stems from diversified operations and consistent dividend growth, yielding about 3.2%. With a market cap exceeding $29 billion, Fortis exhibits resilience in recent market activity, supported by long-term infrastructure investments.
LNT Overview and Recent Performance
Alliant Energy Corporation serves electric and gas customers in Iowa and Wisconsin through its IPL and WPL segments, focusing on generation, distribution, and retail sales. LNT operates a mix of coal, gas, wind, and nuclear assets. Shares have climbed to about $74, topping a 52-week range of $59-$76, with year-to-date returns leading peers at nearly 16%. Q1 ongoing EPS of $0.82 met expectations, fueled by customer growth and retail sales, prompting optimistic guidance. Momentum in recent weeks reflects sector tailwinds like electrification, though mild weather impacted results. Dividend yield is around 2.8%, with market cap at $19 billion, positioning it as a growth-oriented utility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—showcasing annualized returns of 50-100%+, win rates of 50-70%, and profit factors above 1.5—earn a spot among the 25 featured. These bots employ AI/ML for real-time signals, technical/fundamental analysis, take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), and themes like semiconductors, data centers, and industrials. Virtual and brokerage agents offer risk management for copy trading. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your strategy in today’s market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CMS, FTS, and LNT share regulated utility models emphasizing stable cash flows from electric and gas distribution, but differ in scale and exposure. Fortis stands out with the largest market cap ($29B) and broadest geographic diversification across North America and Caribbean, reducing regional risks compared to CMS’s Michigan focus and LNT’s Midwest operations. Growth drivers include rising demand from data centers and EVs; CMS and LNT highlight industrial loads, while FTS benefits from transmission investments. Recent momentum favors LNT (16% YTD), over FTS (11%) and CMS (10%), amid earnings beats or meets. Dividend yields are competitive (FTS 3.2%, CMS 3%, LNT 2.8%), supporting income appeal. P/E ratios (21-23) suggest fair valuations, though higher debt/equity (around 160-190%) exposes all to interest rate risks. Sector sentiment is positive on power needs, but regulatory hurdles and capex intensity pose trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor LNT in the current environment, given its superior year-to-date momentum, consistent earnings delivery, and positioning for customer growth amid electrification trends. While FTS offers diversification and CMS shows earnings strength, LNT’s relative outperformance and stability edge it ahead probabilistically for trend-following strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and LNT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and LNT’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.03% , and LNT (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
LNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.80% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | FTS | LNT | |
| Capitalization | 22.6B | 28.4B | 18.9B |
| EBITDA | 3.4B | 5.91B | 2.03B |
| Gain YTD | 6.438 | 7.528 | 14.051 |
| P/E Ratio | 20.28 | 22.67 | 22.96 |
| Revenue | 8.82B | 12.2B | 4.42B |
| Total Cash | 175M | 359M | 115M |
| Total Debt | 19.1B | 35.4B | 11.8B |
CMS | FTS | LNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 60 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 63 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 78 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 56 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 35 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTS's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CMS (65) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as LNT (67) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and similarly to LNT’s over the last 12 months.
LNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (50) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as FTS (63) in the null industry. This means that LNT's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as LNT (65) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to LNT’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
LNT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (56) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CMS (59) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that LNT's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LNT (43) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as CMS (56) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to LNT’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | FTS | LNT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 49% | 8 days ago 39% | 8 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 39% | 16 days ago 34% | 13 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | N/A | 2 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
CMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
FTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then ED could also see price increases.
LNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNT has been closely correlated with AEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNT jumps, then AEP could also see price increases.