This comparison examines DEO, EL, and PG, three prominent consumer staples stocks spanning beverages, prestige beauty, and household essentials. Investors seeking defensive positioning in volatile markets or traders eyeing relative performance in the sector will find value here. These firms offer exposure to essential goods with varying growth profiles and sensitivities to economic shifts, currency fluctuations, and consumer trends. Recent market activity underscores contrasts in resilience, making this stock comparison timely for portfolio allocation decisions.
Diageo plc (DEO) is a leading global producer of premium alcoholic beverages, with brands like Johnnie Walker, Guinness, and Smirnoff driving sales across North America, Europe, and emerging markets. In recent weeks, DEO shares have slumped to 52-week lows around $76, reflecting a dividend cut, lowered fiscal 2026 guidance, and softer demand in key regions like the U.S. and China. First-half revenue fell 4%, though net income edged up slightly. Sentiment has soured amid these developments, with YTD returns negative and a trailing P/E near 18, but forward P/E at 8.7 and a 5.4% yield attract value seekers. Broader pressures from input costs and consumer shifts in spirits have weighed on performance.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) specializes in prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance, and haircare, with iconic brands like Estée Lauder, Clinique, and La Mer sold worldwide. Recent market activity has seen EL volatility, dropping to around $84 amid a lawsuit against Jo Malone and post-Q2 earnings weakness despite beats on EPS and revenue. Sluggish Americas demand clouded turnaround efforts, leading to YTD declines of about 16%. Valuation remains stretched with a high P/E, though skincare and fragrance growth in China provides some offset. Investor sentiment reflects caution on regional disparities and broader beauty sector challenges.
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) dominates household and personal care with brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette, operating in beauty, grooming, health, fabric, and baby care segments globally. In recent weeks, PG has shown resilience around $150-153, despite modest dips steeper than the market amid recession fears. Q2 organic sales held flat, with core EPS stable; YTD performance edges positive relative to peers. A P/E around 23 and 2.8% yield underscore stability. Sentiment benefits from diversified essentials demand, though tariff risks and input costs pose headwinds.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 high-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical, fundamental, swing, or intraday—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, tailored to current volatility and sector rotations. Top performers boast annualized returns up to +216%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors of 1.6-25.8, such as bots targeting semiconductors (e.g., SOXL at +111%), volatility plays (e.g., USAR/SMR/CIFR at +216%), and multi-sector mixes (+132%). Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions earn a spot here, helping traders adapt dynamically. Explore Trending AI Robots to deploy proven AI edge today.
DEO, EL, and PG share consumer staples defensiveness but diverge in models: DEO's premium spirits face premiumization slowdowns and regional slumps; EL's prestige beauty contends with luxury spending cycles and China exposure; PG's mass-market essentials provide broadest stability. Growth drivers contrast—EL eyes skincare recovery, PG volume in emerging markets, DEO premium shifts. Recent momentum favors PG's steadiness over laggards. Risks include tariffs for all, but DEO/EL more sensitive to discretionary pulls. Valuations: DEO cheapest forward, PG balanced, EL premium. Sentiment tilts to PG for lower volatility.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PG for its superior trend consistency, lower relative drawdowns, and positioning as a staples anchor amid peers' catalysts like DEO's reset and EL's volatility. Probabilistic edge stems from stable sales, dividend reliability, and sector-relative strength, though monitoring tariff impacts remains key.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DEO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DEO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DEO (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while EL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +6.03% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +2.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
DEO is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
EL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| DEO | EL | PG | |
| Capitalization | 42.9B | 26.5B | 341B |
| EBITDA | 6.39B | 1.39B | 24.5B |
| Gain YTD | -8.972 | -29.794 | 3.064 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.14 | 147.80 | 21.73 |
| Revenue | 19.8B | 14.7B | 85.3B |
| Total Cash | 2.69B | 3.08B | 10.8B |
| Total Debt | 23.5B | 9.39B | 36.6B |
DEO | EL | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 59 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 90 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 64 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 34 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DEO's Valuation (13) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that DEO's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DEO (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew somewhat faster than DEO’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (90) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for DEO (97) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew somewhat faster than EL’s and significantly faster than DEO’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as EL (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as DEO (78) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to EL’s and similarly to DEO’s over the last 12 months.
EL's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as DEO (50) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (76) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that EL's stock grew similarly to DEO’s and somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
| DEO | EL | PG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 59% | 9 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 36% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| URNJ | 30.05 | 0.21 | +0.70% |
| Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | |||
| HWSM | 27.59 | N/A | N/A |
| Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd | |||
| INTF | 40.87 | -0.08 | -0.20% |
| iShares International Equity Factor ETF | |||
| BUZZ | 29.90 | -0.12 | -0.40% |
| VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | |||
| MZZ | 6.84 | -0.03 | -0.49% |
| ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEO has been closely correlated with PRNDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DEO jumps, then PRNDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEO | 100% | +1.87% | ||
| PRNDY - DEO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MGPI - DEO | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| BUD - DEO | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| STZ - DEO | 54% Loosely correlated | +8.53% | ||
| REMYY - DEO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||