Advertisement
EL or KO or MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Coca-Cola (KO) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EL trades at a forward P/E of 31 amid volatility from tariffs and acquisitions like Forest Essentials, with YTD gains of -11% but strong 1-year return of +32%.
- KO demonstrates stability with a 25x trailing P/E, 10% YTD gains, consistent dividends raised for the 64th year, and new CEO appointment focusing on cash flows.
- MNST shows robust Q4 growth with 18% revenue increase but post-earnings dips due to tariff concerns; YTD +1%, high P/E of 39 signals growth premium.
- KO leads in market cap ($331B) and dividend reliability, while MNST excels in revenue growth; EL appears undervalued per DCF models.
- Recent market activity highlights consumer staples resilience, with KO and MNST in beverages outperforming EL's beauty sector volatility.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines EL (Estée Lauder), a leader in prestige beauty, against beverage giants KO (Coca-Cola) and MNST (Monster Beverage). These companies operate in consumer-facing sectors sensitive to economic shifts, tariffs, and consumer trends. Investors seeking relative performance insights, valuation trade-offs, and momentum in staples versus discretionary will find value here, particularly amid recent volatility in beauty and strength in beverages. The analysis draws on current market data for informed relative positioning.
EL Overview and Recent Performance
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) is a global leader in prestige beauty, offering skincare, makeup, and fragrance brands like Estée Lauder and Clinique. In recent market activity, EL shares have shown volatility, trading around $93 with a 52-week range of $48-$122. YTD performance stands at -11%, lagging the S&P 500, though 1-year returns reached +32%. Key influences include the planned full acquisition of Indian brand Forest Essentials to bolster Asia growth and skincare strength, offsetting tariff headwinds estimated at $100M. A lawsuit against Walmart for counterfeits and dividend ex-date effects contributed to recent declines. Analysts view it as undervalued via DCF at ~$98 intrinsic value, with average targets at $110.
KO Overview and Recent Performance
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) dominates non-alcoholic beverages with iconic brands worldwide. Shares hover near $77, within a 52-week range of $65-$82, posting solid YTD gains of +10% and 1-year returns of +13%. Recent weeks featured a leadership transition appointing Henrique Braun as CEO, alongside a 4% dividend hike—the 64th consecutive increase—yielding 2.7%. Full-year 2025 revenue hit $47.9B, with Q4 at $11.8B amid 2-5% organic growth guidance. Digital transformation and cash allocation focus drive sentiment, with analysts overweight and targets averaging $83. Stability in consumer staples has supported steady performance despite modest volume pressures.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) specializes in energy drinks, partnering with Coca-Cola for distribution. Trading at ~$76 in a 52-week range of $54-$87, YTD return is +1% with stronger 1-year gains of +36%. Q4 FY25 results beat estimates: net sales +18% to $2.13B, EPS +65% to $0.46, driven by Monster Energy growth despite alcohol brands' dip. Shares fell post-earnings on tariff and cost concerns, but institutional inflows and leadership reshuffles for global expansion sustain optimism. Analysts maintain overweight ratings, targeting ~$87 on average, highlighting international revenue momentum.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers using technical and fundamental signals across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current volatility—scoring high on AI metrics like win rates (up to 95%), profit factors (over 20x), and annualized returns (32% to 215%)—earn a spot. Examples include AeroDefense bots at +97% annualized with 72% win rates and 2.7 profit factors, or multi-ticker strategies yielding +134% returns. These bots vary in styles (scalping to swing), timeframes (5min to 60min), and risk profiles, enabling tailored copy trading. Explore Trending AI Robots to subscribe and deploy proven performers in today's market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
EL, KO, and MNST span beauty and beverages, with KO's mature model emphasizing dividends (2.7% yield) contrasting MNST's high-growth energy niche (17% quarterly revenue surge). Growth drivers: MNST leads at 66% earnings growth, EL via acquisitions, KO through volume stability. Recent momentum favors KO (10% YTD), with EL volatile (-11% YTD) and MNST mixed post-earnings. Risks include tariffs hitting all, but EL highest debt/equity (233%). Valuation: KO cheapest (25x P/E), MNST premium (39x), EL transitional. Sentiment tilts to staples amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI favors KO in the current environment due to trend consistency, dividend stability, and lower valuation sensitivity versus peers. Its relative positioning in consumer staples, leadership catalysts, and outperformance (10% YTD) suggest higher probability of resilience amid volatility, though MNST growth could prevail on positive tariff resolutions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MNST’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- EL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and MNST’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +4.86% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -2.23% , and MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +1.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2073.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
EL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.
KO is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.77% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| EL | KO | MNST | |
| Capitalization | 27.6B | 326B | 75B |
| EBITDA | 1.39B | 18.7B | 2.53B |
| Gain YTD | -27.006 | 9.084 | 0.065 |
| P/E Ratio | 147.80 | 24.91 | 39.55 |
| Revenue | 14.7B | 47.9B | 8.29B |
| Total Cash | 3.08B | N/A | 2.77B |
| Total Debt | 9.39B | 45.5B | 199M |
EL | KO | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 71 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 41 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 13 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 20 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 52 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 78 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EL (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to EL’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EL (91) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as EL (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to KO’s and similarly to EL’s over the last 12 months.
EL's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MNST (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (78) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that EL's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.
| EL | KO | MNST | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 11 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 30% | 5 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 15% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 21% | 3 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVLV | 85.37 | 0.76 | +0.90% |
| Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| NDMO | 10.33 | 0.03 | +0.29% |
| Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund | |||
| PSH | 50.28 | 0.12 | +0.24% |
| PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF | |||
| RFLR | 30.13 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Mgd Flr ETF | |||
| WRND | 39.80 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | |||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||