Advertisement
CW or DRS or ESLT
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) vs Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) Earnings Recap: Defense Giants' Q4 2025 Showcases Robust Growth
Key Takeaways
- Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) led with Q4 2025 non-GAAP EPS of $3.56, beating estimates by 13.4%, and revenue of $2.15B, up 11% YoY.
- Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) reported Q4 adjusted EPS $3.79, up 16% YoY, with sales $947M, up 15%.
- Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) delivered Q4 adjusted EPS $0.42, beating by 13.5%, revenue $1.06B, up 8% YoY.
- All three beat EPS estimates, driven by defense demand; ESLT shows strongest revenue scale.
- Full-year backlogs signal sustained growth amid geopolitical tensions.
Earnings Context and Competitive Landscape
In the aerospace and defense sector, earnings reports highlight resilience amid rising global security needs. CW, DRS, and ESLT compete in overlapping areas like electronics, sensors, and mission systems for military applications. CW excels in naval/power systems, DRS in electro-optics/propulsion, and ESLT in integrated defense platforms. Q4 2025 recaps reveal double-digit growth, fueled by U.S. and allied budgets, positioning them for multi-year contracts.
Elbit Systems Ltd. Focus
Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) reported Q4 and full-year 2025 results on March 17, 2026. Non-GAAP diluted EPS reached $3.56, surpassing estimates of $3.14, while GAAP EPS was $3.52. Revenue hit $2.15B, up 11% YoY from $1.93B, topping $2.09B forecasts. Full-year revenue grew 16% to $7.94B, with non-GAAP EPS $12.75. Backlog expanded 24% to $28.1B, driven by international deals. Margins improved on higher volumes and efficiency, underscoring strong execution in land, air, and C4I systems.
Leonardo DRS, Inc. Context
Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) released Q4 2025 results on February 24, 2026. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.42, beating $0.37 consensus, with GAAP EPS $0.38. Revenue totaled $1.06B, up 8% YoY, exceeding expectations. Full-year revenue rose 13% to $3.65B, adjusted EBITDA $453M. Growth stemmed from advanced sensing, computing, and mission systems. Next earnings anticipated around April 30, 2026, with EPS est. $0.21. Robust bookings support ongoing expansion.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation Context
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) announced Q4 2025 on February 11, 2026. Adjusted diluted EPS $3.79, up 16% YoY, beating estimates; GAAP EPS $3.69. Sales $947M, up 15% (11% organic). Full-year sales record $3.5B, up 12%, adjusted EPS $13.23. Strength in A&D (NATO-aligned) and commercial nuclear. 2026 guidance: sales growth 6-8%, EPS double-digit rise. Next earnings ~May 6, 2026.
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
ESLT dominates revenue scale ($2.15B Q4) and EPS growth (34% YoY non-GAAP), with massive backlog visibility. CW shines in margins (19.7%) and cash flow ($315M Q4 FCF), low risk via diversification. DRS offers steady beats, electro-optic edge, but smaller scale. Growth signals strongest at ESLT (16% FY revenue); sentiment positive across, risks tied to defense spending/geopolitics. Valuations favor DRS on lower multiple.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the strongest AI trading bots from a pool of hundreds analyzing thousands of tickers. It ranks bots by recent performance across timeframes like short-term swings, long-term trends, and styles such as momentum or mean reversion. Metrics include win rate, profit factor, Sharpe ratio, and max drawdown, helping users identify top performers for stocks like CW, DRS, ESLT. Updated dynamically, it empowers data-driven trading without emotional bias, showcasing bots with proven edges in volatile sectors like defense.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron AI favors ESLT with 65% probability for near-term outperformance, due to record revenue, 24% backlog surge, and consistent EPS beats amid defense tailwinds. CW (25%) next on margin strength; DRS (10%) for value. Probabilistic edge from growth metrics and sentiment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and ESLT’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- DRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ESLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and ESLT’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- DRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ESLT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while DRS (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -6.73% , and ESLT (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated -5.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
CW is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
DRS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
ESLT is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+1.71% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| CW | DRS | ESLT | |
| Capitalization | 26.9B | 11.8B | 41.1B |
| EBITDA | 788M | 437M | 805M |
| Gain YTD | 32.469 | 30.021 | 52.833 |
| P/E Ratio | 56.72 | 42.95 | 77.43 |
| Revenue | 3.5B | 3.65B | 7.94B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 380M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 1.17B | 471M | 965M |
CW | ESLT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CW's Valuation (74) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ESLT (91). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to ESLT’s over the last 12 months.
CW's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ESLT (6). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to ESLT’s over the last 12 months.
CW's SMR Rating (45) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ESLT (55). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to ESLT’s over the last 12 months.
ESLT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CW (40). This means that ESLT’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as ESLT (28). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to ESLT’s over the last 12 months.
| CW | DRS | ESLT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 1 day ago 30% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | 8 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 51% | 6 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% | 5 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPME | 121.04 | 0.27 | +0.23% |
| JPMorgan Divers Ret US Mid Cp Eq ETF | |||
| AUGM | 34.56 | 0.06 | +0.16% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Aug | |||
| SPHD | 49.87 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| Invesco S&P 500® High Div Low Vol ETF | |||
| DMA | 7.96 | -0.07 | -0.84% |
| Destra Multi-Alternative Fund | |||
| TETH | 11.65 | -0.48 | -3.92% |
| 21Shares Ethereum ETF | |||
DRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRS has been loosely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DRS jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRS | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| KTOS - DRS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| MRCY - DRS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| KRMN - DRS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| LHX - DRS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CW - DRS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
ESLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESLT has been loosely correlated with DRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESLT jumps, then DRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESLT | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| DRS - ESLT | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| LHX - ESLT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| KTOS - ESLT | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| TATT - ESLT | 39% Loosely correlated | -7.93% | ||
| KRMN - ESLT | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||