Advertisement
ECG or FLR or MTZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Everus Construction Group (ECG) vs. Fluor Corporation (FLR) vs. MasTec (MTZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ECG and MTZ lead with YTD returns exceeding 96% and 101%, respectively, outpacing FLR's 34% amid infrastructure demand.
- Recent Q1 earnings beats for ECG (EPS $1.14 vs. $0.85 est.) and MTZ (EPS $1.39 vs. $0.98 est.) drove sharp gains, with both raising full-year guidance.
- MTZ boasts the largest market cap at $34.6B and record $20.3B backlog, signaling robust multi-year visibility.
- All three operate in the Engineering & Construction industry, benefiting from energy transition and data center builds, but FLR shows lower P/E at 2.71 due to negative EPS.
- Backlog growth is strong across the board: ECG at $3.68B (up 14%), highlighting sector momentum in recent market activity.
- Relative performance favors MTZ and ECG for momentum traders, while FLR offers value sensitivity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines ECG, FLR, and MTZ, three players in the Engineering & Construction sector. These companies provide critical infrastructure services amid rising demand for power delivery, renewables, and data centers driven by AI and energy transitions. Traders seeking momentum in high-growth industrials or investors eyeing relative performance in backlog-rich firms will find value here. Recent quarters highlight contrasts in earnings execution and guidance, offering insights into market positioning and sentiment shifts in this cyclical space.
ECG Overview and Recent Performance
Everus Construction Group, Inc. (ECG) is a U.S.-focused specialty contractor operating in Electrical & Mechanical (E&M) and Transmission & Distribution (T&D) segments. It delivers construction and maintenance for electrical wiring, fire suppression, renewables infrastructure, and utility lines to utilities, industrials, and government clients.
In recent market activity, ECG shares surged 11.5% to $168.32 following Q1 2026 results, with revenue up 25% to $1.04B and EPS of $1.14 beating estimates by 34%. EBITDA rose 44% to $88.9M, supported by a $3.68B backlog (up 14%). The April acquisition of SE&M for $158M expanded Southeast presence, boosting sentiment. YTD gains of 97% and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) reflect optimism in grid and data center tailwinds, though high P/E of 42.5 signals growth pricing.
FLR Overview and Recent Performance
Fluor Corporation (FLR) delivers global engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services through Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions segments. It supports advanced manufacturing, energy transition (including nuclear and hydrogen), and government projects.
FLR traded at $52.99 with YTD returns of 34%, trailing peers but stable amid sector volatility. Shares reflect steady execution with a $25.5B backlog (81% reimbursable), emphasizing low-risk contracts. Low P/E of 2.71 stems from negative EPS (-$0.31 TTM), influenced by NuScale investment volatility. Recent weeks show resilience in reimbursable awards (87% of new $12B), with Q1 earnings due May 8. Sentiment ties to energy transition catalysts, though less momentum than specialty peers.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) specializes in infrastructure engineering across Communications, Clean Energy, Power Delivery, Pipeline, and Other segments, serving U.S. and Canada markets with buildout, maintenance, and upgrades for utilities, renewables, and fiber networks.
MTZ reached $437.51, up 2.85% recently, with YTD gains of 101% fueled by record Q1 revenue of $3.83B (up 34%, beating by 10%) and adjusted EPS $1.39 (up 174%). Adjusted EBITDA climbed 73% to $284M, backed by a $20.3B backlog. Raised 2026 guidance to $17.5B revenue underscores data center and clean energy demand. P/E at 76.8 prices in scale, with multi-week strength enhancing trader interest.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots from a library of 351, curated for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML pattern recognition (5-60 minute timeframes), trend trading with fundamentals, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL). Performance highlights include annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and portfolios of 1-18 tickers targeting sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and volatility plays. Traders can copy real-time signals via virtual or brokerage agents, tailoring risk with customizable balances. Explore these high-conviction options to align with dynamic conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ECG, FLR, and MTZ share Engineering & Construction exposure but diverge in scale and focus. MTZ’s diversified model (five segments) and $34.6B cap dwarf ECG ($8.6B) and FLR ($7.6B), driving superior revenue ($14B+ TTM) and backlog visibility. Growth drivers favor MTZ and ECG in U.S. grid/data centers, while FLR leverages global EPC reimbursables (81% backlog) for stability.
Recent momentum is strongest for MTZ (101% YTD) and ECG (97%), vs. FLR’s 34%, tied to earnings beats and guidance hikes. Risk factors include FLR’s negative EPS/legacy exposures, MTZ’s $2.8B debt, and ECG’s newer status. Valuation sensitivity shows FLR cheapest (P/E 2.7), but MTZ/high P/E reflect growth premiums. Sentiment leans bullish on infrastructure spend, with trade-offs in size vs. agility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTZ due to its unmatched scale, record backlog, and consistent trend strength post-Q1 beat. Probabilistic edge stems from diversified catalysts in clean energy/power delivery and raised guidance, positioning it ahead in momentum and stability relative to ECG’s regional focus and FLR’s pending earnings.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MTZ’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- ECG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and MTZ’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ECG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ECG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -5.28% price change this week, while FLR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -15.59% , and MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated -3.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.80% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| ECG | FLR | MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 8.14B | 6.25B | 33.2B |
| EBITDA | 337M | -201M | 1.22B |
| Gain YTD | 86.349 | 12.869 | 93.357 |
| P/E Ratio | 36.49 | 20.42 | 73.61 |
| Revenue | 3.96B | 15.5B | 15.3B |
| Total Cash | 293M | 3.77B | 274M |
| Total Debt | 363M | 1.07B | 3.02B |
FLR | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLR's Valuation (78) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (91). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (56). This means that MTZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (58) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (91). This means that MTZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (61). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (24). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| ECG | FLR | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SILJ | 34.18 | 0.40 | +1.18% |
| Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | |||
| RND | 31.48 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| TXXI | 50.52 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF | |||
| DFP | 20.91 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| FLAHERTY & CRUMRINE DYNAMIC PREFERRED AND Income FUND | |||
| MBSD | 20.59 | -0.08 | -0.39% |
| FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS ETF | |||
ECG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECG has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECG jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECG | 100% | -2.69% | ||
| FIX - ECG | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| STRL - ECG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| MTZ - ECG | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| PWR - ECG | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| IESC - ECG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||