FN
Price
$618.26
Change
+$8.08 (+1.32%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
22.15B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRVL
Price
$119.93
Change
+$5.48 (+4.79%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
104.87B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$9.42
Change
-$0.13 (-1.36%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.17B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN or MRVL or NVTS

Header iconFN vs MRVL vs NVTS Comparison
Open Charts FN vs MRVL vs NVTSBanner chart's image
FN vs MRVL vs NVTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fabrinet (FN) vs. Marvell Technology (MRVL) vs. Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FN has delivered strong recent performance with shares up over 120% in the past year, driven by AI data center optics demand and record Q2 fiscal 2026 revenues of $1.13 billion.
  • MRVL reported record fiscal 2026 revenue of $8.2 billion, up 42% year-over-year, fueled by data center growth, though shares lag with modest YTD gains around 8%.
  • NVTS shows high volatility with YTD returns near 50% and over 300% in the past year, boosted by new 1200V SiC launches targeting AI infrastructure, but remains unprofitable.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven demand in semiconductors and optics, with FN and MRVL demonstrating profitability and scale, while NVTS offers growth potential amid a strategic pivot.
  • Recent momentum favors FN for stability, but NVTS leads in relative upside from product announcements.

Introduction

This comparison examines FN (Fabrinet), MRVL (Marvell Technology), and NVTS (Navitas Semiconductor), three semiconductor-adjacent firms capitalizing on AI data center expansion. Fabrinet provides precision manufacturing for optics, Marvell delivers data infrastructure chips, and Navitas focuses on power semiconductors like GaN and SiC. Traders seeking exposure to AI infrastructure growth and investors tracking relative performance in tech will find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning amid evolving sector dynamics.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet, a Cayman Islands-based provider of advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing services, supports OEMs in optical communications, industrial lasers, and data centers. In recent market activity, FN shares have surged, with over 120% gains in the past year and YTD returns around 13%, trading near $513 with a market cap of approximately $18 billion. Key drivers include robust Q2 fiscal 2026 results, with revenues of $1.13 billion (up 36% year-over-year) and non-GAAP EPS of $3.36, beating estimates. Strength in telecom, datacom, and high-performance computing (HPC) segments, alongside upcoming 800ZR optics ramps, has boosted sentiment. Trading at a trailing P/E of about 49, the stock reflects premium valuation tied to AI capacity expansions, though supply chain dependencies pose risks.

MRVL Overview and Recent Performance

Marvell Technology designs data infrastructure semiconductors, including ethernet solutions, interconnects, and custom AI silicon for data centers and networking. Recent weeks saw MRVL shares rise post-Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings, with record annual revenue of $8.2 billion (up 42% year-over-year) and non-GAAP EPS of $2.84. Data center revenue exceeded $6 billion, driven by hyperscaler demand. Shares trade around $92, with a market cap near $80 billion, YTD gains of 8%, and 30% over the past year. Trading at a trailing P/E of 29, performance reflects AI connectivity strength but faces competition in custom silicon. Positive Q1 guidance for accelerating growth supports sentiment, tempered by automotive/industrial declines.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor develops GaN and SiC power semiconductors for AI data centers, EVs, and renewables. In recent market activity, NVTS shares have been volatile, up nearly 50% YTD and over 300% in the past year, trading near $10 with a $2.3 billion market cap. Launches of 1200V SiC packages targeting AI infrastructure drove sharp gains, alongside a pivot to high-power markets under "Navitas 2.0." Despite revenue contraction to $46 million last year, design wins with hyperscalers fuel optimism. Lacking profitability (negative P/E), high beta of 3.2 underscores risk, with sentiment shifting on execution in mobile-to-AI transition.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 total bots, meticulously curated by AI analysis for superior performance in current market conditions. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies like trend following, volatility exploitation, and hedging, with timeframes from 5-minute to 60-minute intervals. Standout stats include annualized returns from +17% to over +200%, win rates of 53% to 95%, and profit factors up to 25.8. Semiconductor-focused bots, such as those on SOXL and MPWR, have delivered +85% to +110% annualized returns with 60-74% win rates. Ideal for varied trading styles, they offer real-time signals for copy trading. Explore these high-performing bots tailored to today’s volatility at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FN, MRVL, and NVTS share AI data center exposure but differ in models: Fabrinet’s contract manufacturing emphasizes optics precision (revenue growth ~36% YoY), Marvell’s fabless design targets interconnects and custom chips (42% FY26 growth), and Navitas specializes in power efficiency via GaN/SiC (transitioning from mobile). Growth drivers hinge on hyperscaler ramps, with FN and MRVL showing earnings stability versus NVTS’s pre-profit scalability. Recent momentum peaks for FN (128% 1Y return), NVTS volatile (326% 1Y), MRVL steady (30% 1Y). Risks include FN’s client concentration, MRVL’s sector cyclicality, and NVTS’s execution amid losses. Valuations reflect this: FN at 49x P/E, MRVL 29x, NVTS N/A with high P/S. Sentiment favors established players, but NVTS offers higher-beta trade-offs in power-hungry AI setups.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FN due to its consistent trend strength, earnings beats, and balanced AI optics exposure amid recent highs and positive guidance. Observable factors like superior 1-year relative performance and HPC catalysts position it ahead probabilistically over MRVL’s scale and NVTS’s volatility, though all ride sector tailwinds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (FN: $618.26MRVL: $119.93NVTS: $9.42)
Brand notoriety: FN and NVTS are not notable and MRVL is notable
MRVL and NVTS are part of the Semiconductors industry, and FN is in the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 133%, MRVL: 231%, NVTS: 92%
Market capitalization -- FN: $22.15B, MRVL: $104.87B, NVTS: $2.17B
$MRVL [@Semiconductors] is valued at $104.87B. $NVTS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $2.17B. $FN [@Electronic Components] has a market capitalization of $ $22.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.47T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $ $169.27B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $110.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $ $10.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRVL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NVTS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRVL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN and MRVL are a better buy in the long-term than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRVL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVTS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRVL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN and MRVL are a better buy in the short-term than NVTS.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +10.81% price change this week, while MRVL (@Semiconductors) price change was +11.97% , and NVTS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +5.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

MRVL is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+5.83% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRVL($105B) has a higher market cap than FN($22.1B) and NVTS($2.17B). FN has higher P/E ratio than MRVL and NVTS: FN (59.28) vs MRVL (39.07) and NVTS (). MRVL YTD gains are higher at: 41.229 vs. FN (35.798) and NVTS (31.933). MRVL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.36B vs. FN (466M) and NVTS (-67.33M). MRVL has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. FN (961M) and NVTS (237M). FN has less debt than NVTS and MRVL: FN (4.89M) vs NVTS (6.47M) and MRVL (4.78B). MRVL has higher revenues than FN and NVTS: MRVL (7.79B) vs FN (3.89B) and NVTS (45.9M).
FNMRVLNVTS
Capitalization22.1B105B2.17B
EBITDA466M4.36B-67.33M
Gain YTD35.79841.22931.933
P/E Ratio59.2839.07N/A
Revenue3.89B7.79B45.9M
Total Cash961M2.72B237M
Total Debt4.89M4.78B6.47M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs MRVL: Fundamental Ratings
FN
MRVL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3027
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
549
SMR RATING
1..100
4647
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
839
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRVL's Valuation (68) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (73) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MRVL’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVL (49) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRVL’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MRVL (47) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to MRVL’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MRVL (37) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to MRVL’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MRVL (39) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to MRVL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNMRVLNVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRVL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYW193.640.54
+0.28%
iShares US Technology ETF
MOTG38.690.05
+0.14%
VanEck Morningstar Glb Wd Mt ETF
BKHY47.600.04
+0.08%
BNY Mellon High Yield ETF
IQDG42.50-0.17
-0.40%
WisdomTree International Qual Div Gr ETF
ORR37.58-0.54
-1.42%
Militia Long/Short Equity ETF

MRVL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRVL has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRVL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRVL
1D Price
Change %
MRVL100%
+4.79%
LRCX - MRVL
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
ENTG - MRVL
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
TOELY - MRVL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
KLAC - MRVL
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
KLIC - MRVL
61%
Loosely correlated
+6.14%
More

NVTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVTS
1D Price
Change %
NVTS100%
-1.36%
IFNNY - NVTS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
TOELY - NVTS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
PENG - NVTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
AAOI - NVTS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
COHU - NVTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
More