Advertisement
INTC or MRVL or QCOM
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRVL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRVL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRVL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MRVL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
INTC (@Semiconductors) experienced а +22.51% price change this week, while MRVL (@Semiconductors) price change was +11.97% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +0.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
INTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
MRVL is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| INTC | MRVL | QCOM | |
| Capitalization | 310B | 105B | 136B |
| EBITDA | 14.4B | 4.36B | 14.8B |
| Gain YTD | 67.263 | 41.229 | -24.835 |
| P/E Ratio | 904.17 | 39.07 | 25.76 |
| Revenue | 52.9B | 7.79B | 44.9B |
| Total Cash | 37.4B | 2.72B | 11.8B |
| Total Debt | 46.6B | 4.78B | 14.8B |
INTC | MRVL | QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 27 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 49 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 47 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 37 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 39 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVL (68) in the Semiconductors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (96) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew somewhat faster than MRVL’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
MRVL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (89) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s and somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's SMR Rating (42) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as MRVL (47) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (89) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
INTC's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVL (37) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (63) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that INTC's stock grew somewhat faster than MRVL’s and somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as MRVL (39) in the Semiconductors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (86) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
| INTC | MRVL | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTGD | 29.50 | 0.51 | +1.75% |
| STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF | |||
| XTJL | 39.73 | 0.21 | +0.53% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul | |||
| IWF | 445.21 | 2.06 | +0.46% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |||
| PAUG | 43.75 | 0.13 | +0.30% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BufferETFAug | |||
| KBA | 31.03 | N/A | N/A |
| KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF | |||
INTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 100% | +4.70% | ||
| LRCX - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| AMAT - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| KLIC - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +6.14% | ||
| FORM - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| VECO - INTC | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
More | ||||
MRVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRVL has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRVL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL | 100% | +4.79% | ||
| LRCX - MRVL | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| ENTG - MRVL | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| TOELY - MRVL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| KLAC - MRVL | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| KLIC - MRVL | 61% Loosely correlated | +6.14% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +4.98% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +5.19% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| AMAT - QCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
More | ||||