Advertisement
FN or KLAC or NVDA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fabrinet (FN) vs. KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FN, KLAC, and NVDA operate in the semiconductor and AI supply chain, with recent volatility tied to sector-wide pressures but strong underlying AI demand.
- FN benefits from HPC ramp-up to over $150M quarterly and optical growth in datacenters, driving 36% YoY revenue increase in recent quarter.
- KLAC leads in process control for AI chips, posting record $3.3B revenue with advanced packaging up significantly amid AI node investments.
- NVDA dominates AI infrastructure with $62.3B data center revenue, up 75% YoY, underscoring ecosystem strength but high valuation sensitivity.
- All three show YTD gains earlier in 2026 but recent pullbacks; relative performance favors supply chain plays amid broader momentum shifts.
- AI-driven catalysts persist across telecom/DCI, inspection/metrology, and compute, positioning them for relative outperformance in volatile markets.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FN, KLAC, and NVDA, key players in the semiconductor ecosystem fueling AI and data center expansion. FN specializes in precision optical manufacturing, KLAC in process control and yield management, and NVDA in accelerated computing platforms. Traders seeking exposure to AI infrastructure growth, from chip design to fabrication and optics, will find value in analyzing their relative performance, momentum, and sector interdependencies. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in volatility, growth trajectories, and positioning amid surging data center investments.
FN Overview and Recent Performance
FN, or Fabrinet, provides advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing services for OEMs in optical communications, data centers, and high-performance computing. In recent market activity, the stock experienced volatility, declining over 10% in a session amid broader sector pressures but maintaining strong fundamentals. Recent quarters showed record revenue of $1.13 billion, up 36% year-over-year, driven by telecom growth up 66%, datacenter interconnect (DCI) modules up 42%, and emerging high-performance computing (HPC) contributions reaching $85.6 million. Sentiment has been bolstered by easing datacom supply constraints and guidance for $1.15-$1.20 billion in the next quarter, reflecting sustained AI-related optical demand and HPC ramp-up toward $150 million quarterly run-rate. Year-to-date gains earlier in 2026 underscore its role in AI networking, though short-term pullbacks tie to market rotations.
KLAC Overview and Recent Performance
KLAC, or KLA Corporation, designs process control and yield management solutions critical for semiconductor fabrication, including inspection and metrology for advanced nodes. Recent performance reflects sector headwinds, with shares down nearly 6% in a day, yet fundamentals remain robust. The company reported record Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue of $3.30 billion, up 7% year-over-year, and non-GAAP EPS of $8.85, beating estimates amid AI-driven demand for process tools. Advanced packaging surged, supporting heterogeneous integration for AI chips, with guidance pointing to mid-teens growth. Sentiment benefits from dominant market share (55-80%) in key inspection areas and investments in 2nm technologies, though geopolitical tensions have pressured pricing. Broader momentum shows outperformance versus peers in recent weeks, tied to essential role in AI chip yields.
NVDA Overview and Recent Performance
NVDA, or NVIDIA Corporation, leads in GPUs and AI infrastructure, powering data centers with accelerated computing platforms. Recent trading saw a 3% dip amid pullbacks, but Q4 fiscal 2026 delivered record $68.1 billion revenue, up 73% year-over-year, with data center at $62.3 billion, surging 75% on Blackwell demand. Full-year revenue hit $215.9 billion, up 65%, driven by AI adoption across hyperscalers and enterprises. Performance reflects high beta to AI sentiment, with YTD softness after prior gains, influenced by valuation concerns and supply chain dynamics. Catalysts include sustained platform shifts to accelerated computing, though competition and export restrictions add risks. Relative stability stems from ecosystem dominance.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available, each trading thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots excel in volatility, with annualized returns ranging from +32% to +215%, win rates up to 95%, and profit factors exceeding 25 in sectors like semiconductors (e.g., SOXL bot at +113% annualized, 70% win rate), aerospace, and mining. Selected via AI analysis for superior performance, they include short-term (5-60 min) ML agents and swing traders targeting ETFs, single stocks, or multi-ticker portfolios. Traders can filter by volatility and subscribe for automated signals. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to current conditions and enhance stock comparison insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FN, KLAC, and NVDA share AI/semiconductor exposure but differ in business models: FN as contract manufacturer emphasizes optical/HPC scaling with lower barriers but customer concentration risks; KLAC holds process control monopoly-like shares, yielding high margins (60%+ gross) amid fab complexity; NVDA drives ecosystem via compute platforms, boasting unmatched growth but elevated P/E (~36) versus peers. Recent momentum favors FN's 25% monthly surge on HPC, while all face sector risks like supply chains and geopolitics. KLAC offers stability in inspection for advanced nodes; NVDA leads catalysts but trades at premium. Valuation sensitivity highest for NVDA; sentiment tilts to supply chain resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FN for its consistent trend in HPC/datacenter ramp-up, relative stability versus high-beta NVDA, and undervaluation compared to KLAC's premium. Observable factors like 36% revenue growth, easing constraints, and positioning in AI optics suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance amid sector volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKLAC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and NVDA’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- NVDA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLAC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVDA’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KLAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NVDA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +18.67% price change this week, while KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +14.53% , and NVDA (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +6.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +6.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +13.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.
KLAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
NVDA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+6.72% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Electronic Production Equipment (+13.41% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+6.73% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| FN | KLAC | NVDA | |
| Capitalization | 23.7B | 228B | 4.58T |
| EBITDA | 466M | 5.91B | 145B |
| Gain YTD | 45.434 | 43.162 | 1.148 |
| P/E Ratio | 63.48 | 50.58 | 38.50 |
| Revenue | 3.89B | 12.7B | 216B |
| Total Cash | 961M | 5.21B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 4.89M | 6.11B | 11B |
FN | KLAC | NVDA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 27 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 13 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 4 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 15 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FN's Valuation (74) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as NVDA (77) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as KLAC (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to NVDA’s and similarly to KLAC’s over the last 12 months.
FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as NVDA (10) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and similarly to NVDA’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as NVDA (13) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (46) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew similarly to NVDA’s and somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FN (36) in the Electronic Components industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NVDA (49) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew similarly to FN’s and somewhat faster than NVDA’s over the last 12 months.
FN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KLAC (15) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NVDA (56) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and somewhat faster than NVDA’s over the last 12 months.
| FN | KLAC | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 68% | 13 days ago 62% | 13 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VTIP | 50.05 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Vanguard Short-Term Infl-Prot Secs ETF | |||
| APRH | 24.89 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Apr | |||
| HYSD | 20.17 | -0.05 | -0.25% |
| Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF | |||
| FDD | 18.75 | -0.06 | -0.32% |
| First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund | |||
| MGMT | 46.80 | -0.17 | -0.36% |
| Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF | |||
FN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 89% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| NVMI - KLAC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||