COHR
Price
$307.50
Change
+$23.33 (+8.21%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
57.65B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSLR
Price
$203.47
Change
+$6.22 (+3.15%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
21.86B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$110.44
Change
+$4.86 (+4.60%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
11.95B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COHR or FSLR or RMBS

Header iconCOHR vs FSLR vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts COHR vs FSLR vs RMBSBanner chart's image
COHR vs FSLR vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coherent Corp (COHR) vs. First Solar (FSLR) vs. Rambus (RMBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • COHR has delivered exceptional 1-year returns of over 260%, driven by AI optics demand and partnerships like NVIDIA, far outpacing peers.
  • FSLR reports strong 2025 sales of $5.2B but faces pressure from Q4 earnings miss and soft 2026 guidance, leading to recent downgrades and share weakness.
  • RMBS achieved record Q4 2025 revenue of $190M with AI memory innovations like HBM4E, though shares declined 12% in the past month amid valuation concerns.
  • All three stocks operate in tech sectors tied to AI and data centers, but COHR shows superior momentum with YTD gains near 28% versus RMBS's 4%.
  • Relative performance highlights COHR's leadership in recent market activity, boosted by S&P 500 inclusion and datacenter growth.
  • Investor focus on AI catalysts favors optics and memory plays, with solar-exposed FSLR lagging amid policy uncertainties.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines COHR, FSLR, and RMBS, three technology firms with exposure to high-growth areas like AI infrastructure, datacenters, and semiconductors. COHR specializes in optics, FSLR in solar modules, and RMBS in memory IP. Traders seeking momentum in AI-driven sectors and investors evaluating relative performance in recent market activity will find value here. Amid shifting sentiment toward AI enablers versus renewables, these stocks offer insights into sector trade-offs and positioning.

COHR Overview and Recent Performance

Coherent Corp (COHR) develops and markets optoelectronic components, lasers, and engineered materials for datacenters, communications, and industrial uses. In recent market activity, shares have surged with 1-year returns exceeding 260% and YTD gains around 28%, reflecting strong demand for AI optics. Key drivers include a multi-year NVIDIA supply alliance for AI optics and upcoming S&P 500 inclusion alongside peers. Q2 FY26 results showed 18% revenue growth to $1.69B and EPS of $1.29, beating estimates, with datacenter bookings over 4x book-to-bill. Sentiment remains positive despite volatility, supported by 70%+ revenue from datacom and premium valuations justified by AI infrastructure spending.

FSLR Overview and Recent Performance

First Solar (FSLR) manufactures thin-film photovoltaic solar modules, serving utilities and commercial projects globally. Recent weeks have seen share pressure, with YTD returns near 28% but 1-year gains at 44% trailing peers, exacerbated by a post-earnings drop after Q4 2025 results. Despite beating revenue estimates at $1.68B and full-year sales of $5.2B, EPS of $4.84 missed forecasts, and 2026 guidance for $4.9B-$5.2B sales disappointed amid softer pricing and margin recovery delays. Analyst downgrades followed, citing policy risks and competition, shifting sentiment negative in recent market activity despite U.S. manufacturing expansion.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) provides semiconductor IP and chips for memory interfaces and security in AI data centers. Shares have pulled back 12% in recent weeks despite strong Q4 2025 results, with record revenue of $190M, product sales up 41% yearly, and EPS of $0.58 beating views. YTD returns stand at 4%, with 1-year gains of 68%, reflecting AI memory momentum via HBM4E controller IP advancements. Executive changes and valuation scrutiny amid high P/E have tempered enthusiasm, though cash generation hit records at $360M annually. Sentiment balances growth potential against recent pullbacks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like technical and fundamental analysis, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, targeting sectors including semiconductors, AI infrastructure, energy, and volatility plays. Trending examples boast annualized returns up to +218%, win rates reaching 95%, and profit factors over 25, such as bots on SOXL semiconductors or multi-ticker AI/tech portfolios. Only those excelling in current volatility and market conditions earn a spot, offering varied styles from hedging to momentum trading. Explore these for data-driven insights into dynamic portfolios.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COHR, FSLR, and RMBS diverge in business models: COHR's hardware optics versus RMBS's IP licensing and FSLR's solar manufacturing. Growth drivers favor AI for COHR and RMBS (datacom 70%+ revenue), while FSLR relies on renewables policy. Recent momentum crowns COHR with 260%+ 1-year returns versus RMBS's 68% and FSLR's 44%. Risks include FSLR's trade exposure, COHR's high beta (1.91), and RMBS's leadership transitions. Valuation sensitivity shows FSLR cheapest (P/E 13x), RMBS mid-range (42x), and COHR premium (233x TTM). Market sentiment tilts to AI plays amid datacenter expansion.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors COHR due to superior trend consistency, explosive momentum from AI optics catalysts like NVIDIA ties, and relative strength in datacenter positioning. While RMBS offers solid AI memory growth and FSLR stable solar cash flows, COHR's bookings visibility and sector tailwinds suggest higher probability of outperformance in coming quarters, barring broader pullbacks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (COHR: $307.50FSLR: $203.47RMBS: $110.44)
Brand notoriety: COHR and RMBS are not notable and FSLR is notable
COHR represents the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry, FSLR is part of the Alternative Power Generation industry, and RMBS is in the Semiconductors industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COHR: 134%, FSLR: 111%, RMBS: 120%
Market capitalization -- COHR: $57.65B, FSLR: $21.86B, RMBS: $11.95B
COHR [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $57.65B. FSLR’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $21.86B. RMBS [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $11.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $95.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.58T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $7.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $2.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $113.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COHR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and RMBS’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COHR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than COHR, which in turn is a better option than FSLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COHR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSLR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and RMBS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COHR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSLR is a better buy in the short-term than COHR and RMBS.

Price Growth

COHR (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +19.11% price change this week, while FSLR (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was +4.17% , and RMBS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +18.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.08%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.14%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

COHR is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2026.

FSLR is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+1.17% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

@Alternative Power Generation (+0.41% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

@Semiconductors (+6.73% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COHR($57.7B) has a higher market cap than FSLR($21.9B) and RMBS($11.9B). COHR has higher P/E ratio than RMBS and FSLR: COHR (301.47) vs RMBS (52.34) and FSLR (14.32). COHR YTD gains are higher at: 66.603 vs. RMBS (20.187) and FSLR (-22.111). FSLR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.15B vs. COHR (1.08B) and RMBS (325M). FSLR has more cash in the bank: 2.86B vs. COHR (864M) and RMBS (762M). RMBS has less debt than FSLR and COHR: RMBS (25M) vs FSLR (655M) and COHR (3.55B). COHR has higher revenues than FSLR and RMBS: COHR (6.29B) vs FSLR (5.22B) and RMBS (708M).
COHRFSLRRMBS
Capitalization57.7B21.9B11.9B
EBITDA1.08B2.15B325M
Gain YTD66.603-22.11120.187
P/E Ratio301.4714.3252.34
Revenue6.29B5.22B708M
Total Cash864M2.86B762M
Total Debt3.55B655M25M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COHR vs FSLR vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
COHR
FSLR
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
171717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
126125
SMR RATING
1..100
864946
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
355740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
202714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBS's Valuation (79) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as COHR (91) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry, and is in the same range as FSLR (91) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to COHR’s and similarly to FSLR’s over the last 12 months.

COHR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as RMBS (25) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FSLR (61) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that COHR's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and somewhat faster than FSLR’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FSLR (49) in the Electronic Components industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for COHR (86) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to FSLR’s and somewhat faster than COHR’s over the last 12 months.

COHR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as RMBS (40) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as FSLR (57) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that COHR's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and similarly to FSLR’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as COHR (20) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry, and is in the same range as FSLR (27) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to COHR’s and similarly to FSLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COHRFSLRRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COHR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLNK8.140.14
+1.75%
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF
YMAR28.090.05
+0.18%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bffr ETF Mar
PFFL7.97-0.01
-0.10%
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN
CLOZ25.78-0.04
-0.15%
Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF
PRF49.18-0.27
-0.55%
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF

COHR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COHR has been closely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COHR jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COHR
1D Price
Change %
COHR100%
+8.21%
MKSI - COHR
74%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
KEYS - COHR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
ST - COHR
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
ESE - COHR
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
VPG - COHR
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More

FSLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLR has been loosely correlated with ENPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLR jumps, then ENPH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSLR
1D Price
Change %
FSLR100%
+3.15%
ENPH - FSLR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
BE - FSLR
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.10%
RUN - FSLR
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
NXT - FSLR
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.86%
FCEL - FSLR
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+4.60%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More