HWM
Price
$254.06
Change
+$4.06 (+1.62%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
101.81B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JOBY
Price
$8.28
Change
-$0.35 (-4.06%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
8.11B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOC
Price
$690.57
Change
+$3.10 (+0.45%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
98.08B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWM or JOBY or NOC

Header iconHWM vs JOBY vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts HWM vs JOBY vs NOCBanner chart's image
HWM vs JOBY vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) vs. Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) vs. Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HWM has delivered a YTD return of 22.07% and 1-year return of 101.42%, driven by robust commercial aerospace demand.
  • NOC leads YTD performance at 33.03% with a 61.68% 1-year gain, supported by defense contracts and a record $95.68B backlog.
  • JOBY shows YTD gains of 27.65% and 43.83% over 1 year, boosted by Uber partnerships for electric air taxis in Dubai.
  • All three stocks benefit from aerospace trends, but NOC offers stability via defense exposure, while HWM excels in growth metrics.
  • Recent AI bots on Tickeron targeting aerospace/defense show annualized returns up to +98.79% with win rates over 70%.
  • Market caps: NOC $107.9B, HWM $100.7B, JOBY $9.2B, highlighting scale differences in relative performance.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines HWM, JOBY, and NOC, three companies operating within the aerospace and defense sectors amid rising demand for advanced aviation technologies and military capabilities. HWM focuses on engineered components, JOBY pioneers electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft, and NOC delivers integrated defense systems. Traders seeking growth in commercial aviation or stability in defense spending, as well as investors tracking sector momentum and relative performance, will find value in analyzing their recent market positioning, revenue drivers, and sentiment shifts.

HWM Overview and Recent Performance

Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) provides advanced engineered solutions for aerospace and transportation, operating through segments like Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels. In recent market activity, HWM has shown strong upward momentum, with shares trading around $250 within a 52-week range of $105-$267. YTD return stands at 22.07%, and 1-year at 101.42%, outperforming broader benchmarks. Sentiment has been bolstered by robust commercial aerospace growth, including a 13% year-over-year revenue increase in Q4 2025, driven by engine products and defense programs. Analysts maintain optimism, with an average price target of $278, citing strategic acquisitions and market positioning amid rising aircraft demand.

JOBY Overview and Recent Performance

Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) develops electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft for urban air mobility, facilitating passenger transport and related services globally. Shares recently closed near $9.55, within a 52-week range of $4.96-$20.95. The stock has posted a YTD return of 27.65% and 1-year return of 43.83%, reflecting volatility tied to development milestones. Recent weeks have seen positive sentiment from partnerships, including Uber for all-electric air taxi services in Dubai, advancing FAA certification and manufacturing scale-up. Despite cash burn concerns, progress in commercial testing has supported relative performance in the emerging eVTOL space, with analyst targets averaging $12.56.

NOC Overview and Recent Performance

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) is a leading aerospace and defense technology firm, with segments in Aeronautics Systems, Defense Systems, Mission Systems, and Space Systems. Trading around $756 in a 52-week range of $450-$774, NOC boasts a YTD return of 33.03% and 1-year return of 61.68%. Recent performance reflects steady gains from defense contracts, including a $225M award, and a record backlog exceeding $95B. While navigating rare earth supply challenges, the company's positioning in military programs and space initiatives has driven positive sentiment, with analysts setting an average target of $724.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers using technical and fundamental signals. These bots employ diverse strategies, timeframes from 5-min to 60-min, and focus on sectors like aerospace & defense, delivering annualized returns up to +134.76% (win rates 60-80%, profit factors over 2.0), such as AeroDefense DFEN at +98.79% win rate 71.70% and Aerospace HWM at +63.83% win rate 71.08%. Selected for top performance in current volatility, they offer real-time signals, virtual portfolios, and brokerage integration. Explore these high-performing bots tailored to market conditions at Trending AI Robots to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

HWM, JOBY, and NOC share aerospace exposure but diverge in business models: HWM's components supply commercial engines (growth via air travel recovery), JOBY's eVTOL targets disruptive urban mobility (high-risk innovation), and NOC's systems emphasize defense stability (government-backed revenue). Growth drivers contrast HWM and NOC's established momentum against JOBY's certification catalysts. Recent momentum favors NOC YTD, with HWM leading 1-year. Risks include JOBY's pre-revenue dilution, NOC's supply chains, and HWM's cyclicality. Valuation sensitivity is higher for JOBY amid speculation, while sentiment tilts toward defense reliability over commercial volatility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors NOC due to its trend consistency, defense backlog stability, and superior YTD positioning amid geopolitical catalysts, with bots like AeroDefense showing strong sector alignment. HWM follows closely on commercial growth, while JOBY offers higher upside potential probabilistically tied to eVTOL milestones.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (HWM: $254.06JOBY: $8.28NOC: $690.57)
Brand notoriety: HWM and JOBY are not notable and NOC is notable
HWM and NOC are part of the Aerospace & Defense industry, and JOBY is in the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWM: 86%, JOBY: 91%, NOC: 101%
Market capitalization -- HWM: $101.81B, JOBY: $8.11B, NOC: $98.08B
$HWM [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $101.81B. $NOC’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $ $98.08B. $JOBY [@Air Freight/Couriers] has a market capitalization of $ $8.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $ $327.05B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $ $58.27B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $ $24.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $ $8.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJOBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NOC’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JOBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the long-term than HWM, which in turn is a better option than JOBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JOBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NOC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JOBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NOC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JOBY is a better buy in the short-term than HWM and NOC.

Price Growth

HWM (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +9.19% price change this week, while JOBY (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -2.59% , and NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated -1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWM is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

JOBY is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2026.

NOC is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+4.33% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

@Air Freight/Couriers (+0.96% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWM($102B) and NOC($98.1B) has a higher market cap than JOBY($8.11B). HWM YTD gains are higher at: 23.991 vs. NOC (21.496) and JOBY (-37.273). NOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.21B vs. HWM (2.27B) and JOBY (-679.43M). NOC has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. JOBY (1.41B) and HWM (742M). JOBY has less debt than HWM and NOC: JOBY (36.8M) vs HWM (3.21B) and NOC (17B). NOC has higher revenues than HWM and JOBY: NOC (42B) vs HWM (8.25B) and JOBY (53.4M).
HWMJOBYNOC
Capitalization102B8.11B98.1B
EBITDA2.27B-679.43M7.21B
Gain YTD23.991-37.27321.496
P/E Ratio68.48N/A23.75
Revenue8.25B53.4M42B
Total Cash742M1.41B4.4B
Total Debt3.21B36.8M17B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWM vs NOC: Fundamental Ratings
HWM
NOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
3035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2129
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOC's Valuation (66) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HWM (75) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to HWM’s over the last 12 months.

HWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (7) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

HWM's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (35) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

HWM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (48) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

HWM's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (29) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that HWM’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWMJOBYNOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JOBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USEP39.620.14
+0.37%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF-Sep
PMAR45.750.13
+0.28%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Mar
WABF25.08N/A
N/A
Western Asset Bond ETF
BCLO49.11-0.01
-0.02%
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
VMBS47.02-0.03
-0.06%
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Secs ETF

HWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWM has been closely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWM jumps, then GE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWM
1D Price
Change %
HWM100%
+1.62%
GE - HWM
78%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
CW - HWM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
WWD - HWM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
SARO - HWM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
HEI - HWM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More