FN
Price
$700.01
Change
+$10.12 (+1.47%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
25.08B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRVL
Price
$147.84
Change
+$8.15 (+5.83%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
129.28B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTSI
Price
$281.08
Change
+$4.11 (+1.48%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
21.08B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN or MRVL or MTSI

Header iconFN vs MRVL vs MTSI Comparison
Open Charts FN vs MRVL vs MTSIBanner chart's image
FN vs MRVL vs MTSI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fabrinet (FN) vs. Marvell Technology (MRVL) vs. MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FN surged over 25% in recent weeks on strong Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings and HPC growth, though recent profit-taking led to volatility.
  • MRVL jumped 18% following robust Q4 fiscal 2026 results with data center revenue at $1.65B, up 21% YoY, fueled by AI demand.
  • MTSI reported Q1 fiscal 2026 revenue of $271.6M, up 24.5% YoY, driven by record industrial & defense and data center growth.
  • All three stocks benefit from AI, data center, and optical interconnect trends, with FN as a key manufacturer, MRVL in custom chips, and MTSI in analog semis.
  • Recent momentum favors MRVL on earnings beat and raised guidance, while FN shows high growth potential amid datacom/HPC scaling.
  • Valuations reflect sector strength, but risks include supply constraints and market volatility in semiconductors.

Introduction

This comparison examines FN, MRVL, and MTSI, three semiconductor-adjacent firms thriving amid AI-driven data center expansion and optical networking demands. Fabrinet provides precision manufacturing for optical components, Marvell designs data infrastructure chips, and MACOM delivers analog RF solutions. Traders seeking exposure to high-growth tech subsectors like high-performance computing (HPC) and interconnects, or investors tracking relative performance in volatile markets, will find value in their contrasting business models, recent earnings momentum, and sector positioning. This analysis draws on recent financial results and market data to highlight key differences in growth drivers and risks.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN) is a leading contract manufacturer specializing in advanced optical packaging, electro-mechanical, and electronic services for OEMs in communications, data centers, and industrial markets. Headquartered in the Cayman Islands with operations across North America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, the company supports complex products like optical modules and subsystems.

In recent market activity, FN shares jumped nearly 25% in a month, propelled by accelerating telecom/datacenter interconnect (DCI) revenues and high-performance computing (HPC) scaling. Q2 fiscal 2026 results showed record revenue of $1.13B, up 36% YoY, and non-GAAP EPS of $3.36, beating estimates. HPC contributed $85.6M, with management guiding for double-digit Q3 growth and programs exceeding $150M quarterly soon. Sentiment has been buoyed by easing datacom constraints and capacity expansions, though a recent 10% pullback reflects profit-taking after a 185% one-year rally.

MRVL Overview and Recent Performance

Marvell Technology (MRVL) designs data infrastructure semiconductors, including Ethernet solutions, processors, and interconnect products like DSPs and silicon photonics for data centers, networking, and storage. A fabless chipmaker headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, it serves AI, carrier, enterprise, and automotive markets with system-on-chip architectures.

Recent weeks saw MRVL shares surge 18% post-Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings, with revenue of $2.22B (up 22% YoY) and data center at $1.65B (up 21%). Adjusted EPS of $0.80 topped forecasts, alongside raised Q1 guidance. AI demand for custom chips and networking fueled optimism, with fiscal 2026 revenue hitting $8.2B (up 42% YoY). Management highlighted record orders and multi-year AI growth, though shares remain below peaks amid broader sector volatility.

MTSI Overview and Recent Performance

MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI) provides analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, millimeter-wave, and photonic applications in telecom, industrial/defense, and data centers. Based in Lowell, Massachusetts, it offers amplifiers, switches, and subsystems for base stations, radar, and optical networks, serving diverse end-markets globally.

MTSI delivered Q1 fiscal 2026 revenue of $271.6M, up 24.5% YoY and 4% sequentially, with adjusted EPS of $1.02 beating expectations. Record industrial & defense and data center growth drove results, alongside a strong 1.3:1 book-to-bill ratio. Q2 guidance projects $281-289M revenue. Shares hit 52-week highs amid AI optics progress, though recent dips reflect broader market pressures after a 105% one-year gain.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only bots demonstrating superior risk-adjusted returns, high win rates (often 70-90%), and adaptability to volatility earn a spot in this curated section—such as those delivering +159% annualized returns on leveraged ETFs or +124% in aerospace/defense with low drawdowns. Stats highlight annualized gains from +33% to +171% over 30 days, profit factors above 2.0, and equity curves showing consistent compounding. These bots employ pattern recognition, trend prediction, and multi-agent models for stocks like those in semiconductors. Explore Trending AI Robots to deploy proven performers tailored to current environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FN, MRVL, and MTSI overlap in AI/data center exposure but differ in models: FN's manufacturing scales with OEM demand (e.g., optical/HPC), offering leverage to volume growth; MRVL's fabless design yields higher margins on custom AI chips/interconnects; MTSI focuses on analog components for diversified RF/defense/telecom. Growth drivers include datacom (FN/MTSI) vs. custom AI (MRVL). Recent momentum: MRVL's 18% post-earnings pop outpaces FN's pullback and MTSI's steady climb. Risks: FN faces supply/execution hurdles; MRVL cyclicality in semis; MTSI debt sensitivity. All trade at premiums on forward multiples due to AI tailwinds, with MRVL most sentiment-driven, FN valuation-sensitive to HPC ramps, and MTSI balanced by defense stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MRVL based on trend consistency in data center/AI catalysts, recent earnings outperformance, and raised guidance signaling durable demand. Its relative positioning in custom chips offers probabilistic edge over FN's manufacturing volatility and MTSI's narrower focus, though all benefit from sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (FN: $700.01MRVL: $147.84MTSI: $281.08)
Brand notoriety: FN and MTSI are not notable and MRVL is notable
MRVL and MTSI are part of the Semiconductors industry, and FN is in the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 80%, MRVL: 169%, MTSI: 80%
Market capitalization -- FN: $25.08B, MRVL: $129.28B, MTSI: $21.08B
$MRVL [@Semiconductors] is valued at $129.28B. $MTSI’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $21.08B. $FN [@Electronic Components] has a market capitalization of $ $25.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.91T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $ $187.87B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $122.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $ $11.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRVL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MTSI’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRVL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN and MRVL are a better buy in the long-term than MTSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRVL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and MTSI’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRVL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTSI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN and MTSI are a better buy in the short-term than MRVL.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while MRVL (@Semiconductors) price change was +12.60% , and MTSI (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +6.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.26%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

MRVL is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.

MTSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+4.16% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Semiconductors (+10.22% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRVL($129B) has a higher market cap than FN($25.1B) and MTSI($21.1B). MTSI has higher P/E ratio than FN and MRVL: MTSI (127.19) vs FN (67.12) and MRVL (48.16). MRVL YTD gains are higher at: 74.183 vs. MTSI (64.106) and FN (53.754). MRVL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.54B vs. FN (466M) and MTSI (259M). MRVL has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. FN (961M) and MTSI (768M). FN has less debt than MTSI and MRVL: FN (4.89M) vs MTSI (531M) and MRVL (4.79B). MRVL has higher revenues than FN and MTSI: MRVL (8.2B) vs FN (3.89B) and MTSI (1.02B).
FNMRVLMTSI
Capitalization25.1B129B21.1B
EBITDA466M4.54B259M
Gain YTD53.75474.18364.106
P/E Ratio67.1248.16127.19
Revenue3.89B8.2B1.02B
Total Cash961M2.64B768M
Total Debt4.89M4.79B531M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs MRVL vs MTSI: Fundamental Ratings
FN
MRVL
MTSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
313329
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4397
SMR RATING
1..100
464559
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
353536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRVL's Valuation (73) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (74) in the Electronic Components industry, and is in the same range as MTSI (83) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew similarly to FN’s and similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MTSI (7) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVL (39) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to MTSI’s and somewhat faster than MRVL’s over the last 12 months.

MRVL's SMR Rating (45) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (46) in the Electronic Components industry, and is in the same range as MTSI (59) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew similarly to FN’s and similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

MRVL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (35) in the Electronic Components industry, and is in the same range as MTSI (36) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew similarly to FN’s and similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MRVL (27) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (45) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and somewhat faster than MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNMRVLMTSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRVL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBIC25.910.01
+0.06%
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term Tips ETF
STOT47.230.01
+0.02%
State Street®DoubleLine®ShrtDurTRTactETF
PSQO20.66N/A
N/A
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF
COTG14.84-0.06
-0.40%
Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF
OUNZ46.29-0.40
-0.86%
VanEck Merk Gold Trust

MTSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSI has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTSI jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTSI
1D Price
Change %
MTSI100%
+1.48%
KLAC - MTSI
70%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
LRCX - MTSI
70%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
SITM - MTSI
69%
Closely correlated
+4.86%
VECO - MTSI
68%
Closely correlated
+8.75%
AMKR - MTSI
68%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
More