DG
Price
$115.73
Change
-$4.02 (-3.36%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
25.49B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$166.15
Change
+$3.08 (+1.89%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
28.81B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$58.34
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
126.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DG or STZ or UL

Header iconDG vs STZ vs UL Comparison
Open Charts DG vs STZ vs ULBanner chart's image
DG vs STZ vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dollar General (DG) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • DG has experienced sharp declines in recent weeks amid CEO transition and post-earnings pressures, down over 20% in the past month, contrasting with its strong Q4 revenue beat.
  • STZ shows relative stability around $152, with year-to-date gains of about 11% despite beer segment challenges, buoyed by analyst upgrades ahead of Q4 earnings.
  • UL has declined amid strategic reviews of its food business, including potential spin-off talks with McCormick, but maintains steady consumer staples positioning with YTD returns around 6%.
  • Across recent market activity, STZ leads in relative performance stability, while DG lags due to heightened volatility and leadership changes.
  • All three stocks operate in consumer-facing sectors sensitive to economic shifts, with UL offering defensive traits through diversified essentials.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines DG, STZ, and UL—representing discount retail, premium beverages, and global consumer goods—in the context of evolving consumer spending patterns and macroeconomic pressures. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and sector resilience will find value in analyzing their recent trajectories. With discount retailers facing margin squeezes, beverage firms navigating volume shifts, and staples giants pursuing portfolio optimization, this head-to-head highlights trade-offs in growth drivers, risk profiles, and market positioning amid recent volatility.

DG Overview and Recent Performance

Dollar General (DG) operates over 20,000 discount stores primarily in rural U.S. communities, emphasizing consumables like food, household essentials, and health products that account for roughly 80% of sales. In recent market activity, DG shares have declined sharply, dropping about 23% over the past month to around $118, influenced by a CEO transition announcing Jerry Fleeman Jr. as successor effective January 2027 and investor concerns over sales growth amid competitive pressures. Despite a strong Q4 earnings beat with $10.91 billion in revenue and $1.93 EPS, sentiment has softened due to cautious guidance and SKU reductions aimed at improving in-stocks. Year-to-date, DG is down over 11%, underperforming broader retail amid shifting consumer behaviors.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands (STZ) is a leading producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits, with key brands like Corona and Modelo driving its U.S.-focused beer segment. Recent weeks have seen STZ trade stably around $152, reflecting modest fluctuations but year-to-date gains of approximately 11% as analysts upgrade outlooks ahead of April 8 Q4 earnings. Challenges in beer volumes and wine/spirits restructuring have tempered momentum, yet Citi's recent shift to Buy highlights recovery potential in premium imports. Over the past month, shares dipped about 2%, but relative stability persists amid broader consumer defensive positioning, supported by strategic divestitures enhancing margins.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

Unilever (UL), a multinational consumer goods giant, spans beauty, personal care, home care, and foods with iconic brands like Hellmann's and Dove. In recent market activity, UL shares have softened to around $61, down amid explorations of spinning off its foods unit—potentially valued in tens of billions—in talks with McCormick, aligning with a shift toward higher-margin beauty and wellbeing. Year-to-date returns hover near 6%, with underlying sales growth of 3.5% in 2025 underscoring resilience despite FX headwinds and portfolio reshaping. Sentiment reflects balanced execution in staples amid economic caution.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions earn a spot in this dynamic section, where bots like those targeting tech ETFs have posted 30-day annualized returns up to 171% with 100% win rates on select trades, and others in aerospace/defense achieved 124% annualized gains. These AI agents leverage advanced financial learning models for price action, patterns, and risk management, often outperforming benchmarks with win rates above 90% in leveraged plays. Explore the Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligned with current volatility and sector rotations.

Head-to-Head Comparison

DG’s discount retail model thrives on value-seeking rural consumers but faces acute margin pressures and competition, contrasting STZ’s premium beer focus with volume recovery potential amid import trends. UL offers broader diversification across essentials, buffering cyclicality better than peers. Recent momentum favors STZ’s stability over DG’s volatility and UL’s strategic flux. Risk factors include DG’s leadership shift, STZ’s beer slowdowns, and UL’s divestiture uncertainties. Valuation-wise, DG trades at a forward P/E around 20x, potentially attractive if margins expand, while STZ and UL emphasize defensive yields. Market sentiment tilts toward staples resilience in uncertain environments.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors STZ for its trend consistency, year-to-date outperformance, and positioning ahead of earnings catalysts, offering a probabilistic edge in relative stability over DG’s downside momentum and UL’s restructuring overhang.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (DG: $115.73STZ: $166.15UL: $58.34)
Brand notoriety: DG and STZ are notable and UL is not notable
DG represents the Discount Stores industry, STZ is part of the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry, and UL is in the Household/Personal Care industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DG: 106%, STZ: 203%, UL: 84%
Market capitalization -- DG: $25.49B, STZ: $28.81B, UL: $126.01B
DG [@Discount Stores] is valued at $25.49B. STZ’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $28.81B. UL [@Household/Personal Care] has a market capitalization of $126.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $1.01T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $146.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $337.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $116.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $25.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $19.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DG is a better buy in the long-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than DG and STZ.

Price Growth

DG (@Discount Stores) experienced а -2.89% price change this week, while STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +9.89% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

DG is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-0.78% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.29% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($126B) has a higher market cap than STZ($28.8B) and DG($25.5B). UL has higher P/E ratio than STZ and DG: UL (19.32) vs STZ (17.29) and DG (16.89). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 21.217 vs. UL (-10.115) and DG (-12.047). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.3B vs. DG (3.24B) and STZ (2.47B). STZ has less debt than DG and UL: STZ (10.7B) vs DG (15.7B) and UL (). UL has higher revenues than DG and STZ: UL (59.8B) vs DG (42.7B) and STZ (9.38B).
DGSTZUL
Capitalization25.5B28.8B126B
EBITDA3.24B2.47B11.3B
Gain YTD-12.04721.217-10.115
P/E Ratio16.8917.2919.32
Revenue42.7B9.38B59.8B
Total CashN/A152MN/A
Total Debt15.7B10.7BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DG vs STZ vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
DG
STZ
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51851
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010079
SMR RATING
1..100
455596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
594877
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
627780
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DG's Valuation (31) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as STZ (49) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that DG's stock grew similarly to UL’s and similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as DG (100) in the Discount Stores industry, and is in the same range as STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that UL's stock grew similarly to DG’s and similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

DG's SMR Rating (45) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that DG's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as DG (59) in the Discount Stores industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to DG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

DG's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Discount Stores industry is in the same range as STZ (77) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as UL (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that DG's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DGSTZUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBDR24.200.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF
ROAM32.650.01
+0.03%
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Mkts ETF
DFEB48.41-0.04
-0.08%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb
NBFC50.81-0.08
-0.17%
Neuberger Flexible Credit Income ETF
SETH44.41-0.69
-1.53%
ProShares Short Ether ETF

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
+1.89%
SAM - STZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
TAP - STZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
BUD - STZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-0.21%
PG - UL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
CL - UL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
RBGLY - UL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
CHD - UL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
CLX - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
More