This comparison examines IESC, PRIM, and PWR, three leaders in the engineering and construction sector focused on infrastructure, utilities, and data centers. These stocks have captured investor attention amid rising demand for electrification, renewable energy, and AI-driven power needs. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and recent catalysts in the current market environment.
IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) designs and installs integrated electrical and technology systems for data centers, residential, commercial, and infrastructure markets. In recent market activity, the stock has surged, trading near its 52-week high of $677 with a YTD gain of 70% and 1-year return of 175%. Sentiment has been bolstered by strong Q2 FY26 results, with revenue at $974M and EPS of $5.44 beating estimates, driven by data center and infrastructure demand. TTM revenue stands at $3.63B, net income $378M, and low debt supports financial flexibility amid broader sector tailwinds.
PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation) delivers infrastructure construction, maintenance, and engineering services across utilities and energy segments in the U.S. and Canada. Recent weeks saw the stock hit a 52-week high before pulling back post-Q1 2026 earnings, with YTD return of 64% and 1-year gain of 203%. Q1 revenue of $1.56B missed estimates, prompting lowered full-year EPS guidance to $4.90 midpoint, though TTM figures show $7.57B revenue and $275M net income. Momentum from prior backlog growth has tempered by execution challenges in recent quarters.
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) provides comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, and pipelines. The stock has outperformed with YTD return of 83% and 1-year gain of 139%, recently hitting new highs. Q1 2026 results excelled, with $7.87B revenue (up 26% YoY), adjusted EPS $2.68 beating estimates, and raised full-year guidance amid a record $48.5B backlog fueled by utility and data center projects. TTM revenue is $30.1B, net income $1.1B.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ AI to navigate current market volatility, selecting opportunities in sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and infrastructure. Performance highlights include annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51%-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and trade durations from 15 minutes to 48 days. Strategies range from trend following and momentum to multi-agent systems with TP/SL exits (e.g., 3%/2%). Top bots target 1-18 tickers, emphasizing small caps, ETFs, and leveraged plays suited to today's conditions. Explore these for insights into automated trading across timeframes and styles.
All three firms share exposure to infrastructure and electrification but differ in scale and focus: PWR dominates with broad utility and pipeline services, $115B market cap, and massive backlog, versus IESC's electrical/data center niche ($13B cap) and PRIM's utilities/energy mix ($11B cap). Growth drivers include AI power demand for all, but PWR and IESC show superior recent earnings execution. Recent momentum favors PWR (83% YTD), though PRIM led 1-year at 203% pre-earnings dip. Risk factors: PWR carries higher debt ($6.3B), while IESC has minimal ($107M). Valuation sensitivity shows IESC (P/E 35) and PRIM (41) cheaper than PWR (106), trading at premiums to historical averages amid sentiment tied to sector catalysts.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PWR due to its unmatched scale, record backlog visibility, and consistent trend strength from utility/data center demand. While IESC offers relative value and stability, PWR's catalysts position it probabilistically stronger for sustained outperformance in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePRIM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.71% price change this week, while PRIM (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -7.59% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated -6.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.30%.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PRIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| IESC | PRIM | PWR | |
| Capitalization | 12.7B | 5.68B | 107B |
| EBITDA | 537M | 461M | 2.71B |
| Gain YTD | 64.375 | -15.610 | 69.278 |
| P/E Ratio | 34.10 | 23.11 | 97.96 |
| Revenue | 3.63B | 7.49B | 30.1B |
| Total Cash | 263M | 362M | 365M |
| Total Debt | 107M | 928M | 6.32B |
IESC | PRIM | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 69 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 59 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 54 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 65 | 6 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 32 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRIM's Valuation (62) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (82) and is in the same range as PWR (92). This means that PRIM's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (7) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PRIM (59). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and somewhat faster than PRIM’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PRIM (54) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (61). This means that IESC's stock grew similarly to PRIM’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (37) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PRIM (65). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and somewhat faster than PRIM’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (15) and is in the same range as PRIM (32). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to IESC’s and similarly to PRIM’s over the last 12 months.
| IESC | PRIM | PWR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VSMV | 60.14 | N/A | N/A |
| VictoryShares US Mult-Fctr Mnmm Vltl ETF | |||
| JEPI | 56.08 | -0.05 | -0.09% |
| JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| RFCI | 22.11 | -0.06 | -0.29% |
| ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF | |||
| TAXM | 49.70 | -0.18 | -0.36% |
| Bondbloxx Ir+M Tax-Aware ETF For Massachusetts Residents | |||
| VFVA | 141.08 | -0.61 | -0.43% |
| Vanguard US Value Factor ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| FIX - IESC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PWR - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| EME - IESC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| MTZ - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRIM has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PRIM jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRIM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIM | 100% | -3.62% | ||
| MTZ - PRIM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| MYRG - PRIM | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| ACM - PRIM | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| ROAD - PRIM | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.06% | ||
| APG - PRIM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| EME - PWR | 66% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||