Advertisement
CRM or HUBS or TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Salesforce (CRM) demonstrates relative stability in recent market activity, with a trailing P/E ratio of 23.9 and YTD gains around 30%, appealing to value-oriented investors.
- HubSpot (HUBS) trades at a premium trailing P/E over 278 amid YTD declines of about 40%, reflecting growth pressures in the SaaS space.
- Atlassian (TEAM) surged over 29% in a recent session following a Q1 earnings beat, though YTD performance remains mixed with high volatility.
- All three stocks operate in cloud software, but CRM benefits from enterprise scale, while HUBS and TEAM target mid-market and collaboration niches.
- Analyst targets suggest upside: CRM at $270, HUBS at $345, TEAM at $142.
Introduction
Salesforce (CRM), HubSpot (HUBS), and Atlassian (TEAM) represent key players in the cloud software sector, focusing on customer relationship management (CRM), marketing automation, and collaboration tools, respectively. This comparison analyzes their recent performance, valuations, and market positioning amid evolving AI integrations and macroeconomic shifts. Traders seeking short-term momentum and long-term investors eyeing SaaS growth will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and sentiment drivers in the current environment.
CRM Overview and Recent Performance
Salesforce (CRM) is a global leader in cloud-based CRM platforms, powering sales, service, and marketing for enterprises with AI-enhanced tools like Einstein. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $186, reflecting a mix of weekly gains near 5% offset by monthly dips of about 2%, amid broader SaaS volatility. Sentiment has been influenced by AI strategy advancements, including partnerships and restructuring for efficiency, alongside stable revenue growth projections. Analysts note potential undervaluation despite YTD gains, with a forward P/E of 14 signaling profitability focus.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot (HUBS) provides an integrated platform for inbound marketing, sales, and customer service, targeting small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs). Shares hover near $240, down sharply YTD by roughly 40% from 52-week highs over $680, with recent weekly rises of 10% unable to fully counter monthly declines around 2%. Performance reflects sector pressures and AI competition, though AI initiatives and earnings anticipation have spurred volatility. High trailing P/E above 278 underscores growth expectations, with forward multiples at 19 indicating margin potential if execution improves.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
Atlassian (TEAM) offers collaboration and productivity tools like Jira and Confluence for software development and team workflows. Trading around $95, shares jumped over 29% in a single recent session post-Q1 CY2026 earnings beat, boosting SaaS peers, though YTD remains challenged from 52-week highs near $232. Momentum stems from revenue growth and billings strength, with forward P/E at 16 amid current losses. Analyst optimism persists on customer metrics, but volatility persists in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots excel in current market conditions, featuring win rates from 51% to 88%, annualized returns up to +162%, and profit factors ranging 1.5 to 11.7, with timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute signals. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents on NVDA and AMAT yielding +69% to +97% annualized, and sector themes like space or industrials. Each employs unique styles—trend trading, double agents—with built-in risk management like stop-loss corridors. Traders can copy these for automated execution. Explore the page to identify bots matching your risk profile and timeframe.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Salesforce (CRM) emphasizes enterprise-scale CRM with recurring revenue stability, contrasting HubSpot’s (HUBS) SMB marketing focus prone to economic sensitivity. Atlassian (TEAM) differentiates via devops tools, less tied to sales cycles. Growth drivers include AI for all, but CRM’s scale yields steadier momentum versus HUBS’ higher volatility and TEAM’s earnings-driven swings. Risks: HUBS elevated valuation (fwd P/E 19), TEAM profitability path, CRM macro exposure. Sector-wise, all SaaS-exposed, but CRM shows resilient sentiment; HUBS and TEAM trade at discounts to peaks, heightening rebound trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors Salesforce (CRM) due to its trend consistency, attractive forward valuation, and enterprise stability amid SaaS turbulence. While TEAM offers momentum from catalysts and HUBS growth upside, CRM’s relative positioning suggests higher probability of outperformance in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TEAM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TEAM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -17.74% , and TEAM (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +3.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.04% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | HUBS | TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 149B | 10.1B | 23.2B |
| EBITDA | 12.5B | 207M | -21.17M |
| Gain YTD | -31.194 | -50.825 | -43.506 |
| P/E Ratio | 23.31 | 103.86 | N/A |
| Revenue | 41.5B | 3.13B | 6.19B |
| Total Cash | 9.57B | 1.7B | 1.14B |
| Total Debt | 17.2B | 262M | 1.24B |
CRM | HUBS | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 4 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 87 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 63 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 96 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (23) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (80) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s and significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (87) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as TEAM (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRM (62) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TEAM's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (92) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TEAM's stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s and significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | HUBS | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YMAX | 8.72 | 0.18 | +2.11% |
| YieldMax Universe Fund Of Option Inc ETF | |||
| PXF | 76.31 | 1.32 | +1.76% |
| Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF | |||
| EETH | 28.49 | 0.26 | +0.92% |
| ProShares Ether ETF | |||
| ZMAY | 25.89 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Innovator Equity Dfnd Prt ETF -1 Yr May | |||
| CPSF | 26.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Feb | |||
CRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -2.43% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 78% Closely correlated | -19.03% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| ADBE - CRM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| DT - CRM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||