FORM
Price
$126.27
Change
-$1.72 (-1.34%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.84B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INTC
Price
$108.77
Change
-$7.16 (-6.18%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
546.68B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KLIC
Price
$102.04
Change
-$2.05 (-1.97%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.34B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORM or INTC or KLIC

Header iconFORM vs INTC vs KLIC Comparison
Open Charts FORM vs INTC vs KLICBanner chart's image
FORM vs INTC vs KLIC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs. Intel Corporation (INTC) vs. Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FORM has surged over 350% in the past year and nearly 160% YTD, driven by record Q1 revenue of $226M and AI-related probe card demand.
  • INTC leads with 193% YTD gains and a massive $544B market cap, fueled by Q1 revenue of $13.6B and AI CPU recovery.
  • KLIC shows 102% YTD performance with Q1 revenue of $200M, benefiting from advanced packaging trends in semiconductors.
  • All three stocks have hit 52-week highs amid a semiconductor rally, with INTC and FORM exhibiting the strongest momentum in recent market activity.
  • Analyst targets suggest potential upside for FORM ($138 avg.) despite trading above consensus, while INTC ($79 avg.) appears stretched at current levels.
  • Semiconductor equipment peers like FORM and KLIC show higher relative growth but face cyclical risks compared to INTC's scale.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines FORM, INTC, and KLIC, three key players in the semiconductor ecosystem amid a robust sector rally. FORM and KLIC provide essential testing and assembly equipment, while INTC is a leading chip designer and foundry. Traders seeking exposure to AI-driven demand, memory recovery, and advanced packaging will find value in analyzing their relative performance, momentum, and market positioning. With the sector projected for strong growth, this analysis highlights contrasts in scale, catalysts, and risks for informed decision-making in the current environment.

FORM Overview and Recent Performance

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) (NASDAQ: FORM) specializes in probe cards, analytical probes, probe stations, thermal, and cryogenic systems for semiconductor testing across the product lifecycle. Headquartered in Livermore, California, it serves major chipmakers in DRAM (dynamic random-access memory), NAND flash, and AI processors.

In recent market activity, FORM shares have delivered explosive gains, up nearly 160% YTD and over 350% in the past year, trading around $145 with a $11.3B market cap. The stock hit a 52-week high of $159 amid a semiconductor rally. Q1 2026 results showed record revenue of $226M (up 32% YoY), beating estimates, with EPS of $0.56 and gross margins expanding 510 basis points to 49%. Strong Asia demand, particularly for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) probe cards tied to AI, has boosted sentiment. Analysts raised targets to $155, maintaining a Hold rating, though shares trade above average targets, reflecting premium valuation sensitivity.

INTC Overview and Recent Performance

Intel Corporation (INTC) (NASDAQ: INTC) is a global leader in designing, manufacturing, and selling processors, data center chips, and foundry services. Operating through Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI (DCAI), and Intel Foundry segments, it powers PCs, servers, AI accelerators, and edge computing from its Santa Clara, California headquarters.

Recent weeks have seen INTC shares soar 193% YTD and over 400% annually, reaching $108 with a $544B market cap and new highs near $110. Q1 2026 revenue hit $13.6B (up 7% YoY), exceeding guidance, with EPS of $0.29 (GAAP) and DCAI up 22% on AI demand. The stock jumped 20% post-earnings, driven by CPU recovery and foundry progress. Analyst consensus holds at $79 average target with mixed ratings, citing execution risks in a competitive landscape despite scale advantages.

KLIC Overview and Recent Performance

Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) (NASDAQ: KLIC) designs and sells capital equipment and consumables for semiconductor assembly, including ball bonding, wedge bonding, advanced packaging solutions, and aftermarket services. Headquartered in Singapore, it supports integrated circuits, LEDs, power discretes, and automotive suppliers worldwide.

KLIC has risen 102% YTD and nearly 200% over the past year, trading near $92 with a $4.8B market cap and 52-week highs. Q1 FY26 revenue reached $200M, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.44 beating estimates amid improving demand and 14% aftermarket growth. Guidance points to sequential revenue uptick, fueled by advanced packaging and memory ramps. Analysts maintain Buy ratings with $72 average targets, highlighting cyclical recovery but noting utilization risks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 total bots, chosen for their superior performance in current market conditions. These bots employ advanced strategies like momentum, sector rotation, and price action across sectors including semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays. Notable stats include annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0, with some achieving 100% profitable trades in short-term portfolios. For instance, semiconductor-focused bots show +95% annualized returns and 68% win rates on tickers like NVDA and AMD. Each bot trades unique sets of tickers with varied timeframes from intraday to multi-week holds, offering copy trading signals, customizable risk controls like 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss, and no minimum balances. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to enhance strategies—visit Trending AI Robots for real-time insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FORM, INTC, and KLIC operate in the semiconductor value chain, with FORM focused on testing, KLIC on assembly/packaging, and INTC on design/foundry. Growth drivers include AI/HBM demand for all, but INTC benefits from scale in data centers, while equipment firms like FORM and KLIC leverage capex cycles.

Recent momentum favors INTC (193% YTD) over FORM (160%) and KLIC (102%), with all hitting highs. Risk factors: INTC's turnaround execution amid competition; FORM and KLIC's cyclicality tied to fab utilization. Valuation sensitivity is high for smaller caps—FORM trades at premium multiples post-earnings—while INTC offers liquidity. Market sentiment tilts bullish on sector tailwinds, but trade-offs include INTC's stability vs. equipment peers' higher beta.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors INTC for its unmatched scale, trend consistency in AI/data center recovery, and relative stability amid sector volatility. With 193% YTD gains, Q1 beats, and foundry catalysts, it shows stronger positioning than FORM's testing niche or KLIC's packaging exposure, though probabilistic edges depend on sustained capex.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2026
Stock price -- (FORM: $126.27INTC: $108.77KLIC: $102.04)
Brand notoriety: FORM and KLIC are not notable and INTC is notable
FORM and KLIC are part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and INTC is in the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORM: 145%, INTC: 108%, KLIC: 126%
Market capitalization -- FORM: $9.84B, INTC: $546.68B, KLIC: $5.34B
$FORM [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $9.84B. $KLIC’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $ $5.34B. $INTC [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $ $546.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $ $617.25B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $5.46T to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $ $52.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $143.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and KLIC’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FORM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KLIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORM and KLIC are a better buy in the long-term than INTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and KLIC’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INTC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KLIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORM and KLIC are a better buy in the short-term than INTC.

Price Growth

FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -14.61% price change this week, while INTC (@Semiconductors) price change was -12.93% , and KLIC (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FORM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

INTC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

KLIC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTC($547B) has a higher market cap than FORM($9.84B) and KLIC($5.34B). INTC has higher P/E ratio than FORM and KLIC: INTC (904.17) vs FORM (145.13) and KLIC (98.68). INTC YTD gains are higher at: 194.770 vs. FORM (126.371) and KLIC (124.669). INTC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.4B vs. FORM (128M) and KLIC (87.7M). INTC has more cash in the bank: 32.8B vs. KLIC (488M) and FORM (303M). FORM has less debt than KLIC and INTC: FORM (31.9M) vs KLIC (39.8M) and INTC (45B). INTC has higher revenues than FORM and KLIC: INTC (53.8B) vs FORM (840M) and KLIC (768M).
FORMINTCKLIC
Capitalization9.84B547B5.34B
EBITDA128M11.4B87.7M
Gain YTD126.371194.770124.669
P/E Ratio145.13904.1798.68
Revenue840M53.8B768M
Total Cash303M32.8B488M
Total Debt31.9M45B39.8M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FORM vs INTC vs KLIC: Fundamental Ratings
FORM
INTC
KLIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
899239
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
233939
SMR RATING
1..100
809181
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36235
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KLIC's Valuation (68) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FORM (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as INTC (98) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLIC's stock grew similarly to FORM’s and similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as KLIC (39) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as INTC (39) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FORM's stock grew similarly to KLIC’s and similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's SMR Rating (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as KLIC (81) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as INTC (91) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FORM's stock grew similarly to KLIC’s and similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.

INTC's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLIC (35) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FORM (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that INTC's stock grew somewhat faster than KLIC’s and somewhat faster than FORM’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLIC (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (80) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FORM's stock grew somewhat faster than KLIC’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORMINTCKLIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KLIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPYP43.450.08
+0.18%
Tortoise North American Pipeline
NVYY14.140.01
+0.10%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
FYT63.35-0.93
-1.44%
First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF
VXUS83.11-1.91
-2.25%
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
IWML29.11-1.35
-4.42%
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Fctr TR ETN

FORM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORM
1D Price
Change %
FORM100%
-1.34%
RMBS - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
SLAB - FORM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
ADI - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
ARM - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
-8.46%
QCOM - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More

INTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTC
1D Price
Change %
INTC100%
-6.18%
LRCX - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.82%
AMAT - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
KLIC - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
FORM - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
VECO - INTC
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
More