HSY
Price
$202.31
Change
-$8.53 (-4.05%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
41.01B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$59.00
Change
-$0.09 (-0.15%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
75.72B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$58.34
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
126.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HSY or MDLZ or UL

Header iconHSY vs MDLZ vs UL Comparison
Open Charts HSY vs MDLZ vs ULBanner chart's image
HSY vs MDLZ vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Hershey Company (HSY) vs. Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. Unilever PLC (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HSY leads with strong recent momentum, posting over 20% YTD gains amid resilient demand for confectionery and salty snacks.
  • MDLZ offers a compelling dividend yield around 3.5% but trails peers with modest 5% YTD returns due to cocoa cost pressures.
  • UL provides stability with a diversified portfolio across personal care and foods, showing low beta and steady 2-3% YTD performance.
  • HSY trades at a premium P/E over 50x, reflecting growth expectations, while MDLZ and UL appear more attractively valued under 30x.
  • All three benefit from defensive consumer staples positioning, but HSY shows superior relative strength in recent market activity.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines HSY, MDLZ, and UL, three prominent consumer staples companies with exposure to snacks, confectionery, and household essentials. These firms offer defensive qualities amid economic uncertainty, appealing to income-focused investors and traders seeking relative stability. By analyzing recent performance, valuations, and market positioning, this article highlights key contrasts in momentum, risk profiles, and growth drivers, aiding decisions in the current volatile environment.

HSY Overview and Recent Performance

The Hershey Company (HSY) manufactures confectionery, chocolate, and salty snacks, with iconic brands like Hershey's, Reese's, and SkinnyPop. Operating primarily in North America but exporting to 65 countries, it benefits from strong brand loyalty and pricing power. In recent market activity, HSY shares have gained over 20% YTD and 24% in the past three months, outperforming the S&P 500. Sentiment has improved due to robust demand, expansions into salty snacks, and analyst upgrades, despite elevated cocoa costs and high valuations prompting a consensus Hold rating. Trading around $219 with a market cap of $44B, P/E of 50x, and 2.6% yield, it reflects optimism for 2026 earnings growth.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International (MDLZ) is a global snacking leader with brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Ritz, spanning chocolate, biscuits, and gum across 150 countries. Its diversified portfolio mitigates single-category risks. Recent weeks have seen modest 5% YTD gains for MDLZ shares, around $57 with a $73B market cap, pressured by record cocoa prices impacting margins despite 9% revenue growth in Q4. Strategic pricing, acquisitions like Evirth, and AI efficiencies have supported adjusted EPS beats, but cautious 2026 outlooks temper enthusiasm. P/E stands at 30x with a 3.5% yield, attracting value-oriented investors amid mixed analyst views.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

Unilever PLC (UL) produces fast-moving consumer goods in beauty, personal care, home care, and foods, with brands in hair care, soaps, and more across Asia Pacific, Africa, Americas, and Europe. Its broad exposure provides resilience. UL shares hover near $66, up about 2% YTD with a $145B market cap, reflecting steady performance amid short-term weakness like 5% weekly dips. Recent partnerships for digital innovation and product launches bolster sentiment, though competition and market pressures persist. With a P/E of 22x and 3.3% yield, it appeals for stability, supported by low beta of 0.26.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only those excelling in current market conditions—such as volatility in energy, semiconductors, and aerospace—earn a spot, with 25+ listed boasting annualized returns from +13% to +215%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors up to 25.8. Examples include a multi-sector 15min bot at +132% annualized (62% win rate) and a volatility tech 60min bot at +215% (76% win rate). These stats highlight adaptive performance across bull and bear phases. Traders can explore and subscribe to copy these bots for automated edge in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

HSY, MDLZ, and UL operate in consumer staples, but differ in focus: HSY emphasizes North American confectionery/salty snacks, MDLZ global snacks/biscuits, and UL diversified care/hygiene. Growth drivers include HSY's brand expansions and MDLZ's emerging markets, versus UL's prestige beauty. Recent momentum favors HSY (20%+ YTD), over MDLZ (5%) and UL (2%). Risks: cocoa volatility hits HSY/MDLZ harder than UL's broader base. Valuation sensitivity shows HSY at 50x P/E (premium for growth), MDLZ 30x, UL 22x. Sentiment leans positive for HSY via upgrades, while peers face cost scrutiny.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors HSY due to its superior trend consistency, outperformance in recent weeks, and catalysts like salty snacks growth amid defensive demand. While MDLZ and UL offer value and stability, HSY's relative positioning suggests higher probability of near-term upside, though premiums warrant caution.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (HSY: $202.31MDLZ: $59.00UL: $58.34)
Brand notoriety: HSY and UL are not notable and MDLZ is notable
HSY and MDLZ are part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry, and UL is in the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSY: 100%, MDLZ: 65%, UL: 84%
Market capitalization -- HSY: $41.01B, MDLZ: $75.72B, UL: $126.01B
$HSY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $41.01B. $MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $ $75.72B. $UL [@Household/Personal Care] has a market capitalization of $ $126.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $ $75.72B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $337.35B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $ $14.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSY is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than HSY and UL.

Price Growth

HSY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.88% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.54% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

HSY is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.04% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($126B) has a higher market cap than MDLZ($75.7B) and HSY($41B). HSY has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ and UL: HSY (46.62) vs MDLZ (31.22) and UL (19.32). HSY YTD gains are higher at: 11.901 vs. MDLZ (10.553) and UL (-10.115). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.3B vs. MDLZ (4.97B) and HSY (1.94B). HSY has less debt than MDLZ and UL: HSY (5.74B) vs MDLZ (21.8B) and UL (). UL has higher revenues than MDLZ and HSY: UL (59.8B) vs MDLZ (38.5B) and HSY (11.7B).
HSYMDLZUL
Capitalization41B75.7B126B
EBITDA1.94B4.97B11.3B
Gain YTD11.90110.553-10.115
P/E Ratio46.6231.2219.32
Revenue11.7B38.5B59.8B
Total Cash926MN/AN/A
Total Debt5.74B21.8BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSY vs MDLZ vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
HSY
MDLZ
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51951
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
657279
SMR RATING
1..100
457196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
495377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
508585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as HSY (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry, and is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to HSY’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

HSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HSY's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

HSY's SMR Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HSY's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

HSY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HSY's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

HSY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HSY's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSYMDLZUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSK11.650.19
+1.66%
REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF
NKX12.210.05
+0.41%
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
SCHO24.22-0.01
-0.04%
Schwab Short-Term US Treasury ETF™
VEGN60.01-0.05
-0.08%
US Vegan Climate ETF
EZJ58.31-1.03
-1.73%
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-0.15%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.41%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-0.21%
PG - UL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
CL - UL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
RBGLY - UL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
CHD - UL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
CLX - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
More