INTC
Price
$61.72
Change
+$2.77 (+4.70%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
309.9B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$421.51
Change
+$14.78 (+3.63%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
475.35B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSM
Price
$365.49
Change
-$0.41 (-0.11%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.59T
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

INTC or MU or TSM

Header iconINTC vs MU vs TSM Comparison
Open Charts INTC vs MU vs TSMBanner chart's image
INTC vs MU vs TSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Intel Corporation (INTC) vs. Micron Technology (MU) vs. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • TSM leads with robust AI-driven demand, reporting strong revenue growth and expanding mega fabs, positioning it as the foundry leader amid ~90% YTD gains for peers in semiconductors.
  • MU excels in memory for AI infrastructure, shipping innovative 256GB modules and projecting 132% revenue growth, with shares up over 300% in the past year despite recent volatility.
  • INTC shows turnaround momentum via 18A node progress and AI CPU demand but faces manufacturing scrutiny and negative EPS, with ~120% one-year returns.
  • All three benefit from AI tailwinds, but TSM demonstrates superior stability and market share in advanced nodes.
  • Recent market dips reflect broader sentiment, yet relative performance highlights MU and TSM momentum over INTC.
  • Semiconductor sector exposure ties their fortunes to AI data center expansion, with contrasts in business models driving trade-offs.

Introduction

This comparison examines INTC, MU, and TSM, three pivotal players in the semiconductor industry fueling AI and high-performance computing. Intel focuses on processors and foundry services, Micron on memory solutions, and TSMC on contract manufacturing. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term AI growth will find value in analyzing their recent price behaviors, sentiment shifts, and relative positioning amid surging data center demand and supply chain dynamics. This stock comparison highlights key contrasts in recent market activity.

INTC Overview and Recent Performance

Intel Corporation (INTC) designs and manufactures advanced semiconductors, including CPUs for data centers, PCs, and AI applications, while expanding its foundry business. In recent market activity, shares have delivered strong one-year returns exceeding 120%, reflecting optimism around AI data center rebuilds and Xeon processor demand. Trading around $43-46 with a ~$217B market cap, the stock experienced volatility from U.S. lawmaker scrutiny over China-linked equipment testing and leadership changes, including CEO Lip-Bu Tan reconsidering 18A tech for external clients. Sentiment has shifted positively on CPU market growth projections and server demand, though negative EPS and manufacturing yield challenges temper gains in recent weeks.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) specializes in DRAM, NAND, and high-bandwidth memory critical for AI servers and data centers. Shares, around $370 with a ~$417B market cap, have surged over 300% in the past year, driven by AI memory demand. Recent performance includes shipping the industry's first 256GB SOCAMM2 modules and India expansion, with analysts forecasting 132% revenue and 349% EPS growth for fiscal 2026. Despite short-term dips amid market meltdowns, strong Q1 results and HBM momentum have bolstered sentiment, with YTD gains around 30% outperforming broader tech.

TSM Overview and Recent Performance

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), the world's leading pure-play foundry, produces advanced chips for AI leaders like Nvidia. With a ~$1.76T market cap and shares near $339, it posted ~86% one-year returns and 13% YTD, fueled by AI accelerator demand. Recent developments include accelerating a Southern Taiwan mega fab and 36.8% January revenue growth year-over-year, with 3nm/5nm nodes comprising over 60% of sales. Sentiment remains strong on 30%+ 2026 revenue outlook and high gross margins (~59%), despite geopolitical risks, supporting consistent outperformance.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility and trends—like semiconductors and AI—earn a spot, with stats including annualized returns up to +220%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors to 25+. Examples include Semiconductors SOXL (5min AI/ML) at +114% annualized return and 70% win rate, and multi-ticker bots blending semis with aerospace at +135% returns. These bots employ 5-60 minute patterns, swing trades (1-62 days), and sector rotations for outperformance. Explore Tickeron’s AI tools to see how they adapt to stocks like INTC, MU, and TSM in today’s market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

INTC pursues an integrated model blending design and manufacturing, contrasting TSM’s pure foundry focus (70%+ market share) and MU’s memory specialization. Growth drivers diverge: TSM and MU ride AI chip and HBM surges (30-132% revenue projections), while INTC rebuilds via 18A foundry amid yield hurdles. Recent momentum favors MU/TSM with 300%+ and 86% gains versus INTC’s 120%, though all show AI exposure. Risks include INTC’s negative EPS and geopolitical scrutiny, MU’s cyclical memory pricing, and TSM’s Taiwan tensions. Valuation sensitivity is acute—TSM’s P/E ~32 reflects stability, MU’s growth premium, and INTC’s negative P/E turnaround bet. Market sentiment tilts to TSM’s consistency over INTC’s volatility and MU’s boom-bust cycles.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSM for its trend consistency, dominant foundry positioning, and reliable AI catalysts like mega fab expansions and 30%+ growth outlook. Relative to INTC’s manufacturing risks and MU’s volatility, TSM offers higher probability of sustained outperformance amid data center builds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (INTC: $61.72MU: $421.51TSM: $365.49)
Brand notoriety: INTC, MU and TSM are all notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTC: 210%, MU: 102%, TSM: 69%
Market capitalization -- INTC: $309.9B, MU: $475.35B, TSM: $1.59T
$INTC is valued at $309.9B, while MU has a market capitalization of $475.35B, and TSM's market capitalization is $1.59T. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $110.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and TSM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • INTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSM is a better buy in the long-term than MU, which in turn is a better option than INTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the short-term than INTC, which in turn is a better option than TSM.

Price Growth

INTC (@Semiconductors) experienced а +22.51% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +15.09% , and TSM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

TSM is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+5.71% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSM($1.59T) has a higher market cap than MU($475B) and INTC($310B). INTC has higher P/E ratio than TSM and MU: INTC (904.17) vs TSM (35.22) and MU (19.89). INTC YTD gains are higher at: 67.263 vs. MU (47.748) and TSM (20.944). TSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.74T vs. MU (37.1B) and INTC (14.4B). INTC has more cash in the bank: 37.4B vs. MU (8.44B) and TSM (). MU has less debt than INTC and TSM: MU (12.4B) vs INTC (46.6B) and TSM (). TSM has higher revenues than MU and INTC: TSM (3.81T) vs MU (58.1B) and INTC (52.9B).
INTCMUTSM
Capitalization310B475B1.59T
EBITDA14.4B37.1B2.74T
Gain YTD67.26347.74820.944
P/E Ratio904.1719.8935.22
Revenue52.9B58.1B3.81T
Total Cash37.4B8.44BN/A
Total Debt46.6B12.4BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTC vs MU vs TSM: Fundamental Ratings
INTC
MU
TSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
296923
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90189
SMR RATING
1..100
891726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
865220
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
905050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSM's Valuation (49) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (52) and is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (96). This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to MU’s and somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (18) and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (90). This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to MU’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSM (26) and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (89). This means that MU's stock grew similarly to TSM’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as INTC (2) and is somewhat better than the same rating for TSM (38). This means that MU's stock grew similarly to INTC’s and somewhat faster than TSM’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (52) and is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (86). This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to MU’s and significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTCMUTSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTGD29.500.51
+1.75%
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF
XTJL39.730.21
+0.53%
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jul
IWF445.212.06
+0.46%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
PAUG43.750.13
+0.30%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BufferETFAug
KBA31.03N/A
N/A
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF

INTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTC
1D Price
Change %
INTC100%
+4.70%
LRCX - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.98%
AMAT - INTC
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
KLIC - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
+6.14%
FORM - INTC
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
VECO - INTC
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
More

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
+3.63%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+6.14%
VECO - MU
70%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
More

TSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSM has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSM jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSM
1D Price
Change %
TSM100%
-0.11%
ASML - TSM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
ASX - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
LRCX - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
+4.98%
NVDA - TSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
MPWR - TSM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More