IONQ
Price
$51.95
Change
-$5.52 (-9.61%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.39B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QBTS
Price
$20.35
Change
-$1.78 (-8.04%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.54B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGTI
Price
$17.85
Change
-$1.42 (-7.37%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.93B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ or QBTS or RGTI

Header iconIONQ vs QBTS vs RGTI Comparison
Open Charts IONQ vs QBTS vs RGTIBanner chart's image
IONQ vs QBTS vs RGTI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? IonQ (IONQ) vs. D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) vs. Rigetti Computing (RGTI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IONQ leads with the largest market capitalization at $16.9 billion and highest quarterly revenue of $61.9 million in Q4 2025, signaling greater scale in quantum computing.
  • QBTS and RGTI show stronger year-to-date (YTD) gains of about 21-22%, outperforming IONQ's modest 3% YTD amid sector volatility.
  • All three stocks exhibited robust recent momentum, with IONQ surging over 56% in April 2026, reflecting heightened investor interest in quantum advancements.
  • Analysts rate all as Strong Buys, but IONQ boasts the highest average price target upside relative to current levels around $46.
  • High price-to-sales (P/S) ratios—exceeding 100x for IONQ and far higher for peers—underscore premium valuations tied to future quantum potential versus current revenues.

Introduction

Pure-play quantum computing stocks like IONQ, QBTS, and RGTI have captured attention amid rising interest in next-generation technologies intersecting with AI and high-performance computing. These companies develop hardware and software for quantum systems, positioning them at the forefront of a nascent industry projected for exponential growth. Traders seeking high-volatility opportunities and long-term investors eyeing disruptive tech find value in comparing their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning. This analysis highlights relative performance and key drivers in the current environment, aiding informed decision-making without speculation.

IONQ Overview and Recent Performance

IonQ, Inc. specializes in trapped-ion quantum computers, offering gate-model systems accessible via major cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. Its business emphasizes scalable quantum processing units (QPUs) for complex simulations and optimization. In recent market activity, IONQ shares traded around $46.20, with a market cap of $16.9 billion. The stock soared 56.5% in April 2026, buoyed by strong Q4 2025 revenue of $61.9 million—up significantly year-over-year—and broader quantum policy momentum, including a national bill advancing industry support. Sentiment has shifted positively on revenue trajectory and partnerships, though YTD returns lag at 3% amid sector swings.

QBTS Overview and Recent Performance

D-Wave Quantum Inc. focuses on quantum annealing technology, enabling practical applications in optimization and machine learning today via its Advantage systems and Leap cloud service. This differentiates it with near-term commercial use cases. Recently, QBTS hovered near $20.49, with a $7.6 billion market cap. Performance reflected volatility but solid YTD gains of 21.6%, driven by bookings growth and an upcoming Investor Day at the NYSE. Q4 2025 revenue reached $2.75 million, supporting early 2026 momentum despite profitability challenges. Investor sentiment centers on execution in real-world deployments.

RGTI Overview and Recent Performance

Rigetti Computing, Inc. builds superconducting qubit-based quantum processors, pursuing a full-stack approach from chips to software. Its systems target hybrid quantum-classical computing. RGTI recently traded at $17.52, with a $5.8 billion market cap. Shares recovered 14.5% in April 2026 after a Q1 dip, posting 20.9% YTD amid anticipation for Q1 results and a $100 million U.K. expansion. Q4 2025 revenue was $1.87 million, with performance influenced by high-performance computing hype and peer comparisons. Sentiment balances growth prospects against operational scaling risks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ machine learning for real-time signals, featuring win rates from 51% to 88%, annualized returns up to 163%, and profit factors ranging 1.5 to 11.7. Styles vary from trend-following and swing trading (average holds 1-49 days) to sector rotations in semiconductors, data centers, and ETFs. High performers show profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 17, adapting to volatile markets. Traders can copy these bots for automated execution matching current conditions. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify suitable strategies for stocks like quantum plays.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IONQ, QBTS, and RGTI all target quantum supremacy but diverge in architectures: IONQ's trapped-ion for universal gates, QBTS' annealing for optimization, and RGTI's superconducting for hybrid apps. Growth drivers include IONQ's revenue scale versus peers' earlier-stage traction. Recent momentum favors IONQ's April surge, though QBTS and RGTI lead YTD. Risks are uniform—cash burn, dilution, tech hurdles—but IONQ's larger backlog offers relative stability. Sector exposure ties to AI infrastructure, with sentiment boosted by policy tailwinds. Valuation sensitivity is acute, with P/S ratios in triple digits; IONQ appears least extended. Trade-offs pit IONQ's maturity against QBTS/RGTI's upside potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IONQ among the trio, based on superior trend consistency, revenue momentum, and analyst backing with a $64+ price target. Its market leadership and policy catalysts position it strongly for near-term relative outperformance, though quantum volatility persists across all.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (IONQ: $51.95QBTS: $20.35RGTI: $17.85)
Brand notoriety: IONQ, QBTS and RGTI are all not notable
The three companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 92%, QBTS: 86%, RGTI: 94%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $19.39B, QBTS: $7.54B, RGTI: $5.93B
$IONQ is valued at $19.39B, while QBTS has a market capitalization of $7.54B, and RGTI's market capitalization is $5.93B. The market cap for tickers in this @Computer Processing Hardware ranges from $178.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Computer Processing Hardware industry is $17.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQBTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and RGTI’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGTI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the long-term than QBTS and RGTI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and RGTI’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RGTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the short-term than RGTI, which in turn is a better option than QBTS.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +5.50% price change this week, while QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -9.84% , and RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price fluctuated -5.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

RGTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (-0.25% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($19.4B) has a higher market cap than QBTS($7.54B) and RGTI($5.93B). IONQ YTD gains are higher at: 15.779 vs. RGTI (-19.413) and QBTS (-22.180). RGTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -208.04M vs. QBTS (-348.74M) and IONQ (-710.97M). IONQ has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. QBTS (884M) and RGTI (444M). RGTI has less debt than IONQ and QBTS: RGTI (7.17M) vs IONQ (30.4M) and QBTS (43.5M). IONQ has higher revenues than QBTS and RGTI: IONQ (187M) vs QBTS (24.6M) and RGTI (7.09M).
IONQQBTSRGTI
Capitalization19.4B7.54B5.93B
EBITDA-710.97M-348.74M-208.04M
Gain YTD15.779-22.180-19.413
P/E Ratio133.21N/AN/A
Revenue187M24.6M7.09M
Total Cash2.03B884M444M
Total Debt30.4M43.5M7.17M
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQQBTSRGTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSQAX25.21N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Equity Income A
NAESX137.53N/A
N/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index Inv
DRDAX24.42N/A
N/A
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
ERLVX29.68N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
MNCSX13.21N/A
N/A
Mercer Non-US Core Equity I

IONQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IONQ
1D Price
Change %
IONQ100%
-9.61%
RGTI - IONQ
79%
Closely correlated
-7.37%
QBTS - IONQ
77%
Closely correlated
-8.04%
QUBT - IONQ
70%
Closely correlated
-10.44%
QMCO - IONQ
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
CAN - IONQ
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.12%
More

QBTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBTS
1D Price
Change %
QBTS100%
-8.04%
RGTI - QBTS
78%
Closely correlated
-7.37%
QUBT - QBTS
72%
Closely correlated
-10.44%
IONQ - QBTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-9.61%
QMCO - QBTS
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
CAN - QBTS
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.12%
More