Advertisement
GD or HII or RTX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs. Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) vs. RTX Corporation (RTX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GD boasts a $118 billion backlog with strong Marine Systems growth, delivering steady 8.41% YTD gains and a favorable P/E of 23.53.
- HII leads with 26.58% YTD performance and robust naval shipbuilding demand, though more specialized exposure heightens execution risks.
- RTX shows 14%+ YTD momentum amid missile and aviation contracts, supported by a massive $281 billion market cap but elevated P/E of 42.38.
- All three benefit from rising defense budgets and geopolitical tensions, with recent Q4 earnings beats and contract wins bolstering outlooks.
- Diversified GD and scale-driven RTX offer stability, while HII's naval focus drives outsized recent gains in the sector.
- Relative performance highlights HII's surge, but GD's backlog visibility positions it for consistent execution.
Introduction
General Dynamics Corporation (GD), Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), and RTX Corporation (RTX) represent key players in the aerospace and defense sector, benefiting from elevated geopolitical tensions, expanding U.S. military budgets, and sustained demand for advanced systems. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers. Traders seeking momentum amid volatility and long-term investors eyeing backlog stability will find value in understanding their contrasts in diversification, naval focus, and scale. Amid broader sector tailwinds like submarine contracts and missile replenishment, relative performance offers insights into optimal exposure.
GD Overview and Recent Performance
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is a diversified aerospace and defense firm spanning Marine Systems, Combat Systems, Aerospace, and Technologies. Recent market activity reflects resilience, with shares at approximately $363 and 8.41% YTD gains, outpacing the S&P 500. Q4 2025 revenue hit $14.4 billion, up 7.8% year-over-year, driven by Marine Systems' 21.7% growth and a record $118 billion backlog—up 30%—fueled by submarine contracts. Sentiment has strengthened on international orders from Germany, Norway, and others for vehicles and systems, alongside AI integration efforts. Trading at a P/E of 23.53 with $98 billion market cap, GD exhibits low beta (0.37), appealing amid volatility, though supply chain pressures linger.
HII Overview and Recent Performance
Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), the largest U.S. military shipbuilder, focuses on nuclear-powered submarines, aircraft carriers, and surface combatants via Ingalls and Newport News divisions. Shares trade around $429, with standout 26.58% YTD and 123% one-year returns, reflecting naval demand surge. Recent Q4 revenue of $3.48 billion beat estimates by 12.7%, supported by a $53-57 billion backlog and milestones like DDG destroyer deliveries and Virginia-class submarines. Unmanned systems advancements and rare earth supply responses have lifted sentiment, with a P/E around 28 amid $17 billion market cap. Low beta (0.28) underscores stability, tempered by shipyard execution risks.+Opinions+on+Sea+Trials+and+Earnings+Beat)
RTX Overview and Recent Performance
RTX Corporation (RTX), formerly Raytheon Technologies, integrates Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney, and Raytheon for aviation, missiles, and defense systems. Shares hover near $210, posting 14%+ YTD gains and 63% annual rise, backed by a $282 billion market cap. Recent strength stems from $472 million+ contracts, including DARPA and German optics, plus Patriot and SM-6 volume growth amid munitions replenishment. Q4 sales and EPS beat expectations, with a $251 billion backlog signaling multi-year visibility. P/E at 42.38 reflects premium valuation, influenced by commercial aviation recovery and defense escalation, with beta at 0.41.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 high-performing AI trading bots optimized for current market conditions, drawn from hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. AI analyzes all bots to spotlight trending ones excelling in volatility—low, medium, or high—highlighting themes like aerospace & defense (e.g., ITA, DFEN bots at +32% annualized, 80% win rates), semiconductors (+134% annualized), industrials/infrastructure (+79%), and energy/mining (+218% annualized with 76% win rates and profit factors up to 25.83). These bots showcase win rates of 52-95%, profit factors to 25+, and returns up to +218%, often beating the S&P 500 via momentum, sector rotations, and hedging. Explore diverse strategies, timeframes (5-min to 60D), and subscribe for copy trading to leverage top performers in today's environment.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GD, HII, and RTX operate in aerospace/defense but diverge in models: GD's diversification across marine (submarines), combat vehicles, jets, and IT contrasts HII's naval shipbuilding purity and RTX's missile/aviation breadth. Growth drivers include GD's $118B backlog for steady execution, HII's submarine/carrier ramps amid Navy priorities, and RTX's $251B backlog from Patriot/SM-6 international demand. Recent momentum favors HII (26% YTD) over RTX (14%) and GD (8%), but risks tilt: HII faces shipyard delays, RTX supply dependencies, GD supply chains. All share sector exposure to budgets/geopolitics, low betas (<0.4), but GD/RTX scale ($98B/$282B caps) versus HII ($17B) aids resilience. Valuations: GD cheapest (P/E 23.5), RTX priciest (42); sentiment bullish across, with analysts raising targets on contracts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors GD for its trend consistency via the $118 billion backlog, Marine Systems catalysts, and balanced diversification, offering probabilistic stability relative to HII's naval volatility and RTX's premium valuation. Observable factors like low beta, earnings beats, and international orders position GD strongly amid sector rotation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHII’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and RTX’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- GD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HII’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- RTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and RTX’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RTX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GD (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while HII (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +0.10% , and RTX (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated -2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
GD is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
HII is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
RTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+4.81% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| GD | HII | RTX | |
| Capitalization | 91.1B | 15.5B | 264B |
| EBITDA | 6.43B | 1.21B | 14.9B |
| Gain YTD | 0.764 | 16.459 | 7.455 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.77 | 25.65 | 39.60 |
| Revenue | 52.6B | 12.5B | 88.6B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 774M | 7.44B |
| Total Debt | 9.79B | 2.92B | 39.5B |
GD | HII | RTX | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 30 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 60 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 44 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 19 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GD's Valuation (15) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HII (15) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is in the same range as RTX (39) in the null industry. This means that GD's stock grew similarly to HII’s and similarly to RTX’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as GD (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is in the same range as HII (30) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX's stock grew similarly to GD’s and similarly to HII’s over the last 12 months.
GD's SMR Rating (48) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HII (60) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is in the same range as RTX (67) in the null industry. This means that GD's stock grew similarly to HII’s and similarly to RTX’s over the last 12 months.
HII's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as RTX (48) in the null industry, and is in the same range as GD (58) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HII's stock grew similarly to RTX’s and similarly to GD’s over the last 12 months.
HII's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTX (52) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GD (54) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HII's stock grew somewhat faster than RTX’s and somewhat faster than GD’s over the last 12 months.
| GD | HII | RTX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 60% | 13 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IWM | 275.78 | 5.83 | +2.16% |
| iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |||
| SDVD | 23.03 | 0.39 | +1.72% |
| FT Vest SMID Ris Div Ach Trg IncETF | |||
| QQQY | 22.61 | 0.23 | +1.03% |
| Defiance Nasdaq 100 Trgt 30 Wkly Dis ETF | |||
| CVRT | 47.18 | 0.43 | +0.91% |
| Calamos Convertible Equity Alt ETF | |||
| MYCI | 24.95 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| State Street® My2029 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
HII and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HII has been loosely correlated with GD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HII jumps, then GD could also see price increases.
RTX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.