Advertisement
HBAN or JPM or WFC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) vs. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HBAN (~$15.40) lags YTD at -10.86% amid merger integrations with Cadence Bank and Veritex, trading at a P/E of ~10.9 with a 4% dividend yield, appealing to value seekers despite recent weakness.
- JPM (~$285) shows YTD gains of ~10% with superior 1-year returns (~30%), bolstered by diversified revenue and strong trading, at a P/E of ~14 and stable market positioning.
- WFC (~$74) leads YTD at ~19% but faces recent dips of ~15% monthly, with analysts eyeing earnings recovery and a favorable P/E relative to peers.
- All three reflect banking sector pressures from oil volatility and economic signals, yet JPM exhibits the most consistent momentum.
- Regional HBAN offers growth via expansion, while megabanks JPM and WFC provide scale advantages in turbulent markets.
Introduction
This comparison examines HBAN, JPM, and WFC, representing a mix of regional and megabank players in the U.S. financial sector. Investors and traders analyzing bank stocks amid interest rate shifts, merger activity, and macroeconomic pressures—like rising oil prices and labor data—will find value here. These institutions differ in scale, with HBAN focusing on Midwest and Southern expansion, while JPM and WFC leverage national footprints. Recent market activity highlights relative performance, valuation, and sentiment shifts for informed positioning.
HBAN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) operates as a regional bank with over 1,000 branches across 14 states, emphasizing commercial banking, consumer lending, and deposits in the Midwest and emerging Southern markets. Recent weeks have seen share price pressure, with YTD declines around -11% and trading near $15.40, down from 52-week highs above $19. Key influences include the February 2026 completion of its $7.4 billion merger with Cadence Bank and prior Veritex acquisition, expanding to nearly 1,400 branches and adding billions in loans/deposits. While integration costs contributed to Q4 2025 earnings misses (EPS $0.37 vs. $0.40 expected), management projects 6-9% PPNR growth and 18-19% ROTCE by 2027. Analysts maintain a Moderate Buy rating with targets implying ~7% upside, supported by a ~4% dividend yield and P/E of 10.9, though sentiment reflects caution on dilution and execution risks.
JPM Overview and Recent Performance
JPMorgan Chase (JPM), the largest U.S. bank by market cap (~$800B), spans consumer/investment banking, asset management, and trading across global markets. In recent market activity, shares hover around $285 within a $202-$337 range, posting YTD gains of ~11% and 1-year returns near 30%, outperforming peers amid volatility. Strong Q4 2025 results ($57B annual net income) were driven by 40% equities trading growth and wealth management, despite reserves like $2.2B for Apple Card. Influences include branch expansion plans (160+ in 2026), regulatory scrutiny, and legal matters such as crypto-related suits. With a P/E of ~14, ROE ~16%, and steady dividends, sentiment remains resilient, buoyed by diversified revenue and pristine credit quality versus regional counterparts.
WFC Overview and Recent Performance
Wells Fargo (WFC) provides retail banking, mortgages, and commercial services nationwide, with a focus on U.S. deposits and lending. Shares trade near $74, showing strong YTD performance (~19%) but recent monthly dips (~15%), within a broader uptrend. Factors include anticipation of earnings growth (22% YoY EPS expected) post-regulatory asset cap lift, alongside sector headwinds like oil-driven slowdowns. Q4 results highlighted NII beats and dividend hikes, with analysts optimistic on ROTCE approaching 17-18%. At a competitive P/E and ~2.4% yield, performance reflects recovery potential, though elevated credit and mortgage sensitivities weigh on short-term sentiment compared to more diversified peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available on the platform, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in current conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies—technical analysis, fundamentals, machine learning—across timeframes like 5min to 60min, delivering stats such as annualized returns up to +208%, win rates to 95%, and profit factors exceeding 25. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots on SOXL (+110%) and multi-sector agents blending aerospace, energy, and tech with 75-90% win rates. Tailored for stocks, ETFs, and crypto, they adapt to volatility, offering copy trading for retail users. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to your style and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HBAN’s regional model drives growth through mergers, contrasting JPM and WFC’s scale in investment banking and mortgages. Valuation favors HBAN (P/E ~11) for value, while JPM (~14) trades on superior ROE and momentum. Recent momentum shows WFC’s YTD lead but volatility, versus JPM’s consistency. Risks include HBAN’s integration execution, WFC’s regulatory legacy, and shared exposure to credit cycles/oil shocks; JPM mitigates via diversification. Sentiment tilts to megabanks for stability amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI leans toward JPM based on trend consistency, diversified catalysts like trading revenue, and relative YTD/1-year outperformance. While HBAN offers merger-driven upside and WFC value, JPM’s positioning suggests higher probability of stability in volatile conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJPM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and WFC’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- HBAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JPM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WFC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HBAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- JPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.07% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was +5.88% , and WFC (@Major Banks) price fluctuated +6.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
HBAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.
WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.92% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Major Banks (+3.44% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| HBAN | JPM | WFC | |
| Capitalization | 33.8B | 832B | 265B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -3.408 | -2.761 | -7.250 |
| P/E Ratio | 11.94 | 15.50 | 13.74 |
| Revenue | 8.13B | 182B | 83.7B |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 21.7B | 34.8B |
| Total Debt | 18.5B | 500B | 193B |
HBAN | JPM | WFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 23 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 15 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 1 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 49 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 30 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBAN's Valuation (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (81) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as JPM (84) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBAN's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (19) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HBAN (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and somewhat faster than HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as HBAN (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (49) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as HBAN (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (47) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as HBAN (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that JPM's stock grew similarly to WFC’s and similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
| HBAN | JPM | WFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | 14 days ago 59% | 11 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 71% |
Advertisement
HBAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBAN has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBAN jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBAN | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| FITB - HBAN | 90% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| KEY - HBAN | 90% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| PNC - HBAN | 89% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| CFG - HBAN | 89% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| RF - HBAN | 89% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||
WFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.