Equity LifeStyle Properties (ELS), EPR Properties (EPR), and Realty Income (O) represent distinct niches within the REIT sector: residential communities, experiential assets, and retail properties, respectively. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and income attributes amid interest rate dynamics and economic shifts. Income-oriented investors and traders seeking monthly dividends or sector diversification will find value in evaluating their relative momentum, yields, and growth catalysts in the current environment.
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS) owns and operates approximately 450 manufactured home communities and RV resorts across North America, focusing on affordable housing alternatives. In recent market activity, ELS shares have traded within a 52-week range of $58.15 to $69.00, with a current price around $62.82. Year-to-date gains stand at 4.55%, reflecting steady but moderated momentum. Key influences include Q1 2026 earnings that highlighted strong annual membership rent growth driving same-store NOI expansion, alongside a dividend increase—its 22nd consecutive annual hike—and reaffirmed 2026 guidance. Shareholder approval at the annual meeting further supports positive sentiment, though broader REIT pressures have capped upside.
EPR Properties (EPR) is a specialty REIT investing in experiential properties such as theaters, amusement parks, and educational facilities. Shares recently hover near $55.28, within a 52-week range of $48.11 to $62.08. YTD performance reaches 13.27%, outpacing many finance peers. Recent developments feature the acquisition of six U.S. regional parks from Six Flags, enhancing its experiential portfolio, and a monthly dividend declaration. Portfolio repositioning aims to sustain the attractive 6.46% yield, with an upcoming Q1 2026 earnings call. These catalysts have driven sentiment shifts, countering prior volatility.
Realty Income Corporation (O), dubbed The Monthly Dividend Company, owns over 15,000 retail properties leased to resilient tenants like convenience stores and drugstores. Trading at about $63.81 in a 52-week range of $54.38 to $67.94, it has achieved 15.17% YTD returns, leading the trio. Recent weeks spotlight its 670th consecutive monthly dividend and preparations for Q1 2026 earnings, projecting EPS of $1.10 and $1.5B revenue. While shares have faced short-term market underperformance, long-term stability and acquisition strategies bolster investor confidence amid retail sector resilience.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like trend trading, swing, and multi-agent systems. These bots feature impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, often on 60-minute charts with average trade durations of 1-6 days. While none specifically target REITs like ELS, EPR, or O, their adaptability suits varying market conditions for stocks and ETFs. Explore these bots to align with your trading approach.
ELS, EPR, and O diverge in business models: ELS emphasizes recession-resistant residential assets, EPR experiential venues with higher volatility but growth via acquisitions, and O diversified retail with net lease stability. Growth drivers include EPR's park buys versus organic NOI at ELS and scale at O. Recent momentum favors O and EPR, with EPR's beta (1.01) signaling higher risk than ELS (0.70) or O (0.76). Valuation sensitivity shows EPR's attractive P/E and yield trade-off against O's premium for size. Market sentiment tilts toward income reliability across all, with rate cut prospects aiding leverage.
Tickeron's AI would likely favor Realty Income (O) in the current environment, given its leading YTD performance, substantial market cap for liquidity and stability, low beta, and unparalleled dividend consistency as a catalyst for relative positioning. While EPR offers yield appeal and momentum, O's trend reliability edges it probabilistically higher for balanced REIT exposure.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and O’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and O’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ELS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while EPR (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +4.13% , and O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price fluctuated -1.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.39%.
ELS is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.
EPR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
O is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.56% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-1.12% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| ELS | EPR | O | |
| Capitalization | 12.3B | 4.46B | 58.3B |
| EBITDA | 745M | 575M | 4.91B |
| Gain YTD | 5.581 | 19.454 | 12.856 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.72 | 17.99 | 51.25 |
| Revenue | 1.46B | 681M | 5.88B |
| Total Cash | 18.8M | 68.5M | 374M |
| Total Debt | 3.29B | 3.13B | 30.2B |
ELS | EPR | O | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 81 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 24 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 32 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 67 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 46 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 90 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPR's Valuation (24) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELS (65) and is somewhat better than the same rating for O (73). This means that EPR's stock grew somewhat faster than ELS’s and somewhat faster than O’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for O (65) and is somewhat better than the same rating for ELS (86). This means that EPR's stock grew somewhat faster than O’s and somewhat faster than ELS’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's SMR Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EPR (67) and is somewhat better than the same rating for O (88). This means that ELS's stock grew similarly to EPR’s and somewhat faster than O’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (52) and is in the same range as ELS (57). This means that EPR's stock grew similarly to O’s and similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.
O's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (54) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EPR (90). This means that O's stock grew similarly to ELS’s and somewhat faster than EPR’s over the last 12 months.
| ELS | EPR | O | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 3 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 48% | 10 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 36% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BDRY | 13.29 | 0.64 | +5.06% |
| Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | |||
| CSNR | 37.66 | 0.12 | +0.32% |
| Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF | |||
| ASA | 70.66 | 0.11 | +0.16% |
| ASA Gold AND Precious Metals Limited | |||
| OAKG | 24.97 | -0.07 | -0.27% |
| Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF | |||
| FEMS | 47.80 | -0.67 | -1.38% |
| First Trust Emerg Mkts SC AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELS has been closely correlated with SUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELS jumps, then SUI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELS | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| SUI - ELS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| CUBE - ELS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FCPT - ELS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| ADC - ELS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| DBRG - ELS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPR has been closely correlated with EPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPR jumps, then EPRT could also see price increases.