IESC
Price
$639.44
Change
-$14.84 (-2.27%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
12.74B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRIM
Price
$104.70
Change
-$3.93 (-3.62%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
5.68B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$714.13
Change
-$8.90 (-1.23%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
107.16B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IESC or PRIM or PWR

Header iconIESC vs PRIM vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts IESC vs PRIM vs PWRBanner chart's image
IESC vs PRIM vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? IES Holdings (IESC) vs. Primoris Services (PRIM) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IESC, PRIM, and PWR operate in the engineering and construction sector, benefiting from infrastructure and data center demand, with YTD returns of 70%, 64%, and 83% respectively.
  • PWR leads in scale with $115B market cap and $30B TTM revenue, while IESC ($13B cap, $3.6B revenue) and PRIM ($11B cap, $7.6B revenue) show strong growth profiles.
  • Valuation metrics reveal IESC at P/E 35 and PRIM at 41, more attractive than PWR's 106, amid recent earnings beats for IESC and PWR, miss for PRIM.
  • All three stocks have delivered triple-digit 1-year returns (175% IESC, 203% PRIM, 139% PWR), driven by energy transition and AI infrastructure tailwinds.
  • PWR reports record $48.5B backlog, signaling sustained demand, while IESC and PRIM focus on electrical and utilities segments.

Introduction

This comparison examines IESC, PRIM, and PWR, three leaders in the engineering and construction sector focused on infrastructure, utilities, and data centers. These stocks have captured investor attention amid rising demand for electrification, renewable energy, and AI-driven power needs. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and recent catalysts in the current market environment.

IESC Overview and Recent Performance

IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems for data centers, residential, commercial, and infrastructure markets. In recent market activity, the stock has surged, trading near its 52-week high of $677 with a YTD gain of 70% and 1-year return of 175%. Sentiment has been bolstered by strong Q2 FY26 results, with revenue at $974M and EPS of $5.44 beating estimates, driven by data center and infrastructure demand. TTM revenue stands at $3.63B, net income $378M, and low debt supports financial flexibility amid broader sector tailwinds.

PRIM Overview and Recent Performance

PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation) delivers infrastructure construction, maintenance, and engineering services across utilities and energy segments in the U.S. and Canada. Recent weeks saw the stock hit a 52-week high before pulling back post-Q1 2026 earnings, with YTD return of 64% and 1-year gain of 203%. Q1 revenue of $1.56B missed estimates, prompting lowered full-year EPS guidance to $4.90 midpoint, though TTM figures show $7.57B revenue and $275M net income. Momentum from prior backlog growth has tempered by execution challenges in recent quarters.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) provides comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, and pipelines. The stock has outperformed with YTD return of 83% and 1-year gain of 139%, recently hitting new highs. Q1 2026 results excelled, with $7.87B revenue (up 26% YoY), adjusted EPS $2.68 beating estimates, and raised full-year guidance amid a record $48.5B backlog fueled by utility and data center projects. TTM revenue is $30.1B, net income $1.1B.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ AI to navigate current market volatility, selecting opportunities in sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and infrastructure. Performance highlights include annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51%-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and trade durations from 15 minutes to 48 days. Strategies range from trend following and momentum to multi-agent systems with TP/SL exits (e.g., 3%/2%). Top bots target 1-18 tickers, emphasizing small caps, ETFs, and leveraged plays suited to today's conditions. Explore these for insights into automated trading across timeframes and styles.

Head-to-Head Comparison

All three firms share exposure to infrastructure and electrification but differ in scale and focus: PWR dominates with broad utility and pipeline services, $115B market cap, and massive backlog, versus IESC's electrical/data center niche ($13B cap) and PRIM's utilities/energy mix ($11B cap). Growth drivers include AI power demand for all, but PWR and IESC show superior recent earnings execution. Recent momentum favors PWR (83% YTD), though PRIM led 1-year at 203% pre-earnings dip. Risk factors: PWR carries higher debt ($6.3B), while IESC has minimal ($107M). Valuation sensitivity shows IESC (P/E 35) and PRIM (41) cheaper than PWR (106), trading at premiums to historical averages amid sentiment tied to sector catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors PWR due to its unmatched scale, record backlog visibility, and consistent trend strength from utility/data center demand. While IESC offers relative value and stability, PWR's catalysts position it probabilistically stronger for sustained outperformance in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2026
Stock price -- (IESC: $639.45PRIM: $104.70PWR: $714.13)
Brand notoriety: IESC, PRIM and PWR are all not notable
The three companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IESC: 113%, PRIM: 143%, PWR: 142%
Market capitalization -- IESC: $12.74B, PRIM: $5.68B, PWR: $107.16B
$IESC is valued at $12.74B, while PRIM has a market capitalization of $5.68B, and PWR's market capitalization is $107.16B. The market cap for tickers in this @Engineering & Construction ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Engineering & Construction industry is $10.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePRIM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PRIM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESC is a better buy in the long-term than PWR, which in turn is a better option than PRIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IESC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IESC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRIM is a better buy in the short-term than PWR, which in turn is a better option than IESC.

Price Growth

IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.71% price change this week, while PRIM (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -7.59% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated -6.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

PRIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.60% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($107B) has a higher market cap than IESC($12.7B) and PRIM($5.68B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than IESC and PRIM: PWR (97.96) vs IESC (34.10) and PRIM (23.11). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 69.278 vs. IESC (64.375) and PRIM (-15.610). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. IESC (537M) and PRIM (461M). PWR and PRIM has more cash in the bank: 365M and 362M vs. IESC (263M). IESC has less debt than PRIM and PWR: IESC (107M) vs PRIM (928M) and PWR (6.32B). PWR has higher revenues than PRIM and IESC: PWR (30.1B) vs PRIM (7.49B) and IESC (3.63B).
IESCPRIMPWR
Capitalization12.7B5.68B107B
EBITDA537M461M2.71B
Gain YTD64.375-15.61069.278
P/E Ratio34.1023.1197.96
Revenue3.63B7.49B30.1B
Total Cash263M362M365M
Total Debt107M928M6.32B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IESC vs PRIM vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
IESC
PRIM
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
846982
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7593
SMR RATING
1..100
225461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
153212
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRIM's Valuation (62) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (82) and is in the same range as PWR (92). This means that PRIM's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (7) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PRIM (59). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and somewhat faster than PRIM’s over the last 12 months.

IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PRIM (54) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (61). This means that IESC's stock grew similarly to PRIM’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (37) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PRIM (65). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and somewhat faster than PRIM’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (15) and is in the same range as PRIM (32). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and similarly to PRIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IESCPRIMPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IESC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSMV60.14N/A
N/A
VictoryShares US Mult-Fctr Mnmm Vltl ETF
JEPI56.08-0.05
-0.09%
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
RFCI22.11-0.06
-0.29%
ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF
TAXM49.70-0.18
-0.36%
Bondbloxx Ir+M Tax-Aware ETF For Massachusetts Residents
VFVA141.08-0.61
-0.43%
Vanguard US Value Factor ETF

IESC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESC
1D Price
Change %
IESC100%
-2.27%
FIX - IESC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
PWR - IESC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
EME - IESC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
MTZ - IESC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
STRL - IESC
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.51%
More

PRIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRIM has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRIM jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRIM
1D Price
Change %
PRIM100%
-3.62%
MTZ - PRIM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
MYRG - PRIM
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
ACM - PRIM
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
ROAD - PRIM
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
APG - PRIM
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-1.23%
MTZ - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
MYRG - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
FIX - PWR
75%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
IESC - PWR
67%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
EME - PWR
66%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
More