COST
Price
$994.80
Change
-$3.04 (-0.30%)
Updated
Apr 21, 10:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
442.69B
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MO
Price
$64.39
Change
-$0.22 (-0.34%)
Updated
Apr 21, 10:34 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
107.98B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SYY
Price
$76.26
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
36.47B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST or MO or SYY

Header iconCOST vs MO vs SYY Comparison
Open Charts COST vs MO vs SYYBanner chart's image
COST vs MO vs SYY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Costco Wholesale (COST) vs. Altria Group (MO) vs. Sysco Corporation (SYY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • COST shares have shown resilience with YTD gains around 15-16%, bolstered by strong quarterly revenue growth of 9.2% and membership expansions in recent market activity.
  • MO offers a compelling dividend yield near 6%, with YTD returns of about 15% and growth in oral nicotine products offsetting declines in traditional cigarette volumes.
  • SYY has delivered solid YTD performance of roughly 16%, driven by volume gains and positive sales trends in foodservice distribution amid sector recovery.
  • All three stocks exhibit relative stability in consumer staples and defensive sectors, with COST leading in growth momentum, MO in yield, and SYY in operational efficiency.
  • Recent weeks highlight tariff-related opportunities for COST, regulatory navigation for MO, and volume-driven upside for SYY.
  • Comparative valuations position MO attractively on P/E relative to peers, while COST trades at a premium due to consistent execution.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines COST, MO, and SYY, three stalwarts in consumer defensive sectors—retail warehousing, tobacco, and food distribution. These stocks appeal to investors seeking stability amid market volatility, offering exposure to essential goods with recurring demand. Traders may value their relative performance in recent weeks, where defensive positioning has provided buffers against broader swings. This analysis highlights key metrics, recent developments, and contrasts to inform stock comparison decisions in the current environment.

COST Overview and Recent Performance

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) operates a global chain of membership warehouses, offering bulk goods from groceries to electronics. Its membership model drives loyalty and high renewal rates, supporting steady revenue. In recent market activity, COST reported Q1 CY2026 revenue of $69.6 billion, up 9.2% year-over-year and beating estimates, fueled by comparable sales growth and new warehouse openings. Shares have gained about 15-16% YTD, reflecting resilience despite minor pullbacks, with analysts citing potential tariff refunds as a catalyst for price cuts and enhanced member value. Sentiment remains positive, underpinned by digital investments and operational efficiencies, though competition in retail weighs on margins.

MO Overview and Recent Performance

Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is a leading U.S. tobacco company, producing cigarettes like Marlboro, smokeless products, and oral nicotine pouches via subsidiaries such as Philip Morris USA and Helix Innovations. It navigates declining cigarette volumes through diversification into smoke-free alternatives. Recent performance shows YTD returns near 15%, with shares around $66 amid a 6% dividend yield attracting income investors. Growth in oral nicotine, where on! pouches gained market share despite discounting, has offset combustibles weakness. Analyst views mix caution on volumes with optimism for reduced-risk products, supporting relative stability in recent weeks.

SYY Overview and Recent Performance

Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the world's largest foodservice distributor, supplying restaurants, healthcare, and institutions with food products, equipment, and supplies across U.S., Canada, and Europe. Its scale enables efficient distribution amid food-away-from-home demand. Shares have advanced about 16% YTD, trading near $85, with recent positive sales performance lifting sentiment through improved volumes. Operational enhancements, including AI initiatives and volume gains, have driven outperformance versus peers in recent market conditions. While sensitive to hospitality cycles, steady demand from essentials bolsters positioning.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only those demonstrating superior adaptability—such as high win rates (up to 94%), profit factors (over 4.0), and annualized returns ranging from 30% to 215%—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Bots employ AI/ML for trend following, swing trading, hedging, and multi-sector rotations (e.g., aerospace, energy, semiconductors), with timeframes like 5-60 minutes and risk-managed virtual agents minimizing drawdowns. Stats highlight real-world edge: one aerospace bot logs 82% win rate and 124% returns; energy strategies exceed 130% annualized. Explore these for current market suitability and consider subscribing to top signals for automated insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COST, MO, and SYY span consumer defensive realms but diverge in models: COST's high-volume membership retail contrasts MO's branded tobacco focus and SYY's B2B distribution scale. Growth drivers include COST's international expansion (9%+ sales growth), MO's nicotine pouch shift (10%+ volume rise), and SYY's volume recovery. Recent momentum favors SYY (16% YTD), edging COST and MO (15%). Risks: retail competition for COST, regulation for MO, cyclicality for SYY. Valuations show MO cheapest (P/E ~16x), COST premium; sentiment tilts toward stability across all.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI leans toward COST in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency from revenue beats and membership catalysts, alongside defensive positioning with lower relative volatility. Its outperformance in growth metrics versus MO's yield focus and SYY's volumes suggests higher probability of near-term upside, though all warrant monitoring for sector rotations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (COST: $997.84MO: $64.61SYY: $76.26)
Brand notoriety: COST and MO are notable and SYY is not notable
COST represents the Discount Stores industry, MO is part of the Tobacco industry, and SYY is in the Food Distributors industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 116%, MO: 72%, SYY: 71%
Market capitalization -- COST: $442.69B, MO: $107.98B, SYY: $36.47B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $442.69B. MO’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $107.98B. SYY [@Food Distributors] has a market capitalization of $36.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $1.02T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $245.55B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $36.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $117.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $32.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMO’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and SYY’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MO’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MO is a better buy in the long-term than COST, which in turn is a better option than SYY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SYY’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SYY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than MO, which in turn is a better option than SYY.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.73% price change this week, while MO (@Tobacco) price change was -3.29% , and SYY (@Food Distributors) price fluctuated +3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

MO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

SYY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (+3.19% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

@Tobacco (+0.37% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

@Food Distributors (-1.49% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COST($443B) has a higher market cap than MO($108B) and SYY($36.5B). COST has higher P/E ratio than SYY and MO: COST (51.89) vs SYY (20.56) and MO (15.68). COST YTD gains are higher at: 15.871 vs. MO (13.931) and SYY (5.037). COST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.1B vs. MO (10.8B) and SYY (4.1B). COST has less debt than SYY and MO: COST (8.17B) vs SYY (15B) and MO (25.7B). COST has higher revenues than SYY and MO: COST (286B) vs SYY (82.6B) and MO (20.1B).
COSTMOSYY
Capitalization443B108B36.5B
EBITDA14.1B10.8B4.1B
Gain YTD15.87113.9315.037
P/E Ratio51.8915.6820.56
Revenue286B20.1B82.6B
Total Cash18.2BN/A169M
Total Debt8.17B25.7B15B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs MO vs SYY: Fundamental Ratings
COST
MO
SYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
175615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
111375
SMR RATING
1..100
32914
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
353460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
711651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MO's Valuation (8) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYY (50) in the Food Distributors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for COST (94) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MO's stock grew somewhat faster than SYY’s and significantly faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MO (13) in the Tobacco industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SYY (75) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that COST's stock grew similarly to MO’s and somewhat faster than SYY’s over the last 12 months.

MO's SMR Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as SYY (14) in the Food Distributors industry, and is in the same range as COST (32) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to SYY’s and similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as COST (35) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as SYY (60) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to COST’s and similarly to SYY’s over the last 12 months.

MO's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYY (51) in the Food Distributors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for COST (71) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MO's stock grew somewhat faster than SYY’s and somewhat faster than COST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTMOSYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZSB23.25N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd
CGCB26.49-0.01
-0.02%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
SEPP31.50-0.05
-0.16%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Sep
EZBC44.14-0.68
-1.52%
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
DGP191.67-4.82
-2.45%
DB Gold Double Long ETN

SYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYY has been loosely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYY jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYY
1D Price
Change %
SYY100%
-0.01%
USFD - SYY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
PFGC - SYY
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
UNFI - SYY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
ANDE - SYY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
CHEF - SYY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More