This stock comparison examines DEO, a leading spirits producer; EL, a prestige beauty giant; and PEP, a diversified food and beverage powerhouse. These consumer defensive names offer insights into relative performance amid shifting market dynamics, including volume pressures, premium pricing resilience, and sector-specific catalysts. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors prioritizing stability or yield will find value in analyzing their business models, recent trajectories, and head-to-head metrics for informed positioning in the current environment.
Diageo plc (DEO), the global leader in premium alcoholic beverages with brands like Johnnie Walker, Guinness, and Smirnoff, operates across spirits, beer, and ready-to-drink categories. Recent market activity has pressured the stock, with shares cratering over 15% in a single week following a dividend cut and first-half 2026 earnings showing sales declines and a 2.8% organic sales drop year-over-year. Year-to-date returns stand at around -5%, with one-year performance down sharply by over 26%, underperforming the FTSE 100. Sentiment has shifted due to weak volumes, margin squeezes, and aggressive pricing strategies aimed at regaining share, though standout growth in brands like Don Julio provides pockets of resilience.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) dominates the prestige beauty sector with iconic brands in skincare, makeup, and fragrance, including Estée Lauder and Clinique. Recent performance reflects volatility, with shares down about 11% year-to-date amid broader market dips and an 8.5% post-dividend ex-date drop, though one-year gains exceed 30%, outpacing the S&P 500. Positive drivers include Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings beats, raised full-year guidance, and moves like full acquisition of Forest Essentials for Indian market expansion. Skincare and fragrance growth counter travel retail softness, fostering cautious optimism despite YTD headwinds.
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is a consumer staples behemoth with complementary portfolios in beverages like Pepsi and Gatorade, and snacks via Frito-Lay and Quaker. The stock has shown resilience, up over 12% year-to-date despite recent dips exceeding broader market losses and ongoing volume declines. Trading around $159, it offers a 3.4% dividend yield as a Dividend Aristocrat. Influences include product innovations targeting health trends, organizational changes for growth acceleration, and challenges from competition and softer demand, with one-year returns at about 8% amid analyst holds.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute, and styles including swing trading, hedging, and multi-agent portfolios. Only those excelling in current market conditions—based on volatility, momentum, and sector rotations—earn a spot, with stats like annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 52-95%, profit factors reaching 25+, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 22. Examples include bots yielding +80% annualized in aerospace or +134% across minerals and semis, often outperforming the S&P 500. These AI tools leverage technical and fundamental analyses for real-time signals. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk tolerance and market outlook.
DEO, EL, and PEP span beverages and personal care within consumer defensive, but diverge in models: DEO's premium alcohol focus exposes it to volume cyclicality and regulatory risks, contrasting PEP's stable, diversified snacks-beverages with recurring demand. EL bets on prestige beauty growth drivers like skincare amid aspirational trends. Recent momentum favors PEP (YTD +12%) over EL (-11%) and DEO (-5%), with PEP's P/E around 26 reflecting steady valuation versus DEO's pressure. Risks include DEO's sales declines, EL's regional softness, and PEP's competition; sentiment tilts toward PEP's yield and resilience.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor PEP for its trend consistency, dividend stability, and superior relative YTD positioning amid volatility. Observable factors like diversified exposure, positive year-to-date momentum, and lower drawdowns position it probabilistically ahead, though EL offers recovery potential from beauty catalysts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DEO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DEO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DEO (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while EL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +6.03% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.
DEO is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
EL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| DEO | EL | PEP | |
| Capitalization | 42.9B | 26.5B | 215B |
| EBITDA | 6.39B | 1.39B | 15.5B |
| Gain YTD | -8.972 | -29.794 | 10.714 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.14 | 147.80 | 26.25 |
| Revenue | 19.8B | 14.7B | 93.9B |
| Total Cash | 2.69B | 3.08B | 9.53B |
| Total Debt | 23.5B | 9.39B | 49.9B |
DEO | EL | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 59 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 90 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 64 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 34 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DEO's Valuation (13) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that DEO's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DEO (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP's stock grew somewhat faster than DEO’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for EL (90) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for DEO (97) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew significantly faster than EL’s and significantly faster than DEO’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EL (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as DEO (78) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to EL’s and similarly to DEO’s over the last 12 months.
EL's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PEP (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as DEO (50) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that EL's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to DEO’s over the last 12 months.
| DEO | EL | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 59% | 9 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 39% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEO has been closely correlated with PRNDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DEO jumps, then PRNDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEO | 100% | +1.87% | ||
| PRNDY - DEO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MGPI - DEO | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| BUD - DEO | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| STZ - DEO | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.53% | ||
| REMYY - DEO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||