Advertisement
HUBB or POWL or VRT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) vs. Powell Industries (POWL) vs. Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HUBB delivered 11% Q1 revenue growth to $1.52 billion with raised full-year guidance, but shares pulled back amid acquisition news.
- POWL reported Q2 revenue up 6% to $297 million, with new orders nearly doubling to $490 million and a record $1.8 billion backlog fueled by data center demand.
- VRT achieved 30% Q1 sales growth to $2.65 billion, driven by AI data center needs, and raised 2026 EPS outlook while expanding liquid cooling capabilities.
- All three stocks benefit from electrification and data center trends, with POWL and VRT showing superior YTD gains of over 170% and 100%, respectively, versus HUBB's 16%.
- VRT leads in scale with $10.8 billion trailing revenue, while POWL exhibits explosive order growth.
- Recent momentum favors POWL and VRT amid AI infrastructure buildout.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines HUBB, POWL, and VRT, three leaders in electrical equipment and infrastructure solutions amid rising demand for grid upgrades, data centers, and electrification. Investors tracking industrial cyclicals and AI-related plays will find value in their relative performance, as these firms capitalize on utility transmission, power distribution, and cooling technologies. Recent quarters highlight contrasts in growth trajectories and market positioning, offering insights into sector rotation opportunities in the current environment.
HUBB Overview and Recent Performance
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and utility solutions, operating through Electrical Solutions and Utility Solutions segments. These products support non-residential construction, industrial applications, and grid transmission via components like arresters, insulators, and smart meters.
In recent market activity, HUBB reported first-quarter 2026 net sales of $1.52 billion, up 11% year-over-year with 8.2% organic growth. Adjusted diluted EPS rose 16% to $3.93, prompting raised full-year guidance for 8-11% sales growth and adjusted EPS of $19.30-$19.85. Sentiment has been influenced by a $3 billion acquisition of NSI Industries to expand electrical fittings, though shares experienced an 8% pullback amid valuation concerns. Year-to-date returns stand at about 16%, reflecting steady utility and data center demand offset by broader market rotations.
POWL Overview and Recent Performance
Powell Industries (POWL) designs, manufactures, and services custom-engineered electrical power distribution and control systems, including switchgear, motor control centers, and integrated substations for oil/gas, utilities, data centers, and mining.
Recent performance underscores robust demand, with second-quarter fiscal 2026 revenue at $296.6 million, up 6% year-over-year, and net income near $45.9 million. New orders surged 97% to $490 million, boosting backlog to a record $1.8 billion, up 33%. A post-quarter mega AI data center order exceeding $400 million—the largest in company history—highlights electrification tailwinds. Shares have rallied sharply, with year-to-date gains over 177%, driven by AI and utility project visibility, though elevated valuations reflect this momentum.
VRT Overview and Recent Performance
Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) provides critical digital infrastructure, including power management, thermal solutions, and IT systems for data centers, networks, and industrial sites.
In recent weeks, VRT posted first-quarter 2026 net sales of $2.65 billion, up 30% with 23% organic growth, fueled by AI data center expansion. Adjusted diluted EPS climbed 83% to $1.17, leading to raised full-year guidance of 29-31% organic sales growth and EPS of $6.30-$6.40. Acquisitions like Strategic Thermal Labs enhance liquid cooling for high-density computing. Year-to-date returns exceed 100%, with shares surging on backlog strength and hyperscale demand, though volatility persists in the high-growth segment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots, powered by advanced financial learning models, deliver annualized returns up to 279% with win rates of 70-95% and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in sectors like technology, energy, and industrials—outpacing benchmarks through momentum, sector rotation, and pattern recognition. Only the most suitable for prevailing volatility and trends earn a spot, with stats like 73-86% success rates on ETFs and up to 192% gains in aerospace/defense. Explore these bots to align with your risk profile and discover automated edges in today's market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HUBB, POWL, and VRT operate in overlapping electrical infrastructure spaces but diverge in focus: HUBB emphasizes utility components and construction wiring with balanced segments; POWL specializes in custom power systems for high-voltage projects; VRT leads in data center power/thermal via scale.
Growth drivers contrast sharply: VRT's 30% revenue surge ties to AI hyperscalers, versus POWL's order explosion (97% QoQ) and HUBB's steady 11%. Recent momentum favors POWL (177% YTD) and VRT (110% YTD) over HUBB (16%).
Risk profiles differ: VRT faces highest volatility (beta ~2.1) from data center cycles; POWL shows order lumpiness; HUBB offers stability via diversification. All share sector exposure to electrification, but VRT is most AI-sensitive. Valuations reflect hype: POWL at 52x P/E, VRT 82x, HUBB 30x. Sentiment tilts toward data center purity, trading steadier utility growth for momentum.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors POWL for its exceptional order momentum, record backlog visibility into 2028, and positioning in AI data centers alongside utilities—outpacing peers in recent relative performance. While VRT offers scale and HUBB stability, POWL's catalysts suggest higher probability of sustained upside in the near term, based on trend consistency and infrastructure tailwinds.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOWL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and VRT’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- HUBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- POWL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- VRT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POWL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and VRT’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- POWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- VRT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBB (@Electrical Products) experienced а -5.04% price change this week, while POWL (@Electrical Products) price change was -15.09% , and VRT (@Electrical Products) price fluctuated -12.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
POWL is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
VRT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-2.50% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| HUBB | POWL | VRT | |
| Capitalization | 24.4B | 9.53B | 124B |
| EBITDA | 1.44B | 232M | 2.32B |
| Gain YTD | 4.198 | 146.507 | 99.189 |
| P/E Ratio | 27.28 | 51.05 | 81.06 |
| Revenue | 6B | 1.13B | 10.8B |
| Total Cash | 517M | 545M | 2.5B |
| Total Debt | 2.74B | 1.96M | 3.27B |
HUBB | POWL | VRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 65 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 6 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 33 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 35 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 3 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBB's Valuation (76) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as POWL (93) in the Electrical Products industry, and is in the same range as VRT (94) in the null industry. This means that HUBB's stock grew similarly to POWL’s and similarly to VRT’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as VRT (10) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HUBB (26) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that POWL's stock grew similarly to VRT’s and similarly to HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
VRT's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as POWL (33) in the Electrical Products industry, and is in the same range as HUBB (37) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that VRT's stock grew similarly to POWL’s and similarly to HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as VRT (36) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HUBB (58) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that POWL's stock grew similarly to VRT’s and similarly to HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as VRT (23) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBB (43) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that POWL's stock grew similarly to VRT’s and somewhat faster than HUBB’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBB | POWL | VRT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
Advertisement
HUBB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBB has been loosely correlated with AEIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBB jumps, then AEIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBB | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| AEIS - HUBB | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| NVT - HUBB | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| LGRDY - HUBB | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| VRT - HUBB | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| AYI - HUBB | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
More | ||||
POWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POWL has been loosely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POWL jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWL | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| VRT - POWL | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| ABBNY - POWL | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| AEIS - POWL | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| PRYMY - POWL | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.73% | ||
| NVT - POWL | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||
VRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRT has been loosely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRT jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRT | 100% | -5.03% | ||
| NVT - VRT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| AEIS - VRT | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| HUBB - VRT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| POWL - VRT | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| BE - VRT | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||