This stock comparison examines GD, HWM, and TDG, key players in the aerospace and defense sector amid rising global tensions and commercial aviation recovery. General Dynamics focuses on diversified defense systems, Howmet Aerospace on engineered components, and TransDigm on proprietary aircraft parts. Traders seeking momentum in growth areas and investors eyeing stable defense exposure will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning in today's environment of increased military spending and jet production ramps.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is a global aerospace and defense leader, producing business jets via Gulfstream, submarines, combat vehicles, and IT systems. In recent market activity, GD shares have shown resilience, with YTD gains of 5.7% and 38% over the past year, trading around $354 within a 52-week range of $239-$370. Quarterly revenue growth stands at 7.8%, supported by a $52.6B trailing revenue base and robust defense backlogs. Sentiment has been bolstered by a recent quarterly dividend increase to $1.59 and positioning in U.S. shipbuilding revival amid geopolitical conflicts, though shares dipped slightly more than the market in volatile sessions. Analysts maintain a Hold rating with a $395 target, reflecting steady demand but cautious growth expectations.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) specializes in advanced engineered solutions like jet engine components, fasteners, and airframe structures for aerospace applications. Recent weeks have highlighted HWM's momentum, with YTD returns of 17.5% and 91% over one year, trading near $241 in a 52-week span of $105-$267. Quarterly revenue surged 14.6% on $8.3B trailing sales, fueled by strong commercial aerospace demand. Analyst upgrades, including RBC's Outperform with a $300 target, underscore growth in engines and gas turbines, despite short-term pullbacks. Positive sentiment stems from earnings momentum and sector tailwinds, positioning HWM as a top growth pick amid aviation recovery.
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) designs and supplies highly engineered aircraft components, emphasizing aftermarket proprietary parts across commercial and military platforms. In recent market activity, TDG has displayed mixed results, with 6.1% YTD gains and flat 1-year performance, priced around $1,248 in a $1,184-$1,624 range. Quarterly revenue grew 13.9% to $9.1B trailing, driven by acquisitions and aerospace demand. A Zacks Buy upgrade highlights earnings potential, though valuation scrutiny and supply chain risks temper enthusiasm. Sentiment reflects optimism for defense spending offsets, with a $1,594 analyst target signaling upside.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots employ advanced machine learning for pattern recognition, trend prediction, and automated execution, with trending ones selected based on real-time performance in current market conditions like sector rotations in aerospace and defense. Standouts include multi-agent strategies yielding up to 192% annualized returns, 70-90% win rates, and profit factors over 2.0, often on leveraged ETFs or high-growth tickers. For instance, aerospace-focused bots on XAR and ITA have posted 102%+ returns recently. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge—visit Trending AI Robots for live stats and subscription options.
GD, HWM, and TDG operate in aerospace and defense but differ in models: GD's diversified defense primes offer stability (low 22.9 PE, 17.7% ROE), contrasting HWM's components growth (14.6% rev growth, 30.4% ROE but 64.7 PE) and TDG's aftermarket focus (13.9% rev growth, high EBITDA margins). Growth drivers favor HWM and TDG via aviation recovery, while GD leverages geopolitics. Recent momentum shines for HWM (17% YTD), risks include TDG's debt and supply chains for all. Valuation sensitivity: GD cheapest (1.8x sales), TDG mid-range (7.8x), HWM premium (11.7x). Sentiment tilts positive on defense budgets versus commercial cycles.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors HWM due to superior trend consistency, earnings growth (18.5%), and relative momentum in commercial aerospace catalysts, positioning it ahead probabilistically over GD's stability and TDG's recovery potential amid sector tailwinds.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and TDG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TDG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GD (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.20% , and TDG (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +4.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.07%.
GD is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
HWM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
TDG is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| GD | HWM | TDG | |
| Capitalization | 90B | 102B | 72B |
| EBITDA | 6.43B | 2.27B | 4.63B |
| Gain YTD | 0.764 | 24.786 | -4.153 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.50 | 68.90 | 41.01 |
| Revenue | 52.6B | 8.25B | 9.11B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 742M | 2.53B |
| Total Debt | 9.79B | 3.21B | 30B |
GD | HWM | TDG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 3 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 31 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 10 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 22 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GD's Valuation (15) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (72) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HWM (73) in the null industry. This means that GD's stock grew somewhat faster than TDG’s and somewhat faster than HWM’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GD (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is in the same range as TDG (25) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM's stock grew similarly to GD’s and similarly to TDG’s over the last 12 months.
TDG's SMR Rating (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (31) in the null industry, and is in the same range as GD (48) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that TDG's stock grew similarly to HWM’s and similarly to GD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's Price Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (58) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for GD (58) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM's stock grew somewhat faster than TDG’s and somewhat faster than GD’s over the last 12 months.
HWM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as GD (54) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TDG (77) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM's stock grew similarly to GD’s and somewhat faster than TDG’s over the last 12 months.
| GD | HWM | TDG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 4 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 44% | 7 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 33% | 5 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 61% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGGG | 28.78 | 0.09 | +0.30% |
| Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | |||
| SPHY | 23.60 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| State Street® SPDR® Port Hi Yld Bd ETF | |||
| YMAR | 28.32 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bffr ETF Mar | |||
| IPOS | 20.80 | -0.32 | -1.51% |
| Renaissance International IPO ETF | |||
| JNUG | 237.11 | -5.21 | -2.15% |
| Direxion Daily Jr Gld Mnrs Bull 2X ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDG has been loosely correlated with HEI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDG jumps, then HEI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDG | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| HEI - TDG | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| VVX - TDG | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| SAFRY - TDG | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| RYCEY - TDG | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| SARO - TDG | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||