Advertisement
INTC or KLAC or ON
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Intel Corporation (INTC) vs. KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs. ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- INTC has delivered strong YTD returns of about 18% and over 110% in the past year, rebounding amid AI partnerships despite recent volatility and regulatory scrutiny.
- KLAC, a leader in semiconductor process control, shows robust YTD gains around 11% but faces recent pressure from sector sell-offs tied to geopolitical tensions, with analysts optimistic on AI-driven demand.
- ON exhibits positive momentum with 6.7% monthly gains and upward EPS revisions, focusing on power semis for automotive and industrial uses, though YTD performance lags peers at around 3%.
- All three operate in semiconductors but differ in focus: INTC on design/fabs, KLAC on inspection tools, ON on analog/power chips, with recent sector volatility impacting performance.
- KLAC trades at a premium P/E of ~39 with high margins, while INTC appears undervalued post-rebound but reports losses; ON shows improving estimates.
- Tickeron AI bots targeting semis like KLAC peers show annualized returns up to 112%, highlighting potential in the space.
Introduction
This comparison examines INTC, KLAC, and ON, key players in the semiconductor sector amid AI and advanced chip demand. INTC focuses on processors and foundry services, KLAC on process control equipment, and ON on power management solutions. Traders seeking exposure to chip design, manufacturing tools, and analog semis, or investors tracking relative performance in volatile markets, will find value in analyzing their recent trends, valuations, and catalysts. With sector-wide pressures from geopolitics and supply chains, understanding contrasts aids informed positioning.
INTC Overview and Recent Performance
Intel Corporation (INTC) designs and manufactures advanced semiconductors, including CPUs for PCs, servers, and AI accelerators, while expanding its foundry business. In recent market activity, the stock has surged over 110% in the past year and 18% YTD, outperforming benchmarks, driven by AI collaborations like with Infosys and potential investments in AI startups such as SambaNova. However, sentiment has mixed with volatility from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on China-linked equipment and quarterly revenue declines of about 4%, alongside analyst projections for EPS improvement. Trading around $43 with a market cap near $217B, INTC reflects turnaround efforts amid competitive pressures.
KLAC Overview and Recent Performance
KLA Corporation (KLAC) provides process control and yield management solutions essential for semiconductor manufacturing. Recent weeks have seen heightened volatility, with shares dropping amid sector sell-offs linked to geopolitical tensions, including a 5-6% decline in sessions, though YTD returns stand at about 11% and 98% over the past year. Strong Q2 earnings beat estimates, with revenue up 7% YoY and EPS growth, fueled by AI infrastructure and advanced packaging demand, where revenues rose over 70%. Analysts have raised price targets, citing upcycle potential in wafer fab equipment. With a P/E around 39 and market cap of $177B, KLAC benefits from high margins but remains sensitive to capex cycles.
ON Overview and Recent Performance
ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) specializes in power semiconductors, sensors, and analog chips for automotive, industrial, and IoT applications. Recent performance shows resilience, with 6.7% gains over the past month versus broader market declines, YTD around 3%, and 28% over the past year, amid positive EPS revisions of 12.7% for the quarter. Factors include strong Q4 results prompting Deutsche Bank to lift its target to $75, and focus on EV and automation growth. Trading near $57 with a $24B market cap, ON navigates inventory cycles but gains from end-market recovery, with consensus EPS up 24% YoY.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and pattern recognition across timeframes from 5 minutes to daily. Only bots excelling in current conditions—such as high volatility or sector rotations—earn a spot, with stats like annualized returns up to 133%, win rates of 60-90%, and profit factors over 2.5 featured prominently. For instance, semiconductor-focused bots including KLAC peers like LRCX and AMAT show +100% annualized returns with 69% win rates, while broader semi-oil-energy portfolios hit +93%. These virtual agents adapt via financial learning models, offering copy-trading for users. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots suited to today’s market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
INTC, KLAC, and ON share semiconductor exposure but diverge in models: INTC’s integrated design-to-fab approach contrasts KLAC’s equipment niche and ON’s discrete/power focus. Growth drivers include AI for all, but KLAC leads in advanced packaging momentum (70%+ revenue growth), while INTC chases foundry recovery and ON leverages auto/industrial rebound. Recent momentum favors INTC’s 110% 1Y return over KLAC’s 98% and ON’s 28%, though all faced geo-selloffs. Risks: INTC’s regulatory/competition headwinds, KLAC’s capex sensitivity, ON’s cyclicality. Valuation: KLAC at 39x P/E with 42% margins premium to INTC’s losses and ON’s improving outlook; sentiment tilts to equipment/tools amid AI buildout.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward KLAC based on trend consistency in process control amid AI capex surges, superior margins, and bots targeting similar semis delivering 100%+ annualized returns with solid win rates. INTC shows rebound potential via catalysts like AI fabrics, while ON offers stability in power semis; however, KLAC’s relative positioning in the supply chain upcycle provides higher probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKLAC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and ON’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- ON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ON’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KLAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ON’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
INTC (@Semiconductors) experienced а +22.51% price change this week, while KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +13.87% , and ON (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +10.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
INTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
KLAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
ON is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.01% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| INTC | KLAC | ON | |
| Capitalization | 310B | 226B | 26.9B |
| EBITDA | 14.4B | 5.91B | 888M |
| Gain YTD | 67.263 | 42.337 | 26.482 |
| P/E Ratio | 904.17 | 50.28 | 236.17 |
| Revenue | 52.9B | 12.7B | 6B |
| Total Cash | 37.4B | 5.21B | 2.55B |
| Total Debt | 46.6B | 6.11B | 3.01B |
INTC | KLAC | ON | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 80 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 6 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 13 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 4 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 15 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KLAC's Valuation (83) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ON (87) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as INTC (96) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew similarly to ON’s and similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ON (73) in the Semiconductors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew significantly faster than ON’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for ON (88) in the Semiconductors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (89) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew significantly faster than ON’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
INTC's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as ON (7) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that INTC's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.
ON's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (15) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (86) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ON's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
| INTC | KLAC | ON | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | N/A | 1 day ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KNG | 49.65 | 0.12 | +0.24% |
| FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF | |||
| IRVH | 19.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF | |||
| BKF | 42.07 | -0.06 | -0.14% |
| iShares MSCI BIC ETF | |||
| KIE | 56.89 | -0.09 | -0.16% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Insurance ETF | |||
| IONL | 10.12 | -0.63 | -5.86% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF | |||
INTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 100% | +4.70% | ||
| LRCX - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| AMAT - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| KLIC - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +6.14% | ||
| FORM - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| VECO - INTC | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +3.28% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 89% Closely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 88% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| NVMI - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | +3.90% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 80% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||
ON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ON has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ON jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.