This comparison examines FNV, GOLD, and WPM, three prominent players in the precious metals space. FNV and WPM focus on streaming and royalties, while GOLD is a major gold producer. Investors seeking exposure to gold and silver amid geopolitical tensions and inflation concerns may find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and relative positioning. Traders monitoring sector rotations will appreciate insights into how these stocks respond to gold price fluctuations and market sentiment shifts.
Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is a leading precious metals royalty and streaming company with a diversified portfolio spanning gold, silver, platinum, and energy royalties from over 400 assets worldwide. This model generates revenue through fixed payments for metal streams without direct mining costs, offering high operating margins. In recent market activity, FNV shares have traded around $226, reflecting year-to-date gains of over 11% but pulling back from highs amid gold's correction. The company's record Q4 2025 revenue of $597.3 million, up 86% year-over-year, bolstered sentiment, driven by strong production from key assets. Recent weeks saw moderated gains as gold prices softened, yet FNV's stability and dividend appeal sustained investor interest.
Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD), now operating as Barrick Mining Corporation, is one of the world's largest gold producers, with tier-one mines across multiple continents and exposure to copper. Its business involves direct extraction, processing, and sales, exposing it to operational variables like costs and output. Shares have hovered near $42 in recent trading, with year-to-date returns outperforming peers at 17.4%, though recent weeks brought declines tied to gold's pullback from peaks. Sentiment has been influenced by updates on projects like Reko Diq and broader sector dynamics, with production resilience supporting positioning despite higher execution risks compared to streamers.
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) operates a streaming model, providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for the right to purchase metals at fixed low prices, primarily gold and silver from a global portfolio. This low-cost structure delivers strong cash flows. Trading around $126 recently, WPM shares reflect solid 12-month gains of about 54%, though recent market activity showed downside amid gold's softening. Portfolio expansions and high production volumes have driven positive sentiment, with the stock maintaining appeal for its growth profile in a volatile commodity environment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds of agents that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current environments earn a spot in this dynamic section, with over 25 featured out of 351 total bots. These include momentum-driven agents achieving up to 227% annualized returns and win rates of 70–80%, alongside swing and pattern-based approaches tailored to sectors like precious metals. Explore these bots to see real-time performance stats and copy top strategies suited to today's volatility.
FNV, GOLD, and WPM share gold price sensitivity but differ in business models: streamers FNV and WPM emphasize low-capex growth via deals, contrasting GOLD's capital-intensive mining. Growth drivers include new streams for streamers and expansions for the producer. Recent momentum favors WPM's relative outperformance, while FNV offers stability. Risks are lower for streamers (no ops variability) versus GOLD's cost inflation exposure. All trade at elevated P/E ratios (price-to-earnings, around 39x), sensitive to rates, with positive sentiment on gold's long-term outlook amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward FNV for its trend consistency, recent record earnings, and balanced risk-reward in the streaming model. With strong revenue growth and portfolio diversification, it shows resilient positioning relative to peers amid gold's fluctuations, though all remain probabilistic plays tied to commodity trends.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGOLD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and WPM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GOLD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WPM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FNV (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.30% price change this week, while GOLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.79% , and WPM (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated +13.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.21%.
FNV is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
GOLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.06% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| FNV | GOLD | WPM | |
| Capitalization | 45.9B | 1.22B | 65B |
| EBITDA | 1.45B | 102M | 2.4B |
| Gain YTD | 14.528 | 24.241 | 21.643 |
| P/E Ratio | 41.15 | 13.73 | 36.07 |
| Revenue | 1.55B | 15.7B | 2.75B |
| Total Cash | 788M | 152M | 2.17B |
| Total Debt | 82.6M | 812M | 7.66M |
FNV | GOLD | WPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 18 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 49 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 89 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 43 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 99 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 48 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FNV's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (21) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (72). This means that FNV's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (29) and is in the same range as GOLD (49). This means that WPM's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's SMR Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (59) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (89). This means that WPM's stock grew similarly to FNV’s and somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
GOLD's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (44) and is in the same range as FNV (53). This means that GOLD's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.
FNV's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (87) and is in the same range as GOLD (99). This means that FNV's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.
| FNV | GOLD | WPM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | N/A | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 76% | 10 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DVXC | 27.63 | N/A | N/A |
| WEBs Communication Svcs XLC Dfnd Vol ETF | |||
| BRNY | 55.33 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | |||
| ESGG | 223.96 | -0.51 | -0.23% |
| FlexShares STOXX Glbl ESG Select ETF | |||
| VCRB | 76.99 | -0.20 | -0.26% |
| Vanguard Core Bond ETF | |||
| NZUS | 37.88 | -0.16 | -0.42% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA ClmtPrsAlgd ETF | |||