EME
Price
$913.11
Change
-$16.92 (-1.82%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
40.58B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IESC
Price
$682.20
Change
-$15.01 (-2.15%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.59B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$769.99
Change
-$10.09 (-1.29%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
115.54B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EME or IESC or PWR

Header iconEME vs IESC vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts EME vs IESC vs PWRBanner chart's image
EME vs IESC vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. IES Holdings (IESC) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • PWR leads YTD performance at 82.90%, followed by IESC at 70.02% and EME at 52.71%, driven by infrastructure demand.
  • All three reported strong Q1 2026 earnings beats, with raised guidance: EME revenue up 19.7%, IESC backlog up 62% to $3.9B, PWR backlog at record $48.5B.
  • EME and IESC trade at attractive P/E ratios around 31-35x, while PWR's 106x reflects premium scale and growth.
  • Data center and electrification trends boost sentiment across the board, with robust backlogs signaling multi-year visibility.
  • PWR dominates market cap at $115.8B vs. $41.6B for EME and $13.2B for IESC.
  • Recent momentum favors all, but higher betas (IESC 1.81) indicate greater volatility.

Introduction

This comparison examines EME, IESC, and PWR, three leaders in the engineering and construction sector focused on electrical infrastructure, data centers, and utilities. Operating amid surging demand for electrification, renewable energy, and AI-driven data centers, these stocks have delivered outsized returns. Traders seeking momentum in industrials and investors eyeing long-term infrastructure growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, backlogs, and valuation in the current market environment.

EME Overview and Recent Performance

EME, or EMCOR Group, Inc., provides electrical and mechanical construction, along with facilities services, primarily in the U.S. and U.K. In recent market activity, shares have surged, hitting new highs near $944 amid strong Q1 2026 results: revenue rose 19.7% to $4.63 billion, diluted EPS jumped 30% to $6.84 (beating estimates), and remaining performance obligations hit a record $15.62 billion, up 32.9%. The company raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance to $18.50-$19.25 billion and EPS to $28.25-$29.75. Data center projects and mechanical services have fueled sentiment, with shares up 52.71% YTD and trading at a P/E of 31.35.

IESC Overview and Recent Performance

IESC, or IES Holdings, Inc., designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems for data centers, commercial, residential, and infrastructure markets. Recent weeks saw shares climb to 52-week highs around $677, propelled by fiscal Q2 2026 earnings: revenue increased 17% to $974 million, EPS beat estimates at $5.44, backlog soared 62% to $3.9 billion on data center demand, and adjusted net income rose 26%. Acquisitions like Gulf Island bolstered capacity. With YTD gains of 70.02% and a P/E of 35.29, performance reflects robust commercial and industrial momentum despite residential softness.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

PWR, or Quanta Services, Inc., delivers infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, pipelines, and communications. Shares recently touched 52-week highs near $778 after Q1 2026 results: revenue hit $7.87 billion (up significantly YoY), adjusted EPS of $2.68 beat estimates, and total backlog reached a record $48.5 billion with remaining performance obligations at $26.2 billion. Full-year guidance was substantially raised, citing utility and data center demand. YTD up 82.90% at a P/E of 106.43, the stock benefits from broad sector exposure and scale.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 total bots, curated for current market conditions across sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and AI infrastructure. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70. For instance, bots targeting data centers and industrials show +94% annualized returns with 70-80% win rates. With diverse strategies, timeframes, and tickers—from short-term momentum to long-term trends—users can copy top performers. Explore Tickeron’s hundreds of AI Trading Bots trading thousands of tickers to find strategies suited to today’s volatile environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

All three operate in engineering & construction (Industrials sector), with heavy exposure to electrical infrastructure and data centers, but differ in scale and focus. PWR’s massive $115.8B market cap and $48.5B backlog provide unmatched stability and diversification across utilities, renewables, and pipelines, though its 106x P/E signals premium pricing. EME ($41.6B cap, 31x P/E) emphasizes mechanical/electrical services with $15.6B obligations, balancing growth (19.7% revenue rise) and value. IESC ($13.2B cap, 35x P/E), the smallest, offers explosive momentum via 62% backlog growth to $3.9B, laser-focused on data centers but with higher beta (1.81) and residential risks. Recent catalysts like AI power needs favor all, yet PWR leads in backlog conversion, IESC in relative valuation/growth, and EME in profitability consistency. Trade-offs include PWR’s debt vs. peers’ lower leverage.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors PWR due to its unmatched backlog scale, broadest sector positioning, and consistent trend strength amid infrastructure tailwinds. While IESC shows superior short-term momentum and EME better valuation, PWR’s relative stability and catalysts position it probabilistically higher for sustained outperformance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (EME: $913.11IESC: $682.20PWR: $769.99)
Brand notoriety: EME, IESC and PWR are all not notable
The three companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EME: 87%, IESC: 60%, PWR: 90%
Market capitalization -- EME: $40.58B, IESC: $13.59B, PWR: $115.54B
$EME is valued at $40.58B, while IESC has a market capitalization of $13.59B, and PWR's market capitalization is $115.54B. The market cap for tickers in this @Engineering & Construction ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Engineering & Construction industry is $10.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIESC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EME and IESC are a better buy in the long-term than PWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EME’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EME’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IESC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EME, IESC and PWR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.32% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +3.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-2.94% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($116B) has a higher market cap than EME($40.6B) and IESC($13.6B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than IESC and EME: PWR (105.62) vs IESC (36.38) and EME (30.67). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 82.520 vs. IESC (75.364) and EME (49.416). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. EME (2.02B) and IESC (537M). EME has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. PWR (365M) and IESC (263M). IESC has less debt than EME and PWR: IESC (107M) vs EME (510M) and PWR (6.32B). PWR has higher revenues than EME and IESC: PWR (30.1B) vs EME (17.7B) and IESC (3.63B).
EMEIESCPWR
Capitalization40.6B13.6B116B
EBITDA2.02B537M2.71B
Gain YTD49.41675.36482.520
P/E Ratio30.6736.38105.62
Revenue17.7B3.63B30.1B
Total Cash916M263M365M
Total Debt510M107M6.32B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EME vs IESC vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
EME
IESC
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
842219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
663
SMR RATING
1..100
232260
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
181410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EME's Valuation (77) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (83) and is in the same range as PWR (93). This means that EME's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (6) and is in the same range as IESC (6). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to EME’s and similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (23) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (60). This means that IESC's stock grew similarly to EME’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IESC (36) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EME (39). This means that PWR's stock grew somewhat faster than IESC’s and somewhat faster than EME’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (14) and is in the same range as EME (18). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMEIESCPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IESC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBXL20.74N/A
N/A
Calamos Ladrd Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF
ABCS31.46-0.31
-0.98%
Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF
IZRL30.16-0.37
-1.21%
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
OEF369.36-4.55
-1.22%
iShares S&P 100 ETF
BBSC83.17-1.60
-1.89%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF

EME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EME
1D Price
Change %
EME100%
-1.82%
FIX - EME
79%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
MTZ - EME
70%
Closely correlated
-4.57%
MYRG - EME
69%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
IESC - EME
67%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
PWR - EME
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-1.29%
MTZ - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-4.57%
MYRG - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
FIX - PWR
76%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
IESC - PWR
67%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
EME - PWR
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More