FN
Price
$662.13
Change
+$43.87 (+7.10%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
23.72B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INTC
Price
$62.38
Change
+$0.66 (+1.07%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
313.21B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KLAC
Price
$1737.28
Change
+$10.02 (+0.58%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
227.72B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN or INTC or KLAC

Header iconFN vs INTC vs KLAC Comparison
Open Charts FN vs INTC vs KLACBanner chart's image
FN vs INTC vs KLAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fabrinet (FN) vs. Intel (INTC) vs. KLA Corporation (KLAC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FN has shown robust year-to-date gains of around 9%, driven by AI optical demand, but trades at a premium P/E of 48.5x amid recent volatility.
  • INTC delivered strong YTD performance near 18%, bolstered by data center and AI momentum, yet faces profitability challenges with negative EPS.
  • KLAC leads with 23% YTD returns, supported by semiconductor inspection demand and capital returns like a $20B buyback, at a P/E of 43.6x.
  • All three benefit from semiconductor and AI trends, but KLAC exhibits superior stability and analyst favor with "Buy" ratings.
  • Recent market activity highlights contrasts: FN up 128% over 1 year, INTC 84%, and KLAC 111%.
  • Valuation sensitivity favors KLAC's consistent profitability over INTC's recovery path.

Introduction

This comparison examines FN, a precision optical manufacturer; INTC, a semiconductor giant; and KLAC, a leader in process control equipment—all tied to the semiconductor ecosystem. Amid surging AI infrastructure demand and chip production investments, these stocks offer insights into supply chain dynamics, manufacturing, and yield optimization. Traders seeking momentum in tech hardware and long-term investors eyeing sector growth will find value in their relative performance, valuation, and market positioning in recent market activity.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN), headquartered in the Cayman Islands, provides advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing services for OEMs in data centers, telecom, and medical sectors. In recent weeks, FN shares experienced volatility, dropping 6% in a session amid profit-taking after a 25% monthly run-up, yet holding year-to-date gains near 9% and 128% over the past year. Key drivers include accelerating datacenter interconnect revenues and AI optical demand, with Q2 revenue beating estimates at $1.13B (up 36% YoY). Analyst targets average $582, signaling optimism, though concerns over AI dependency and valuation temper sentiment. Market cap stands at $18B with a trailing P/E of 48.5x.

INTC Overview and Recent Performance

Intel (INTC), based in Santa Clara, designs and manufactures semiconductors across client, data center, and foundry segments. Recent market activity saw INTC decline 5% in a day, yet it boasts YTD returns around 18% and 84% over one year, outperforming broader indices. Momentum stems from data center/AI product gains (DCAI up 9%) and foundry progress, despite CCG softness. With a $219B market cap and forward P/E near 88x amid negative trailing EPS, valuation reflects turnaround bets. Analysts rate "Hold" with a $47 target, influenced by manufacturing investments and competitive pressures.

KLAC Overview and Recent Performance

KLA Corporation (KLAC), from Milpitas, California, specializes in process control and yield management for semiconductors. In recent weeks, KLAC dipped 0.85% but leads YTD at 23%, with 111% one-year gains, fueled by AI chip demand. Highlights include a $20B buyback expansion and dividend hike to $2.30, affirming cash flow strength. Q2 results beat on chip tool orders, with $197B enterprise value and P/E of 43.6x. "Buy" consensus targets $1,676, driven by advanced node exposure, though trade risks linger.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 350 available agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like technical analysis, price action, and sector-specific plays in semiconductors, aerospace, and leveraged ETFs, delivering annualized returns from 15% to 188%, win rates of 55-89%, and profit factors up to 12. Only the most suitable for current conditions—based on recent performance, risk metrics, and market fit—earn a spot among the 25 featured trending robots. Virtual agents include risk management, while signal agents offer real-time trades. Explore these high-conviction bots to enhance your strategy in volatile markets like semiconductors.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FN focuses on contract manufacturing with optical expertise, contrasting INTC's integrated design-foundry model and KLAC's inspection tools—key for yield in advanced nodes. Growth drivers diverge: FN rides AI optics (revenue +36% YoY), INTC DCAI/AI catalysts amid foundry ramp, KLAC wafer fab spending. Recent momentum favors KLAC (YTD +23%) over FN (+9%) and INTC (+18%). Risks include FN's customer concentration, INTC's losses, and KLAC's trade exposure. KLAC offers best profitability (P/E 43x vs. FN 48x, INTC N/A); sentiment tilts to KLAC "Buy" ratings.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KLAC due to trend consistency in semiconductor tools, stable profitability, and capital return catalysts like buybacks, positioning it strongly amid AI capex. FN shows high growth potential but elevated valuation risk; INTC lags on earnings recovery. Probabilistic edge to KLAC for relative stability.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (FN: $662.13INTC: $62.38KLAC: $1737.28)
Brand notoriety: INTC and KLAC are notable and FN is not notable
FN represents the Electronic Components industry, INTC is part of the Semiconductors industry, and KLAC is in the Electronic Production Equipment industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 172%, INTC: 135%, KLAC: 89%
Market capitalization -- FN: $23.72B, INTC: $313.21B, KLAC: $227.72B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $23.72B. INTC’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $313.21B. KLAC [@Electronic Production Equipment] has a market capitalization of $227.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $173.04B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.58T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $554.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $10.7B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $113.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $46.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and KLAC’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN and KLAC are a better buy in the long-term than INTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KLAC’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KLAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLAC is a better buy in the short-term than FN, which in turn is a better option than INTC.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +18.67% price change this week, while INTC (@Semiconductors) price change was +23.82% , and KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated +14.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +6.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +13.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

INTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

KLAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+6.72% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Semiconductors (+6.73% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (+13.41% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTC($313B) has a higher market cap than KLAC($228B) and FN($23.7B). INTC has higher P/E ratio than FN and KLAC: INTC (904.17) vs FN (63.48) and KLAC (50.58). INTC YTD gains are higher at: 69.051 vs. FN (45.434) and KLAC (43.162). INTC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.4B vs. KLAC (5.91B) and FN (466M). INTC has more cash in the bank: 37.4B vs. KLAC (5.21B) and FN (961M). FN has less debt than KLAC and INTC: FN (4.89M) vs KLAC (6.11B) and INTC (46.6B). INTC has higher revenues than KLAC and FN: INTC (52.9B) vs KLAC (12.7B) and FN (3.89B).
FNINTCKLAC
Capitalization23.7B313B228B
EBITDA466M14.4B5.91B
Gain YTD45.43469.05143.162
P/E Ratio63.48904.1750.58
Revenue3.89B52.9B12.7B
Total Cash961M37.4B5.21B
Total Debt4.89M46.6B6.11B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs INTC vs KLAC: Fundamental Ratings
FN
INTC
KLAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
303027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4916
SMR RATING
1..100
468913
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3624
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68615
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
509050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (74) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as INTC (96) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (91) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (46) in the Electronic Components industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (89) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

INTC's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (36) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that INTC's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (15) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (86) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNINTCKLAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KLAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTIP50.050.02
+0.04%
Vanguard Short-Term Infl-Prot Secs ETF
APRH24.89-0.03
-0.10%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr
HYSD20.17-0.05
-0.25%
Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
FDD18.75-0.06
-0.32%
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund
MGMT46.80-0.17
-0.36%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF

INTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTC
1D Price
Change %
INTC100%
+1.07%
LRCX - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
AMAT - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
KLIC - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
FORM - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
VECO - INTC
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
More

KLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLAC
1D Price
Change %
KLAC100%
+0.58%
LRCX - KLAC
89%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
AMAT - KLAC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
NVMI - KLAC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
ASML - KLAC
79%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
ADI - KLAC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More