EL
Price
$73.29
Change
+$1.85 (+2.59%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
26.51B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$59.09
Change
+$0.26 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
75.84B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGT
Price
$124.04
Change
+$0.92 (+0.75%)
Updated
Apr 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
56.17B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EL or MDLZ or TGT

Header iconEL vs MDLZ vs TGT Comparison
Open Charts EL vs MDLZ vs TGTBanner chart's image
EL vs MDLZ vs TGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Mondelez (MDLZ) vs. Target (TGT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • EL shares have shown volatility with recent dips amid legal actions and mixed earnings, underperforming YTD at around -16% while trading near $84.
  • MDLZ faces headwinds from high cocoa costs, with shares down 1.82% recently to $54.35, YTD up slightly at +1%, but 1-year returns lag at -14%.
  • TGT leads YTD performance at +20%, trading around $116, bolstered by strategic investments and Q4 earnings beat despite sales challenges.
  • Consumer staples like MDLZ offer stability with a 3.68% dividend yield, while retail-focused TGT shows stronger momentum.
  • Prestige beauty EL reports sales growth under its turnaround but grapples with regional slowdowns and higher beta risk.
  • Relative performance highlights TGT's outperformance amid broader market positioning in discount retail.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines EL (Estée Lauder), a prestige beauty leader; MDLZ (Mondelez), a global snacking giant; and TGT (Target), a major discount retailer. These consumer-facing stocks span beauty, staples, and general merchandise, offering insights into sector resilience amid economic shifts. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye relative performance, while long-term investors could assess stability, dividends, and growth catalysts. In recent market activity, divergent trends in sales recovery, cost pressures, and strategic investments underscore key trade-offs for portfolio positioning.

EL Overview and Recent Performance

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) is a global leader in prestige beauty, with brands like La Mer, Clinique, and Jo Malone spanning skincare (49% of sales), makeup, fragrance, and hair care. Products are sold via department stores, specialty retailers, and digital channels worldwide. Recent market activity has seen EL shares volatile, trading around $84 after a 7.9% drop amid a lawsuit against Jo Malone for trademark issues and broader sector declines. YTD returns lag at -16%, contrasting 1-year gains of +34%. Q2 fiscal 2026 results showed 4% organic sales growth to $4.16 billion, with raised full-year outlook under the "Beauty Reimagined" turnaround, though Americas demand and profitability challenges weigh on sentiment. Skincare strength and China recovery efforts support gradual stabilization.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International Inc. (MDLZ) specializes in snacks, with iconic brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Ritz driving biscuits (49%), chocolate (31%), and candy sales across 150+ countries. Operations emphasize emerging markets (one-third revenue) and sustainability in packaging and sourcing. In recent weeks, MDLZ shares dipped 1.82% to $54.35, pressured by persistent high cocoa prices prompting chocolate innovation shifts and muted 2026 guidance (flat-to-2% organic growth). YTD up +1%, but 1-year returns at -14% reflect volume softness in North America. Q4 2025 revenues rose 9.3% to $10.5 billion, beating estimates, with emerging markets up 13%. Dividend yield at 3.68% bolsters defensive appeal amid cost headwinds.

TGT Overview and Recent Performance

Target Corporation (TGT) is a leading U.S. discount retailer offering apparel, groceries, beauty, electronics, and household essentials through 2,000+ stores and digital platforms. Emphasis on owned brands, same-day delivery, and omnichannel fulfillment differentiates its model. Recent performance shines, with shares around $116 after a 2.55% dip, leading YTD at +20% versus S&P 500's +2.5%. Q4 2025 sales hit $30.45 billion (in-line), EPS $2.44 beating estimates; February sales accelerated positively. New CEO's $2 billion 2026 investment in stores, AI tech, and pricing on 3,000+ items signals turnaround momentum. Traffic trends improved in essentials and digital, offsetting prior declines and positioning for sustained growth.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each trading thousands of tickers across diverse strategies like trend-following, volatility plays, and sector rotations. Only those excelling in current conditions—such as high volatility or momentum shifts—earn a spot, with real-time stats including annualized returns up to +216%, win rates of 53-95%, profit factors to 25.8, and drawdowns managed via risk controls. Timeframes span 5min to 60min, covering stocks, ETFs, and crypto in sectors like semiconductors and aerospace. These bots enable copy trading for users seeking data-driven edges. Explore the Trending AI Robots to identify suitable options for today's market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

EL, MDLZ, and TGT contrast in business models: prestige beauty versus stable snacking staples and cyclical discount retail. Growth drivers differ—EL's skincare innovation and turnaround versus MDLZ's emerging market pricing power and TGT's omnichannel expansions. Recent momentum favors TGT (YTD +20%) over MDLZ (+1%) and EL (-16%). Risk factors include EL's high beta (1.11) and China exposure, MDLZ's commodity costs, and TGT's consumer traffic sensitivity. Sector exposure tilts defensive for MDLZ, discretionary for others. Valuation sensitivity shows MDLZ P/E at 29x with yield appeal; market sentiment leans toward TGT's catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently favors TGT due to superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and clear catalysts like $2 billion investments in stores and AI-driven growth. Relative positioning amid retail recovery edges it over MDLZ's cost stability and EL's volatility, though probabilistic shifts could arise with commodity relief or beauty rebounds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (EL: $73.29MDLZ: $59.09TGT: $124.03)
Brand notoriety: MDLZ and TGT are notable and EL is not notable
EL represents the Household/Personal Care industry, MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry, and TGT is in the Discount Stores industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EL: 74%, MDLZ: 70%, TGT: 84%
Market capitalization -- EL: $26.51B, MDLZ: $75.84B, TGT: $56.17B
EL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $26.51B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $75.84B. TGT [@Discount Stores] has a market capitalization of $56.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $340.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $75.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $1.03T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $119.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TGT’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGT is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than EL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TGT’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EL is a better buy in the short-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than TGT.

Price Growth

EL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +6.03% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.69% , and TGT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +2.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

EL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

TGT is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Discount Stores (+0.71% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($75.8B) has a higher market cap than TGT($56.2B) and EL($26.5B). EL has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ and TGT: EL (147.80) vs MDLZ (31.26) and TGT (15.26). TGT YTD gains are higher at: 27.235 vs. MDLZ (10.722) and EL (-29.794). TGT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.4B vs. MDLZ (4.97B) and EL (1.39B). EL has less debt than TGT and MDLZ: EL (9.39B) vs TGT (20B) and MDLZ (21.8B). TGT has higher revenues than MDLZ and EL: TGT (105B) vs MDLZ (38.5B) and EL (14.7B).
ELMDLZTGT
Capitalization26.5B75.8B56.2B
EBITDA1.39B4.97B8.4B
Gain YTD-29.79410.72227.235
P/E Ratio147.8031.2615.26
Revenue14.7B38.5B105B
Total Cash3.08BN/A1.04B
Total Debt9.39B21.8B20B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EL vs MDLZ vs TGT: Fundamental Ratings
EL
MDLZ
TGT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59198
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071100
SMR RATING
1..100
907137
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
645343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8548

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as EL (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as TGT (57) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to EL’s and similarly to TGT’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as EL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as TGT (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to EL’s and similarly to TGT’s over the last 12 months.

TGT's SMR Rating (37) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (90) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that TGT's stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.

TGT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as EL (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that TGT's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to EL’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as TGT (24) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as EL (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to TGT’s and similarly to EL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMDLZTGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URNJ30.050.21
+0.70%
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
HWSM27.59N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd
INTF40.87-0.08
-0.20%
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
BUZZ29.90-0.12
-0.40%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
MZZ6.84-0.03
-0.49%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400

EL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EL has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EL jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EL
1D Price
Change %
EL100%
+2.59%
COTY - EL
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IPAR - EL
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
ELF - EL
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.50%
NWL - EL
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.66%
LRLCY - EL
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.44%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More

TGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGT has been loosely correlated with DLTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGT jumps, then DLTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGT
1D Price
Change %
TGT100%
+3.01%
DLTR - TGT
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
WMT - TGT
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
OLLI - TGT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
PSMT - TGT
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.27%
COST - TGT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
More