Advertisement
DUK or ED or EMA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) vs. Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs. Emera Incorporated (EMA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- DUK trades at a P/E of 20.2 with a 3.34% dividend yield, showing YTD gains of about 9.7% amid strong Q1 2026 earnings.
- ED offers a lower beta of 0.29 and 3.17% yield, with top YTD performance at 11.3%, bolstered by its urban New York focus.
- EMA provides the highest yield at 4.04% and strongest 1-year return of 22.2%, driven by diverse North American and Caribbean operations.
- All three exhibit low betas (0.29-0.46), signaling defensive stability in volatile markets, with recent utility sector strength from infrastructure and load growth.
- DUK leads in scale with $99B market cap and $32B revenue, while ED and EMA emphasize regional reliability.
- Valuations cluster around 19-21 P/E, reflecting balanced growth prospects amid rising energy demand.
Introduction
This comparison examines DUK, ED, and EMA, three regulated utility stocks offering stability through electricity and gas distribution. Investors seeking defensive positions with reliable dividends and low volatility—such as retirees or those hedging against market downturns—may find value here. In recent market activity, utilities have gained traction due to infrastructure investments, data center demand, and clean energy transitions, providing relative outperformance versus broader indices. This analysis highlights their business models, performance, and positioning for informed stock comparison decisions.
DUK Overview and Recent Performance
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is a major U.S. energy provider serving over 8 million electric and 1.6 million natural gas customers across the Carolinas, Florida, Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky. It generates power from a mix of nuclear, natural gas, renewables, coal, and hydro sources, with segments in electric utilities/infrastructure and gas utilities/infrastructure.
In recent weeks, DUK shares have hovered around $127, within a 52-week range of $111-$134, reflecting resilience amid sector rotation into defensives. Year-to-date gains stand at 9.7%, with 1-year returns near 8.5%. Q1 2026 earnings beat expectations, driven by infrastructure recovery and weather, boosting sentiment. A $5 billion customer savings initiative and grid investments for load growth have supported steady performance, underpinned by a low beta of 0.40 and EPS (TTM) of $6.31.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) delivers regulated electric, gas, and steam to 3.7 million electric, 1.1 million gas, and 1,490 steam customers primarily in New York City, Westchester County, and parts of New Jersey. Its infrastructure includes extensive transmission and distribution networks focused on urban density.
Recent market activity shows ED at about $110, in a 52-week band of $95-$116. It leads YTD with 11.3% gains, though 1-year returns are 3%. Anticipation for Q1 earnings and recognition as a low-beta defensive (0.29) amid low consumer sentiment have lifted shares. Steady dividend appeal and transmission investments influence positive sentiment, with EPS (TTM) at $5.63 and revenue of $16.9B supporting reliability.
EMA Overview and Recent Performance
Emera Incorporated (EMA) operates in electricity generation, transmission, and distribution across the U.S. (Florida), Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas, with segments including Florida Electric, Canadian Electric, Gas Utilities, and Others. It emphasizes renewable transitions and energy services.
EMA trades near $53 USD (NYSE), within $42-$54, with YTD up 7.6% and robust 1-year gains of 22.2%. Recent leadership transitions and note redemptions reflect financial maneuvers, while geographic diversity aids resilience (beta 0.46). Dividend strength and capital plans for low-carbon shifts drive sentiment, backed by EPS (TTM) of $2.49 and $8.8B revenue.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These bots, powered by advanced AI models, deliver signals for copy trading with impressive stats: annualized returns up to 162%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7. Focused on high-growth areas like semiconductors, industrials, and energy, they outperform via momentum, sector rotation, and risk management (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors). Virtual and brokerage agents simulate real portfolios, beating S&P 500 benchmarks in volatile conditions. Traders can explore these elite performers to enhance strategies—visit Trending AI Robots for real-time insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
DUK, ED, and EMA share regulated utility models emphasizing stable cash flows from essential services, but differ in scale and exposure. DUK's vast U.S. footprint ($99B cap, $32B revenue) drives growth via grid modernization, contrasting ED's dense urban New York operations ($40B cap) with lower risk (beta 0.29) but slower expansion. EMA ($16B cap) offers international diversification, higher yield (4.04%), and superior 1-year momentum from Florida and Canadian assets.
Recent momentum favors ED YTD, but EMA excels longer-term. Risks include regulatory hurdles and interest rate sensitivity (all P/E 19-21), with DUK most exposed to Southeast weather. Sector tailwinds like data centers boost all, yet ED and EMA trade at slight valuation discounts versus DUK. Sentiment tilts positive on infrastructure catalysts, balancing yield versus growth trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI leans toward ED in the current environment, given its leading YTD stability, lowest beta, and defensive positioning amid economic uncertainty. Consistent earnings outlook and urban load growth provide trend reliability, with probabilistic edge over peers in relative performance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DUK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and EMA’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- DUK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DUK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and EMA’s TA Score reflects 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DUK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- EMA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DUK (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while ED (@Electric Utilities) price change was -3.12% , and EMA (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -0.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
DUK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
EMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.64% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| DUK | ED | EMA | |
| Capitalization | 97.4B | 39.1B | 16B |
| EBITDA | 17.6B | 6.35B | 3.51B |
| Gain YTD | 7.468 | 7.777 | 6.072 |
| P/E Ratio | 19.22 | 17.91 | 21.84 |
| Revenue | 33.2B | 17.2B | 8.91B |
| Total Cash | 2.14B | 147M | 2.46B |
| Total Debt | 91.2B | 27.2B | 24B |
DUK | ED | EMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 50 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 22 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 75 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 58 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 57 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 65 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMA's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DUK (56) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA's stock grew similarly to DUK’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as DUK (28) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EMA (77) in the null industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to DUK’s and somewhat faster than EMA’s over the last 12 months.
DUK's SMR Rating (70) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (75) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as EMA (77) in the null industry. This means that DUK's stock grew similarly to ED’s and similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DUK (58) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA's stock grew similarly to DUK’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as DUK (49) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that EMA's stock grew similarly to DUK’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| DUK | ED | EMA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 15 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 42% | 6 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 24% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CBXA | 22.98 | 0.13 | +0.56% |
| Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | |||
| AAPR | 29.49 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2028 | |||
| UXJA | 37.47 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Uncppd Acceler ETF - Jan | |||
| UDEC | 41.23 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec | |||
| JPIB | 48.02 | -0.10 | -0.21% |
| JPMorgan International Bond Opps ETF | |||
DUK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DUK has been closely correlated with SO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DUK jumps, then SO could also see price increases.
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.
EMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then ED could also see price increases.