Advertisement
CSR or IRM or KIM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Centerspace (CSR) vs. Iron Mountain (IRM) vs. Kimco Realty (KIM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CSR reported Q1 2026 Core FFO of $1.12 per share, down year-over-year due to property sales and impairments, with same-store NOI declining 1.1%.
- IRM delivered robust Q1 2026 revenue growth of 21.6% to $1.94 billion and net income of $149 million, driving strong analyst upgrades and YTD gains of 60%.
- KIM beat Q1 2026 FFO estimates with $0.46 per share (up 4.5%), supported by solid leasing and raised full-year guidance, alongside a 4.42% dividend yield.
- IRM shows superior momentum with elevated PE at 143x but backed by data center catalysts, contrasting CSR's residential REIT pressures and KIM's stable retail focus.
- All three operate in real estate-related sectors, with IRM diversifying into high-growth digital storage amid recent market volatility.
Introduction
This comparison examines CSR (Centerspace), IRM (Iron Mountain), and KIM (Kimco Realty), three stocks spanning residential apartments, information management with data centers, and grocery-anchored retail centers. Investors seeking real estate exposure (REITs for CSR and KIM) or storage/data growth via IRM may find value in analyzing their relative performance, earnings momentum, and sector dynamics. Recent quarterly results highlight contrasts in growth drivers and market positioning amid interest rate sensitivity and economic shifts, aiding decisions on diversification or sector rotation.
CSR Overview and Recent Performance
Centerspace (CSR) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on owning and operating apartment communities across the U.S., emphasizing multifamily properties in mid-sized markets. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $68, reflecting modest YTD gains of about 3.7% but lagging broader indices. Q1 2026 results showed revenue of $65.1 million (down 3% year-over-year due to prior property dispositions) and Core FFO (funds from operations, a key REIT metric) of $1.12 per diluted share, missing estimates amid a $9.7 million impairment on a Denver property and 1.1% same-store NOI (net operating income) decline from higher expenses. Same-store occupancy held strong at 95.4%, supporting reaffirmed 2026 Core FFO guidance of $4.81-$5.05. Sentiment reflects caution on residential demand pressures, though liquidity remains solid at $267 million.
IRM Overview and Recent Performance
Iron Mountain (IRM) provides storage and information management services globally, with growing emphasis on data centers and digital solutions serving over 240,000 customers. The stock has surged, trading near $132 with exceptional YTD returns of 60% and 1-year gains of 40%, outperforming peers amid data storage demand. Q1 2026 earnings featured 21.6% revenue growth to $1.94 billion and net income of $149 million, beating expectations and prompting analyst upgrades like Truist's $140 target. Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO, a REIT-like metric) topped estimates, driven by asset lifecycle management (ALM) and data center expansion. Market sentiment benefits from diversification beyond physical storage, though high PE of 143x signals premium valuation tied to growth catalysts in AI infrastructure.
KIM Overview and Recent Performance
Kimco Realty (KIM) is a REIT owning high-quality, open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use assets primarily in the U.S. Shares hover around $24, with solid YTD performance of 17% and a reliable 4.42% dividend yield attracting income investors. Q1 2026 delivered FFO of $0.46 per diluted share (up 4.5% year-over-year, beating estimates), net income of $157 million, and 1.7% same-property NOI growth from higher minimum rents and leasing spreads of 23.8%. A record signed-not-occupied pipeline signals future revenue, leading to tightened full-year FFO guidance of $1.81-$1.84. Positive analyst views (Moderate Buy, $25 target) underscore resilient retail demand, though beta near 1.0 ties performance to broader real estate cycles.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, designed to trade thousands of tickers including stocks, ETFs, and crypto across diverse sectors like semiconductors, data centers, and energy. These bots employ varied strategies—such as momentum, sector rotation, and short-term swings—with impressive stats: annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7. For instance, leveraged ETF bots show profit-to-drawdown ratios over 17, while others achieve 70-80% win rates in volatile markets. Only the most suitable for current conditions earn trending status, helping traders adapt to real-time opportunities. Explore these tools to enhance your strategy across assets like CSR, IRM, and KIM.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CSR, IRM, and KIM differ in business models: CSR's residential multifamily faces occupancy and expense pressures, while KIM's retail benefits from grocery anchors and leasing momentum. IRM stands out with non-traditional REIT-like growth in data centers, fueling 21% revenue surge versus CSR's 3% decline. Recent momentum favors IRM (60% YTD) over KIM (17%) and CSR (4%), though IRM's beta (1.23) implies higher volatility than KIM (1.0) or CSR (0.83). Valuation sensitivity shows IRM's lofty 143x PE contrasting KIM's 27x and CSR's stability; risk factors include rate exposure for REITs and execution for IRM's expansion. Market sentiment tilts toward IRM's catalysts amid AI/data trends, balancing KIM's income appeal.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IRM based on superior trend consistency from Q1 beats, data center catalysts, and relative YTD outperformance, positioning it ahead in growth-oriented portfolios. KIM offers stability with dividend reliability, while CSR lags on earnings misses. Probability leans toward IRM's continued momentum if sector tailwinds persist.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIRM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and KIM’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IRM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and KIM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CSR (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while IRM (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -4.62% , and KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price fluctuated 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.21%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
IRM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
KIM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+0.95% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.35% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.13% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| CSR | IRM | KIM | |
| Capitalization | 1.12B | 36.8B | 15.7B |
| EBITDA | 171M | 2.32B | 1.48B |
| Gain YTD | 1.305 | 50.123 | 16.483 |
| P/E Ratio | 141.89 | 134.26 | 26.84 |
| Revenue | 272M | 7.25B | 2.16B |
| Total Cash | 7.56M | 251M | 168M |
| Total Debt | 1.02B | 19.4B | 8.31B |
CSR | IRM | KIM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 14 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 25 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 2 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 22 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 91 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 36 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KIM's Valuation (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRM (98) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CSR (100). This means that KIM's stock grew similarly to IRM’s and somewhat faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (65) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CSR (84). This means that IRM's stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s and somewhat faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's SMR Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for KIM (83) and is significantly better than the same rating for CSR (89). This means that IRM's stock grew significantly faster than KIM’s and significantly faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CSR (48) and is in the same range as KIM (50). This means that IRM's stock grew similarly to CSR’s and similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.
CSR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (54) and is significantly better than the same rating for IRM (91). This means that CSR's stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s and significantly faster than IRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CSR | IRM | KIM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 71% | 14 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% | 9 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFG | 28.92 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF | |||
| QNXT | 29.43 | -0.14 | -0.48% |
| iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | |||
| HTAX | 24.20 | -0.12 | -0.51% |
| Macquarie National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| SURE | 136.08 | -0.96 | -0.70% |
| AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF | |||
| IYG | 85.91 | -1.12 | -1.29% |
| iShares US Financial Services ETF | |||
CSR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSR has been loosely correlated with STAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSR jumps, then STAG could also see price increases.
IRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRM has been closely correlated with DLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRM jumps, then DLR could also see price increases.
KIM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.