EL
Price
$76.20
Change
+$0.86 (+1.14%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
27.56B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$162.28
Change
-$1.97 (-1.20%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
28.14B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMT
Price
$127.50
Change
+$2.68 (+2.15%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.02T
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EL or STZ or WMT

Header iconEL vs STZ vs WMT Comparison
Open Charts EL vs STZ vs WMTBanner chart's image
EL vs STZ vs WMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) vs. Walmart (WMT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • EL has faced sharp declines in recent market activity, dropping over 30% in the past month amid merger talks with Puig and ongoing turnaround challenges in prestige beauty.
  • STZ shows relative stability with modest fluctuations around the $150 level, supported by steady demand for beer brands like Modelo and Corona despite demand pressures.
  • WMT maintains resilient performance near $120, benefiting from its omnichannel retail scale and value positioning in consumer staples amid economic uncertainty.
  • Year-to-date, WMT leads with approximately 10% gains, followed by STZ at around 12%, while EL lags significantly due to sector headwinds.
  • Volatility is highest in EL, with recent trading volumes spiking, contrasting WMT's steady liquidity and STZ's balanced momentum.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines EL, STZ, and WMT—representing prestige beauty, premium beverages, and discount retail—in the context of shifting consumer spending patterns and market volatility. These consumer defensive names offer insights into sector resilience amid economic pressures. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on long-term stability will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles for informed portfolio decisions in today's environment.

EL Overview and Recent Performance

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) is a global leader in prestige beauty, manufacturing and marketing skincare, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products across over 20 brands like Estée Lauder, Clinique, and La Mer, sold in approximately 150 countries. In recent market activity, EL has experienced significant downward pressure, plummeting around 9-10% in single sessions amid confirmation of merger discussions with Puig, which raised concerns over its turnaround strategy. Over the past month, shares have declined sharply from above $110 to near $71-79, reflecting volatility from weak forecasts, sluggish Americas demand, and negative net margins despite gross margin stability at ~74%. Elevated trading volumes underscore shifting sentiment in the cosmetics sector.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands Inc. (STZ) is a leading producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits, with key brands including Corona, Modelo Especial, and Robert Mondavi, operating in the U.S., Mexico, New Zealand, and Italy. Recent weeks have seen STZ trade in a relatively tight range around $149-155, with minor dips reflecting beer demand volatility tied to economic uncertainty and Hispanic consumer spending. Despite YTD gains near 12%, shares faced pressure from sector challenges, though steady Modelo and Corona performance supported Q3 beats. Trading volumes remain moderate, indicating contained sentiment shifts in beverages.

WMT Overview and Recent Performance

Walmart Inc. (WMT) operates as a people-led, tech-powered omnichannel retailer with supercenters, discount stores, and e-commerce across 19 countries, serving 270 million weekly customers. In recent market activity, WMT has shown resilience, hovering near $120-126 with YTD returns around 10%, outperforming peers amid retail competition. Strong free cash flow, gross margins at ~25%, and e-commerce growth have bolstered stability, even as shares dipped slightly on broader market pulls. High volumes reflect consistent investor interest in its defensive positioning.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most promising bots—selected by advanced AI for real-time signals, risk management, and sector adaptability—earn a spot in this dynamic section. Stats showcase impressive ranges: annualized returns from +15% to +126%, win rates of 56-89%, profit factors up to 6.11, and low drawdowns relative to gains. Bots target themes like consumer staples (including WMT), volatility hedging, and growth sectors with multi-agent intelligence. Explore these high-performing tools to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

EL’s prestige beauty model relies on luxury skincare and fragrances, vulnerable to discretionary spending cuts, contrasting STZ’s premium beer focus (e.g., Modelo) with steadier essential-like demand but exposure to economic slowdowns among key demographics. WMT’s massive retail scale offers broad grocery and essentials diversification, driving lower beta (0.66) versus EL (1.11). Recent momentum favors WMT’s stability over EL’s volatility and STZ’s flat range. Risks include EL’s high debt/equity (1.82) and merger uncertainty, STZ’s demand softness, and WMT’s competitive e-commerce pressures. Valuation sensitivity shows WMT at premium P/E (~35x) justified by ROE (24%), while EL appears cheaper but riskier. Sentiment leans defensive toward retail over cyclicals.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors WMT due to its superior trend consistency, lower volatility, and resilient catalysts in omnichannel retail amid uncertain conditions. Relative positioning and stability outperform EL’s downside risks and STZ’s muted momentum, suggesting higher probability of positive returns in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2026
Stock price -- (EL: $76.20STZ: $162.28WMT: $127.50)
Brand notoriety: STZ and WMT are notable and EL is not notable
EL represents the Household/Personal Care industry, STZ is part of the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry, and WMT is in the Discount Stores industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EL: 99%, STZ: 119%, WMT: 115%
Market capitalization -- EL: $27.56B, STZ: $28.14B, WMT: $1.02T
EL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $27.56B. STZ’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $28.14B. WMT [@Discount Stores] has a market capitalization of $1.02T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $341.47B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $146.99B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $1.02T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $19.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $25.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $117.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and WMT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMT is a better buy in the long-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than EL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMT’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WMT is a better buy in the short-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than EL.

Price Growth

EL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +4.86% price change this week, while STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -2.33% , and WMT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

EL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

WMT is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.04% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

@Discount Stores (+2.34% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMT($1.02T) has a higher market cap than STZ($28.1B) and EL($27.6B). EL has higher P/E ratio than WMT and STZ: EL (147.80) vs WMT (46.70) and STZ (16.89). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 18.394 vs. WMT (14.677) and EL (-27.006). WMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.5B vs. STZ (2.47B) and EL (1.39B). WMT has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. EL (3.08B) and STZ (152M). EL has less debt than STZ and WMT: EL (9.39B) vs STZ (10.7B) and WMT (67.1B). WMT has higher revenues than EL and STZ: WMT (713B) vs EL (14.7B) and STZ (9.38B).
ELSTZWMT
Capitalization27.6B28.1B1.02T
EBITDA1.39B2.47B46.5B
Gain YTD-27.00618.39414.677
P/E Ratio147.8016.8946.70
Revenue14.7B9.38B713B
Total Cash3.08B152M10.7B
Total Debt9.39B10.7B67.1B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EL vs STZ vs WMT: Fundamental Ratings
EL
STZ
WMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1001006
SMR RATING
1..100
915540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
644948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
367942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
855050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STZ's Valuation (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as EL (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for WMT (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to EL’s and somewhat faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for EL (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew significantly faster than STZ’s and significantly faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's SMR Rating (40) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EL (91) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and somewhat faster than EL’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as STZ (49) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as EL (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to EL’s over the last 12 months.

EL's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as WMT (42) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (79) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that EL's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELSTZWMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THETA.X0.2156360.016237
+8.14%
Theta Network cryptocurrency
SVAL38.840.85
+2.24%
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
CHI11.810.03
+0.25%
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
WBIF32.62N/A
N/A
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
RSBY18.33-0.17
-0.94%
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
-1.20%
SAM - STZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
TAP - STZ
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
BUD - STZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More