CNQ
Price
$47.98
Change
+$0.41 (+0.86%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
100.56B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGY
Price
$29.56
Change
+$0.75 (+2.60%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.47B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VET
Price
$12.80
Change
+$0.22 (+1.75%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.97B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNQ or MGY or VET

Header iconCNQ vs MGY vs VET Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs MGY vs VETBanner chart's image
CNQ vs MGY vs VET Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) vs. Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) vs. Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • VET has delivered the strongest year-to-date (YTD) performance at 59.22%, outpacing CNQ's 39.12% and MGY's 38.30% amid recent oil price surges.
  • CNQ leads in scale with a $97.6 billion market capitalization and the lowest trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio at 12.40, signaling attractive valuation.
  • All three offer dividends above 2%, with CNQ at 3.83%, supporting income-focused investors in the energy sector.
  • Recent geopolitical tensions have driven West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude above $100 per barrel, boosting sentiment across CNQ, MGY, and VET.
  • Upcoming Q1 earnings reports for all three could catalyze further moves, with analysts noting positive production updates for VET.
  • VET shows the lowest beta at 0.53, indicating relative stability despite international exposure.

Introduction

In the volatile energy sector, CNQ, MGY, and VET stand out as key oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) players. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid rising crude prices driven by geopolitical risks. Traders seeking momentum in U.S. shale or diversified international assets, and investors eyeing dividends and valuations, will find insights into relative strengths and trade-offs in today's oil-fueled rally.

CNQ Overview and Recent Performance

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is a major integrated oil and gas producer focused on crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids primarily in Western Canada, with assets in the North Sea and Offshore Africa. In recent market activity, CNQ has benefited from WTI crude surpassing $100 per barrel, posting strong YTD gains of 39.12% and trading near its 52-week high of $51.34. Sentiment has improved with analyst price target increases, such as Goldman Sachs raising to $49, and mentions in TSX dividend stock lists. Upcoming earnings on May 7 are anticipated amid expectations of stable production and robust profitability, with a trailing P/E of 12.40 and return on equity (ROE) of 25.81% underscoring financial strength.

MGY Overview and Recent Performance

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) operates as an independent E&P company targeting oil, natural gas, and liquids in South Texas' Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk. Recent weeks have seen MGY gain from elevated oil prices, delivering YTD returns of 38.30% toward its 52-week high of $32.76. Positive momentum stems from quarterly dividend announcements and Zacks highlighting it as a top momentum stock. Analysts like Truist and Argus maintain Buy or Hold ratings with targets around $32-$34 ahead of May 6 earnings, supported by a P/E of 17.39, ROE of 17.01%, and low debt-to-equity of 20.99%.

VET Overview and Recent Performance

Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) pursues international E&P with properties across North America, Europe, and Australia, emphasizing optimization of mature assets. VET has outperformed peers YTD at 59.22%, approaching its 52-week high of $14.82, fueled by Q1 production exceeding guidance, a Germany asset acquisition, and Croatia divestment. European gas price surges and crude rallies have lifted sentiment, despite trailing twelve-month (TTM) losses. With a forward P/E of 13.18, dividend yield of 2.94%, and beta of 0.53, VET appeals for growth potential ahead of May 6 earnings.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML pattern recognition, trend following, and fundamental analysis, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Featured bots show impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 40% to over 160%, win rates of 50-75%, and profit factors above 1.5 in themes like volatility, energy, and semiconductors—some targeting oil-related tickers. Virtual and brokerage agents offer risk-managed copy trading suited to current conditions. Traders can explore these high performers to align with market trends; visit the Trending AI Robots page for details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CNQ, MGY, and VET share E&P exposure to oil price swings but differ in scale and geography: CNQ's vast Canadian operations provide cost efficiencies and midstream assets, while MGY focuses on high-margin U.S. shale for quicker response to WTI moves, and VET diversifies across Europe for gas upside.

Growth drivers hinge on Brent and WTI above $100, with VET showing strongest recent momentum but TTM losses versus CNQ's profitability. Risk factors include VET's higher debt-to-equity (58.60%) and geopolitical exposure, compared to MGY's conservative balance sheet. Valuation favors CNQ's low P/E and high ROE; market sentiment is bullish across the board with analyst upgrades and earnings anticipation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI analysis, factoring trend consistency, stability, and catalysts, currently leans toward CNQ. Its superior profitability, largest scale, attractive valuation, and balanced beta position it favorably for prolonged oil strength, though VET's momentum warrants monitoring post-earnings.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CNQ: $47.98MGY: $29.56VET: $12.80)
Brand notoriety: MGY and VET are not notable and CNQ is notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 55%, MGY: 86%, VET: 40%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $100.56B, MGY: $5.47B, VET: $1.97B
$CNQ is valued at $100.56B, while MGY has a market capitalization of $5.47B, and VET's market capitalization is $1.97B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Production ranges from $149.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Production industry is $5.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and VET’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGY is a better buy in the long-term than CNQ, which in turn is a better option than VET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and VET’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the short-term than VET, which in turn is a better option than MGY.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +7.75% price change this week, while MGY (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +6.96% , and VET (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated +8.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

MGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

VET is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.88% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($101B) has a higher market cap than MGY($5.47B) and VET($1.97B). VET has higher P/E ratio than MGY and CNQ: VET (25.11) vs MGY (17.09) and CNQ (11.80). VET YTD gains are higher at: 53.477 vs. CNQ (41.743) and MGY (36.660). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5B vs. MGY (875M) and VET (-453.68M). CNQ has more cash in the bank: 113M vs. MGY (96.7M) and VET (16.4M). MGY has less debt than VET and CNQ: MGY (411M) vs VET (1.3B) and CNQ (17.3B). CNQ has higher revenues than VET and MGY: CNQ (44.5B) vs VET (1.92B) and MGY (1.32B).
CNQMGYVET
Capitalization101B5.47B1.97B
EBITDA17.5B875M-453.68M
Gain YTD41.74336.66053.477
P/E Ratio11.8017.0925.11
Revenue44.5B1.32B1.92B
Total Cash113M96.7M16.4M
Total Debt17.3B411M1.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ vs MGY vs VET: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
MGY
VET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
137216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
232581
SMR RATING
1..100
525497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
424641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48178
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VET's Valuation (31) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (76). This means that VET's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (25) and is somewhat better than the same rating for VET (81). This means that CNQ's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and somewhat faster than VET’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's SMR Rating (52) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (54) and is somewhat better than the same rating for VET (97). This means that CNQ's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and somewhat faster than VET’s over the last 12 months.

VET's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (42) and is in the same range as MGY (46). This means that VET's stock grew similarly to CNQ’s and similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.

VET's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (17) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (48). This means that VET's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQMGYVET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSLBX169.87N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
SEECX42.24N/A
N/A
Steward Values Enhanced Lg Cap I
FBMPX145.98N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Communication Services
MVCAX31.59-0.46
-1.44%
MFS Mid Cap Value A
PSPFX5.31-0.21
-3.80%
US Global Investors Global Res

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with EOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then EOG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
+0.86%
EOG - CNQ
75%
Closely correlated
+3.14%
CHRD - CNQ
74%
Closely correlated
+4.10%
VET - CNQ
74%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
APA - CNQ
73%
Closely correlated
+5.04%
MGY - CNQ
73%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
More

MGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGY has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGY jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGY
1D Price
Change %
MGY100%
+2.60%
CHRD - MGY
86%
Closely correlated
+4.10%
OVV - MGY
85%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
MTDR - MGY
84%
Closely correlated
+4.14%
DVN - MGY
83%
Closely correlated
+4.76%
PR - MGY
83%
Closely correlated
+3.17%
More

VET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VET has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VET jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VET
1D Price
Change %
VET100%
+1.75%
ZPTAF - VET
77%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
CNQ - VET
74%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
MGY - VET
73%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
OVV - VET
73%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
CRLFF - VET
72%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
More