Advertisement
DG or MDLZ or TGT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dollar General (DG) vs. Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. Target Corporation (TGT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- DG has delivered the strongest year-to-date performance at around +15%, driven by robust recovery momentum and raised analyst price targets up to $168.
- MDLZ offers stability in the consumer staples sector but faces headwinds from rising input costs like cocoa, with YTD gains of +8% and a 1-year decline of -10%.
- TGT shows improving trends post-Q4 earnings beat, with YTD +24% and new growth strategies including 30+ store openings in 2026, though consensus holds a Hold rating.
- Relative performance highlights DG's outperformance in discount retail amid value-seeking consumers, contrasting MDLZ's muted outlook and TGT's turnaround efforts.
- Analyst targets average $148 for DG, $67 for MDLZ, and $124 for TGT, signaling varied upside potential in current market conditions.
Introduction
This stock comparison evaluates DG, MDLZ, and TGT amid shifting consumer preferences toward value-oriented retail and staple goods. Dollar General thrives in discount variety, Mondelez International dominates global snacking, and Target Corporation blends general merchandise with digital innovation. Traders seeking momentum in consumer defensives and investors eyeing relative performance in retail and staples will find value in analyzing their recent price behavior, sector dynamics, and market positioning. With economic uncertainty influencing spending, these stocks offer insights into resilience across discount retail, packaged foods, and broad-line retailing.
DG Overview and Recent Performance
Dollar General Corporation (DG), a leading discount retailer with over 20,000 stores targeting rural and suburban communities, focuses on consumables, seasonal goods, and everyday essentials. In recent market activity, DG shares have shown strong momentum, trading around $146 with YTD gains exceeding 15% and a remarkable 112% rise over the past year. This performance stems from better-than-expected Q3 earnings, where EPS beat estimates amid cost-conscious shopping trends boosting same-store sales. Analyst sentiment has improved, with price targets raised to $165-$168 citing turnaround progress, though challenges like store safety closures persist. Broader recovery in value retail has supported relative strength versus peers.
MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance
Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ), a global leader in snacks with brands like Oreo and Cadbury, operates in over 150 countries emphasizing chocolate, biscuits, and beverages. Recent weeks have seen MDLZ shares around $58, with YTD performance at +8% but a 1-year decline of nearly 10%, reflecting pressures from elevated cocoa costs and cautious 2026 guidance post-Q4 results. Organic net revenue grew 5.1% in Q4, yet volume declines and input inflation eroded margins, prompting mixed analyst views. The stock's low beta of 0.37 underscores defensive appeal in volatile conditions, though acquisition costs and consumer shifts toward value have tempered sentiment.
TGT Overview and Recent Performance
Target Corporation (TGT), a major general merchandise retailer with nearly 2,000 stores, offers apparel, groceries, and household items via physical and digital channels. In recent market activity, TGT shares hover near $121, posting robust YTD gains of +24% fueled by a Q4 earnings beat and upbeat 2026 outlook, including over 30 new stores and $2 billion in investments for remodels and AI-driven growth. Despite prior sales softness, essentials like food and beauty drove gains, with analysts lifting targets post-strategic updates. Investor Day catalysts have boosted sentiment, though traffic challenges linger.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds of bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts, and styles including technical, fundamental, and pattern recognition. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions—based on metrics like annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Examples include bots targeting aerospace with +80% returns and 82% win rates, semiconductors at +103%/71%, and infrastructure at +68%/74%. These bots cover sectors from energy to volatility plays, offering varied risk profiles. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligned with your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
DG, MDLZ, and TGT span discount retail, consumer staples, and broad-line merchandising, with distinct growth drivers and risks. DG's small-format, rural focus yields high density and value appeal, outperforming on momentum (YTD +15%) but exposing it to operational risks like compliance. MDLZ benefits from global brand moats and recurring demand, yet cocoa volatility hampers margins, reflected in its stable but lagging 1-year performance (-10%). TGT leverages larger assortments and omnichannel scale for higher tickets, with recent catalysts like store expansions aiding recovery (YTD +24%), though discretionary exposure heightens cyclicality. Valuation-wise, DG trades at a premium P/E amid growth, MDLZ at 31x with defensive beta, and TGT appears attractive post-earnings. Sentiment favors DG and TGT for retail rebound, while MDLZ suits stability seekers; trade-offs hinge on consumer spending resilience versus input costs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors DG based on superior trend consistency, relative outperformance, and positive analyst revisions signaling sustained momentum in value retail. Its stability in recent weeks, coupled with catalysts like earnings beats, positions it probabilistically ahead of MDLZ's cost pressures and TGT's higher execution risks in turnaround mode, though all warrant monitoring amid sector rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TGT’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- DG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TGT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TGT’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TGT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
DG (@Discount Stores) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.69% , and TGT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +2.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
DG is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
TGT is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Discount Stores (+0.71% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| DG | MDLZ | TGT | |
| Capitalization | 26.4B | 75.8B | 56.2B |
| EBITDA | 3.24B | 4.97B | 8.4B |
| Gain YTD | -8.992 | 10.722 | 28.175 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.48 | 31.26 | 15.26 |
| Revenue | 42.7B | 38.5B | 105B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 1.04B |
| Total Debt | 15.7B | 21.8B | 20B |
DG | MDLZ | TGT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 19 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 71 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 53 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 18 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DG (33) in the Discount Stores industry, and is in the same range as TGT (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to DG’s and similarly to TGT’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DG (100) in the Discount Stores industry, and is in the same range as TGT (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to DG’s and similarly to TGT’s over the last 12 months.
TGT's SMR Rating (37) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DG (45) in the Discount Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that TGT's stock grew similarly to DG’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
TGT's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for DG (57) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that TGT's stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than DG’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as TGT (25) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for DG (55) in the Discount Stores industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to TGT’s and somewhat faster than DG’s over the last 12 months.
| DG | MDLZ | TGT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 64% | 9 days ago 49% | 21 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQQS | 36.04 | 0.41 | +1.16% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | |||
| DHDG | 34.13 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF | |||
| NKX | 12.16 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| IBIE | 26.22 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term Tips ETF | |||
| AMLP | 52.36 | -0.15 | -0.29% |
| Alerian MLP ETF | |||
DG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DG has been loosely correlated with DLTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DG jumps, then DLTR could also see price increases.
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||
TGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGT has been loosely correlated with DLTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGT jumps, then DLTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGT | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| DLTR - TGT | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| WMT - TGT | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| OLLI - TGT | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
| PSMT - TGT | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.94% | ||
| COST - TGT | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||